What's new

India World's Third to Manufacture Raw Materials For Nano-Crystal Medicines; NanoCrySP Tech Patented

Chanakya's_Chant

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
3,395
Reaction score
28
Country
India
Location
India
Nano medicine breakthrough a giant leap for India

medicine.jpg

The nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery market is estimated to be $136 billion. (Image courtesy: Getty Images)

CHANDIGARH: National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Mohali has put India in the select club of countries that manufacture raw material for generating nano-crystal based medicines.

Nano-crystals are tiny nanometre-sized particles of the drug that act faster and more efficiently than the conventional ones. The US and Ireland are the only other countries where the technology is available.

NIPER has already got an Indian patent for the technology and has now applied for the US and the European patents. The indigenous technology will cut the cost of such drugs by almost half, claim experts who have developed the technology in laboratory quantities at NIPER.

The nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery market is estimated to be $136 billion. Out of this, 60% share is expected to be occupied by nanocrystals.

"NIPER has developed a technology for generation of nano crystalline solid dispersions called NanoCrySP. More than 60% of the drugs are not easily soluble in water. This prevents their absorption in the blood and tissues and most of the drug is excreted without absorption. Consequently, oral drugs lose their efficiency. Using nano-crystals for medicines this problem of insolubility has been resolved, as the technology to prepare raw material for the production of these crystals has been developed," said Dr K K Bhutani acting director of NIPER.

He added, "Unlike the available and patented technology abroad, the indigenous process generates the nano-crystals directly as a solid powder, rather than as a nano-suspension in liquid that has to be subsequently converted into a solid. This has helped in cutting down the cost of generating nano-crystal raw material and opening further competition in the pharmaceutical drug development market."

NIPER has entered into licensing agreement for development and commercialisation, retaining the ownership of the patent, with Windlas Biotech limited, an Indian pharmaceutical company. Currently the technology is in nascent stage of laboratory scale trials. The commercial partner would scale up the technology and go further for clinical trials.

After commercialization of products based on NanoCrySP, sales linked royalty payment shall be made to NIPER by the company. This technology, if successful, could allow for discovery of new treatments for existing molecules.

Source:- Nano medicine breakthrough a giant leap for India - The Times of India
 
. . . .
Great Job.
We can monopolize this market like HIV Medicines. Cost effective Indian drugs may be a blessing on the the billions of poor people who can not afford those costly medicines.
 
. . .
pharmaceuticals, India, patents...... seems like an odd mix in a statement :cheesy:

India is not against Patents but Evergreening of Patents as in the case of Pharmaceutical Industry in the Developed World - Their patent offices grant monopoly protection too easily for innovations that didn’t represent major advances over existing medicines or known science. Longer-acting versions of old medicines are given patents, allowing their manufacturers to market them as better than the older versions, whose patents had expired—and whose prices were cheap. The collective effect of a low bar for patents drives up healthcare costs and insurance premiums for patients which is not acceptable in India.

For example Gleevec, a cancer drug that costs $70,000 per year in the United States costs just $2,500 per year in India because it can't be patented here. Gleevec's patent is set to expire in US on February 1, 2016 with which it's price will come down to as low as $25,000 per year compared to the current $70,000 per year - but again Gleevec's manufacturer is planning to renew the same patent on account of those so called "major advances" over existing drug which will end up keeping the price same or even more - that's how they work there which is not the case with India.

More than 80% of pharmaceutical, pharmachemical, and biotechnological patent applications recorded between 1995–2006 were in just six countries (US, Japan, Germany, France, UK and Switzerland)

When you weigh the need to stimulate innovation by rewarding it against the imperative of making life-saving inventions accessible to people, India’s approach surely makes sense. New products aren’t developed in a vacuum, after all. They rely on generations of discoveries to which a whole population - indeed a whole world, is the legitimate heir.

BTW these so called patent infringements are solely bases on the fact that the drugs are too costly to afford - but in the case of this NanoCrySP patent - this indigenous technology will cut the cost of such drugs by almost half serving the same purpose!
 
.
R&D expenditure of 25 Indian pharma cos surges by 20.6% in 2013-14

The Research and Development (R&D) spending of 25 leading Indian pharmaceutical companies increased by 20.6 per cent to Rs. 6,103 crore during the year 2013-14 from Rs. 5,060 crore in the previous year. With higher R&D investments, Indian companies secured 81 ANDA approvals from US FDA during the first eight months i.e. January-August 2014 which worked out to almost 31 per cent of total ANDA approved during this period. For the last three years the R&D investment as percentage of net sales of Pharmabiz sample of 25 pharmaceutical companies worked out to over 7 per cent despite higher growth in net sales.

Though, this R&D expenditure is negligible as compared to spending by international giants, the Indian companies have able to introduce several new products with exclusivity period in regulated markets. The investment in R&D has assisted well to overcome stiff competition by launching affordable new products in international market.

During last 10 years i.e. 2004-05 to 2013-14, the major 20 Indian pharmaceutical companies spent aggregate amount of Rs. 32,495 crore on R&D activities on standalone basis and these companies generated aggregate net sales of Rs. 4,24,220 crore. However, these companies failed to produce any single blockbuster new drug during last ten years. The Indian companies are basically focusing on new generics. Dr Reddy's Laboratories incurred aggregate R&D expenditure of Rs. 5,070 crore during last 10 years and remained on top among the 20 companies, followed by Ranbaxy (Rs. 4,877 crore), Lupin (Rs. 4,589 crore) Cipla (Rs. 2,716 crore) and Cadila Healthcare (Rs. 2,608 crore).

Indian players are well set to tap up-coming opportunities from patent expiration. Modern R&D centres, scientists pool, ability to undertake complex developmental research projects, clinical trials, entry into biotechnology, tie-ups with international giants & universities and upgradation of technology assisted well. Investments in R&D offered higher approval from US FDA, EDQM, MHRA, TGA, ANVISA, WHO and other regulatory bodies. These companies developed strong product pipeline for future introduction.

During the fiscal year ended March 2014, Dr Reddy's Laboratories (DRL) remained as top R&D spender at Rs. 1,071 crore (standalone) followed by Lupin Rs. 958 crore (consolidated), Ranbaxy Laboratories Rs. 528 crore (for 15 months period), Cipla Rs. 518 crore and Cadila Helathcare Rs. 445 crore. Dr Reddy's R&D expenditure as percentage of net sales worked out to 11.1 per cent. Lupin, Cadila Healthcare, Sun Pharmaceutical, Piramal Healthcare, Wockhardt, Sun Pharma Advance Research Co (SPARC) and Panacea Biotec invested significant higher amount in R&D and their R&D investment as percentage of net sales worked out to over 10 per cent during 2013-14.

DRL has set up eight R&D, product and technology development centers across globe which empowered it to deliver solutions across therapeutic areas. It has filed 13 product in the USA and its cumulatively, 62 ANDAs are pending for approval from US FDA. Of these, 39 are Para IVs – out of which nearly nine have 'First to File' status. Its revenue in North America increased by 46 per cent to Rs. 5,530 crore during 2013-14. DRL entered into an alliance with Merck Serono, a division of Merck KGaA, Germany, in 2012 to co-develop a portfolio of biosimilar compounds in oncology. The company is developing more than 15 proprietary products with lower risk. It acquired OctoPlus, a specialty research facility, in the Netherlands during 2013.

R&D expenditure as percentage of net sales of SPARC, a separate research and development arm of Sun Pharmaceutical, worked out to 81.5 per cent. After planned merger of Ranbaxy with Sun Pharmaceutical, the aggregate R&D spending of Sun Pharma will go up significantly to the level ofRs. 1,000 crore with more regulatory filings.

Sun Pharma's sales in the US increased by 59 per cent mainly due to complex generics and contribution from the 180-day exclusivity for generic Prandin. Sun Pharma received a total 26 ANDA approvals from the US FDA during 2013-14 and it has 134 ANDAs pending approval. This pipeline is expected to be one of the key drivers of future growth. Its patent filing reached at 573 numbers and patent granted worked out to 346 numbers as at the end of March 2014. It also filed 15 DMF/CEPs.

Lupin's consolidated R&D expenditure increased by 24.4 per cent to Rs. 958 crore in 2013-14 and it received 45 approvals in key advanced markets including 22 and one supplemental NDA in the US, 10 in EU, 6 in Australia, 5 in Canada and 2 in Japan. It also filed 19 ANDAs with US and 4 MAAs with European regulatory authorities. Its cumulative ANDA filings with US FDA stood at 192 with 99 approvals. It has 30 confirmed first-to-file including 15 exclusive ones. Its ADDS programme received further project milestone payments aggregating US$ 8.8 million.

Lupin acquired Nanomi BV in the Netherlands for its patented technology platforms that it plans to leverage to develop complex injectable products. It is setting up two dedicated centres of excellence for research in inhalation and complex injectables in Florida and Maryland in the US. It has setup joint venture with Yoshindo Inc, Japan for conducting clinical development of certain biosimilars.

Wockhardt's standalone R&D expenditure moved up to Rs. 242 crore from Rs. 219 crore in the previous year. However, its consolidated R&D spending increased to Rs. 450 crore from Rs. 376 crore and worked out to 9.7 per cent of total sales. Wockhardt established R&D centres in India, US and Europe to cater to the technological needs of the products. It is focusing on biotechnology programme in developing biosimilars of insulin and its analogs.

Biocon entered into exclusive and collaborative research and marketing agreements to develop and commercialise a basket of molecules globally. The company has collaborated with Bristol-Myers Squibb for oral insulin project IN-105. Recently, it entered into strategic R&D tie-ups with Advaxis and Quark Pharma. Syngene, a research services company, and Clinigene, a clinical research arm, are focusing on end-to-end biopharma expertise. Syngene inaugurated Baxter's Global Research Center during 2013-14.

Aurobindo's standalone R&D spending increased to Rs. 271 crore during 2013-14 from Rs. 233 crore in the previous year. Aurobindo filed 78 ANDAs with US FDA during 2013-14 and cumulative filing reached at 336 ANDAs with approval of 195 ANDAs. It also filed 18 DMFs and cumulative filing of DMFs reached at 190.

The Indian companies' investment in R&D will play important role when the returns from R&D investments by international giants is diminishing. For several years major international players have not brought any block buster drug despite huge investment in R&D activities. Thus, on one hand, the outcome from investment in R&D is diminishing and on the other hand several new products are creating new competition for old products. The indigenous developed manufacturing process & technologies and availability of talent pool offered competitiveness to Indian players.

Indian companies received final approval for 154 ANDAs during the year 2013 from US FDA and 38 tentative ANDAs approval. The US FDA has approved a total 400 final ANDAs during the year 2013 as against 476 in the previous year and it approved total 86 tentative ANDAs during 2013 as against 94 during 2012.

During the first eight months ended January-August 2014, Sun Pharmaceutical and its subsidiaries, viz., Caraco Pharma and Taro Pharma, secured 14 ANDA approvals from US FDA, followed by Zydus Healthcare 11, Lupin 9 and Strides Arcolab 6. Similarly, Aurobindo Pharma, DRL, Emcure Pharma and Macleods Pharma got 5 ANDA approvals each. These approval with higher investment in R&D will play key role in the future growth.

R&D expenditure of 25 Indian pharma cos surges by 20.6% in 2013-14
 
. .
Now where are those moron neighbors (publicly exploding types and blatantly copying types) who said India just robs west of intellectual property and produces cheap medicine as they do not pay royalty.
 
. .
Still they use Indian medicine
Now where are those moron neighbors (publicly exploding types and blatantly copying types) who said India just robs west of intellectual property and produces cheap medicine as they do not pay royalty.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom