What's new

Indian army cheif calling Kashmir disputed territory

Irony P-O-K is known as being not occupied. Its called Azad Kashmir. One has to be an Indian to call Azad as occupied. With this definition applied back on India, India got occupied in 1947!
If calling something Azad make it not occupied,by th same logic is the rest of Pakistan occupied that you dint name it Azad Pakistan.Irony
 
Who cares what he or other bharatis say!!!
 
If calling something Azad make it not occupied,by th same logic is the rest of Pakistan occupied that you dint name it Azad Pakistan.Irony

There is no escape for you for this definition either. If you think Pakistan is not Azad becuse it doens't have this prefix, you equally live in an non-Azad country. There is no resting spot for you in this argument either.

But you couldn't defend your flawed definition of P-O-K which is still Azad? Fair enough!
 
There is no escape for you for this definition either. If you think Pakistan is not Azad becuse it doens't have this prefix, you equally live in an non-Azad country. There is no resting spot for you in this argument either.

But you couldn't defend your flawed definition of P-O-K which is still Azad? Fair enough!
You are the one bro who came up with ,since po k has Azad a prefix it not occupied.
 
I will give benefit of doubt by assuming that he is reffrering Indian Occoupied Kashmir by Child killer and women beater na punsak army. Q k mardon ka kaam ni hai aurton aur bachon pr goliyan chalana :-)

Right.

Read about Hamoodur_Rahman_Commission and its findings.

"The Report's findings accuse the Pakistani Army of carrying out senseless and wanton arson, killings in the countryside, killing of intellectuals and professionals and burying them in mass graves, killing of Bengali Officers and soldiers on the pretence of quelling their rebellion, killing East Pakistani civilian officers, businessmen and industrialists, raping a large number of East Pakistani women as a deliberate act of revenge, retaliation and torture, and deliberate killing of members of the Hindu minority."


And after killing and raping women, this napunsak Mard e momins surrendered their balls to a lady.
 
Irony P-O-K is known as being not occupied. Its called Azad Kashmir. One has to be an Indian to call Azad as occupied. With this definition applied back on India, India got occupied in 1947!

For us that is occupied by Pakistan.
 
P-O-K according to India includes AJK and G-B

This is a unique kind of occupation in is independent in every possible way. It doesn't have military occupation yet it is occupied, it has international press and media access yet it is occupied, it has its own Prime Minister and National Assembly yet it is occupied.

On the other hand, Indian Occupied Kashmir has a "special status", not constitutional part of India, an insurgency from the last 4 decades, most heavily militarily infiltrated, denied access to International Press, has more than 80,000 Muslims assassinated and majority Muslim area which is still not "disputed" or "occupied" as per your brains.

You are the one bro who came up with ,since po k has Azad a prefix it not occupied.

Azad Kashmir has Azad Prefix because there is a part of Kashmir which doesn't have this Prefix. It is Non Azad Kashmir which translates to Occupied Kashmir
 
Last edited:
Azad Kashmir has Azad Prefix because there is a part of Kashmir which doesn't have this Prefix. It is Non Azad Kashmir which translates to Occupied Kashmir
you are repeating the samething agian,let me help you understand
first you dont have any kashmir,the whole valley is with India,now you can name lahore as NY,but will that make lahore NY.

Second if we name Our part as azad j and k,will you consider everything resolved,the reason we dint name azad is because,part of our state is still occupied by your country so we cannt call it Azad yet.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom