India wants to build armament factories in Vietnam

[Hamza913]

LOL - he was born in Nepal - he became the Buddha in Bodh Gaya, India. Simply because Mother Teresa was born in Albania, doesn't mean she is not Indian. And it is moot anyways, because the Buddha pre-dates the existence of the modern nation state.

Alas, history mustn't be taught in your deck of the woods.

Steal Pakistani history? Which history is stolen?

If he was born in Nepal, that makes him Nepalese.

If you want to use the pre-nation argument, then he still doesn't belong to Hindustan.

Mother Teresa was Albanian, not Hindustani. She also had a terrible track record of abusing children so it's no wonder you look up to her along with Gandhi.

You really want me to go there? Indus Valley Civilisation, Gandhara, Porus, Panini, Kanishka, Akbar, Shah Jahan, etc. Your very country is named after our river. It's just ridiculous.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Trump just slap 50 bil sanction on CN, Cn economy is dying in Real Life, hundred million Cnese losing jobs. so just ignore their idiot comment here bro

Cn get out of slump house by Deng's azz licking policy in 1978 when Deng came to JP-US and begged help-protection from daddy JP-US. But daddy JP-US hate CN now and US-JP will put CN back to slump house again soon (I guess in 2023 )

LOL - he was born in Nepal - he became the Buddha in Bodh Gaya, India. Simply because Mother Teresa was born in Albania, doesn't mean she is not Indian. And it is moot anyways, because the Buddha pre-dates the existence of the modern nation state.

Alas, history mustn't be taught in your deck of the woods.

Steal Pakistani history? Which history is stolen?


LOL - you really have nothing to say except continue to make a fool of yourself? Please continue - you are extremely entertaining.

Oh, repeat again. We have the right to laugh at Indians and Vietnamese. The garbage is together with the garbage.

We live in the real world. But given the low level of social development in India and Vietnam, I forgive you for not being able to touch the real world. After all, you are too backward. Even in Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc., they is still more advanced than India and vietnam.

I just want to know that your crazy performance means Vietnam and India are more advanced than Iraq?

 

[Jackdaws]

If he was born in Nepal, that makes him Nepalese.

If you want to use the pre-nation argument, then he still doesn't belong to Hindustan.

Mother Teresa was Albanian, not Hindustani. She also had a terrible track record of abusing children so it's no wonder you look up to her along with Gandhi.

You really want me to go there? Indus Valley Civilisation, Gandhara, Porus, Panini, Kanishka, Akbar, Shah Jahan, etc. Your very country is named after our river. It's just ridiculous.

LOL

No, it doesn't make him Nepalese.

Mother Teresa abused children? What's your source?

Indus Valley Civilization straddles Western India and Pakistan. As if you would give up your claim to Indus Valley Civilization if your country included East Pakistan which has nothing to do with the IVC. Akbar, Shah Jahan were Indian rulers with capitals in Delhi - the fact that remote parts of the Mughal Empire included parts of Pakistan doesn't make them Pakistani.

Panini, Kanishka, Porus are obviously from areas in present day Pakistan - you are free to celebrate them - not that you do so. They are of Indic heritage - but it doesn't make them Indian.

Oh, repeat again. We have the right to laugh at Indians and Vietnamese. The garbage is together with the garbage.

We live in the real world. But given the low level of social development in India and Vietnam, I forgive you for not being able to touch the real world. After all, you are too backward. Even in Iraq, Syria, Libya, etc., they is still more advanced than India and vietnam.

I just want to know that your crazy performance means Vietnam and India are more advanced than Iraq?

Looks like more Communist propaganda.

 

[SBUS-CXK]

LOL

No, it doesn't make him Nepalese.

Mother Teresa abused children? What's your source?

Indus Valley Civilization straddles Western India and Pakistan. As if you would give up your claim to Indus Valley Civilization if your country included East Pakistan which has nothing to do with the IVC. Akbar, Shah Jahan were Indian rulers with capitals in Delhi - the fact that remote parts of the Mughal Empire included parts of Pakistan doesn't make them Pakistani.

Panini, Kanishka, Porus are obviously from areas in present day Pakistan - you are free to celebrate them - not that you do so. They are of Indic heritage - but it doesn't make them Indian.


Looks like more Communist propaganda.

LOL, tell me this is the propaganda of superpower 2012! India and Vietnam are more advanced than Iraq.

Don't think too much. The Chinese only look down on India and Vietnam.

 

[Jackdaws]

LOL, tell me this is the propaganda of superpower 2012! India and Vietnam are more advanced than Iraq.

Don't think too much. The Chinese only look down on India and Vietnam.

Another nonsensical post which doesn't make an iota of sense. What a surprise. Or not.

But I have faith in the simple minded Chinese. Try again. I am sure you can type a comprehensible post.

 

[Kai Liu]

india+vn, great combination!
Let's take a look at what the capitals of these two SPs are like today...

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Another nonsensical post which doesn't make an iota of sense. What a surprise. Or not.

But I have faith in the simple minded Chinese. Try again. I am sure you can type a comprehensible post.

I think. To treat Indians and Vietnamese, is it necessary to be serious????

Don't forget, you've been using Fantasies for debate. I'm just following your logic. Let you see how ridiculous you are.

Please remember this thread - India wants to.....

 

[Viva_Viet]

Another nonsensical post which doesn't make an iota of sense. What a surprise. Or not.

But I have faith in the simple minded Chinese. Try again. I am sure you can type a comprehensible post.

Just ignore that Xi's slave bro. Dont your waste time, just relax and enjoy US slapping more sanction on CN.

In 2023, u will see CN as broke, starving as they were in 1979 before Deng came and lick JP azz for money even Jap just raped them so hard in WW2

 

[SBUS-CXK]

Just ignore that Xi's slave bro. Dont your waste time, just relax and enjoy US slapping more sanction on CN.

In 2023, u will see CN as broke, starving as they were in 1979 before Deng came and lick JP azz for money even Jap just raped them so hard in WW2

Oh, but in the real world, India and Vietnam still lag far behind Iraq.

@Jackdaws Look at your 5 year old Vietnamese son. There's only a fantasy.

Just ignore that Xi's slave bro. Dont your waste time, just relax and enjoy US slapping more sanction on CN.

In 2023, u will see CN as broke, starving as they were in 1979 before Deng came and lick JP azz for money even Jap just raped them so hard in WW2

Why do Chinese look down on India and Vietnam?

Because you are too backward. No matter how crazy you are. You have not changed the fact —— India and Vietnam are too backward.

You are trying to make your country and your father look strong. But in our real world. India and Vietnam are two rubbish, Even behind Iraq.

I don't know why you are happy, because you are in a fantasy world? Or you feel despair on the reality. Choose to escape?

 

[Kai Liu]

Oh, but in the real world, India and Vietnam still lag far behind Iraq.

@Jackdaws Look at your 5 year old Vietnamese son. There's only a fantasy.


Why do Chinese look down on India and Vietnam?

Because you are too backward. No matter how crazy you are. You have not changed the fact —— India and Vietnam are too backward.

You are trying to make your country and your father look strong. But in our real world. India and Vietnam are two rubbish, Even behind Iraq.

I don't know why you are happy, because you are in a fantasy world? Or you feel despair on the reality. Choose to escape?

Don't bother bro. They can put you into ignore list so they can continue their fantasy and day dreaming...

 

[ZeEa5KPul]

india+vn, great combination!
Let's take a look at what the capitals of these two SPs are like today...

Well, at least they'll feel at home with each other.

 

[rott]

Well, at least they'll feel at home with each other.

Lol, same Feather.

 

[Hamza913]

LOL

No, it doesn't make him Nepalese.

Mother Teresa abused children? What's your source?

Indus Valley Civilization straddles Western India and Pakistan. As if you would give up your claim to Indus Valley Civilization if your country included East Pakistan which has nothing to do with the IVC. Akbar, Shah Jahan were Indian rulers with capitals in Delhi - the fact that remote parts of the Mughal Empire included parts of Pakistan doesn't make them Pakistani.

Panini, Kanishka, Porus are obviously from areas in present day Pakistan - you are free to celebrate them - not that you do so. They are of Indic heritage - but it doesn't make them Indian.

Yes, it does. He's not Hindustani. Living somewhere doesn't make you from there. By that logic, I was Qatari about a year ago.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/sep/20/raekhaprasad.lukeharding
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/mother-teresa-myth_n_2805697?guccounter=1

It started in and was mostly based around Pakistan. Very minor portions of Hindustan were part of the civilisation.

Akbar was born in Sindh and Shah Jahan was born in Lahore, they are Pakistani. Lahore has more Mughal monuments than any city in Hindustan, many Pakistanis are descended from migrants during these Islamic conquests, and most importantly they were Muslim, not Hindu. They literally persecuted members of other faiths, they are not yours.

"not that you do so" HAHAHA I'm from Jhelum (well, not entirely but that's irrelevant) and I know for a fact that Porus is held in high regard there as well as in neighbouring areas.

Nobody cares about Kanishka or Panini though, you're right about that. But that doesn't make them Hindustani.

 

[Jackdaws]

Yes, it does. He's not Hindustani. Living somewhere doesn't make you from there. By that logic, I was Qatari about a year ago.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2000/sep/20/raekhaprasad.lukeharding
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/mother-teresa-myth_n_2805697?guccounter=1

It started in and was mostly based around Pakistan. Very minor portions of Hindustan were part of the civilisation.

Akbar was born in Sindh and Shah Jahan was born in Lahore, they are Pakistani. Lahore has more Mughal monuments than any city in Hindustan, many Pakistanis are descended from migrants during these Islamic conquests, and most importantly they were Muslim, not Hindu. They literally persecuted members of other faiths, they are not yours.

"not that you do so" HAHAHA I'm from Jhelum (well, not entirely but that's irrelevant) and I know for a fact that Porus is held in high regard there as well as in neighbouring areas.

Nobody cares about Kanishka or Panini though, you're right about that. But that doesn't make them Hindustani.

Nah - living somewhere makes you an expat. Naturalizing somewhere makes you from that place.

The fact that they were Muslims is irrelevant. In fact Akbar was not even Muslim, he practiced a faith he called Din-e-Elahi. But their religion is of little importance. Bhagat Singh is an Indian hero - but he could be a Pakistani hero too. He was born a Sikh, but died an atheist.

The amount of area of the IVC falling in India and Pakistan is evenly divided. As I said, would you give up your claim to IVC if East Pakistan still formed part of Pakistani State?

Jinnah considered himself a Bombay boy and asked Nehru not to sell his bungalow in Bombay so he could return there. Manmohan Singh was born in present day Pakistan as was Advani. Does that make them Pakistanis? Musharaf was born in India. Does that make him Indian?

Point is choice, not chance. You are what you choose to be.

Anyways, you seem to hate India and Indians - so you are entitled to your views. I don't hate Pakistanis or Pakistan and believe and hope that there will be a peaceful subcontinent in my lifetime. I don't think very highly of China and doubt they are capable of much good.

 

[Hamza913]

Nah - living somewhere makes you an expat. Naturalizing somewhere makes you from that place.

The fact that they were Muslims is irrelevant. In fact Akbar was not even Muslim, he practiced a faith he called Din-e-Elahi. But their religion is of little importance. Bhagat Singh is an Indian hero - but he could be a Pakistani hero too. He was born a Sikh, but died an atheist.

The amount of area of the IVC falling in India and Pakistan is evenly divided. As I said, would you give up your claim to IVC if East Pakistan still formed part of Pakistani State?

Jinnah considered himself a Bombay boy and asked Nehru not to sell his bungalow in Bombay so he could return there. Manmohan Singh was born in present day Pakistan as was Advani. Does that make them Pakistanis? Musharaf was born in India. Does that make him Indian?

Point is choice, not chance. You are what you choose to be.

Anyways, you seem to hate India and Indians - so you are entitled to your views. I don't hate Pakistanis or Pakistan and believe and hope that there will be a peaceful subcontinent in my lifetime. I don't think very highly of China and doubt they are capable of much good.

No it doesn't. That just means you assimilated properly into the society.

It's VERY relevant, especially if they persecuted others for not being Muslim. Islam is more than just a religion, it's an entire ideology for rules of almost every stretch of life, and being Muslim means that someone from another country who is Muslim should be considered closer to you than someone from the same land as you who is a Kafir. This has been the case with most Muslim rulers throughout history, including the Mughals (even apostate Akbar preferred to surround himself with fellow Muslims of different ethnicities).

Irrelevant, most of Hindustan isn't part of IVC where as most of Pakistan is. It also started in southern Pakistan.

East Pakistan never had a claim to IVC, only the West. East Pakistan was never really part of Pakistan anyway, it was more of a glorified colony.

Pakistan is a nation for Muslims of South Asia who believe that Muslims are different enough to the rest of South Asia to deserve their own homeland. Musharraf and Jinnah both fall into this category and are therefore both Pakistani. Anyone else who falls into this category is also Pakistani (as well as anyone born within the geographical boundaries of Pakistan).

Of course I hate Hindustan, however, I don't hate all Hindustanis. You are not a monolith, some of you are good and others are bad.

We can have peace as soon as all of Kashmir is independent from Hindustan and Hindustan ceases it's aggression against Pakistan as well as Muslims in general. Until then, the goal is to fight until one of us is destroyed.

China is certainly more capable than Hindustan, currently anyway.