What's new

India voices concern over US arms for Pakistan

pkd

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
1,432
Reaction score
0
India voices concern over US arms for Pakistan

WASHINGTON: US arms supplies to Pakistan will top the agenda when Indian officials come to Washington in June for the first India-US strategic dialogue, the US-based Indian media reported on Sunday.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Indian External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna will lead their respective delegations to the dialogue which is expected to follow the pattern set during the US-Pakistan strategic talks last week.

The Indian media reported that the prospect of a US nuclear deal for Pakistan was less of a concern for New Delhi than Washington’s decision to provide sophisticated military equipment to Islamabad.

“With the first lot of 18 F-16C/D Block 50/52 combat aircraft due to be delivered in the next few months, India is raising the diplomatic pitch against the transfer of such equipment to Pakistan,” said one such report.

The report noted that Indian Defence Minister A.K. Antony had already articulated New Delhi’s concerns; the US decision also had intensified “diplomatic traffic” between New Delhi and Washington over the issue.

Apart from the F-16s worth $1.43 billion, the US is also financing $477 million (of $891 million) for almost 60 mid-life update kits for its older fleet of F-16s A/B combat aircraft and financing part of 115 M-109 self-propelled howitzers.

Under the “Excess Defence Articles,” which allows US allies to collect weapons no longer needed by US forces in a war zone, Pakistan will receive one ex-Oliver Hazard Perry class missile frigate (worth $67 million) as well as 20 AH-1F Cobra attack helicopters (worth $48 million of which 12 have already been delivered) and 121 refurbished TOW missile launchers.

The US has already given 5,250 TOW anti-armour missiles to Pakistan.

After the US-Pakistan strategic dialogue, Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi said these military supplies would be expedited.

Since 2001, Pakistan has received 14 F-16s (as part of an earlier deal) and 39 T-37 military trainer jets. Under the compensation scheme for the terror war, under which the US pays Pakistan to fight terrorists, the US has transferred $7.2 billion to Pakistan since 2002.

According to official US figures, this is set to spike by $3.4 billion for the coming year. The US administration has also asked its Congress for more money to Pakistan this year.
 
. . .
What took them so long.......I was expecting this two days ago.
 
.
Its a traditional stance that both India and Pakistan take when the other one meets up with an inportant global player.. An interesting quip from Indian media. Enclosing the initial part of the article

========================================
Senator Jesse Helms, the then chairman of the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee, introduced the then Pakistan prime minister Benazir Bhutto [ Images ], to the Senate as the 'prime minister of India' [ Images ]. When everyone laughed, Helms said, 'It is her fault. She has been talking to me for the last one hour and it was all about India, not a word about Pakistan.'
Hillary Clinton [ Images ] might have gathered the impression that Shah Mahmood Qureshi was the foreign minister of India, considering that he too had more to talk about India than about Pakistan.

Qureshi talked about the strategic alliance between India and the United States, the India-US nuclear deal, the use of water in India, the Indian presence in Afghanistan and Jammu and Kashmir [ Images ].

The dominating presence of a general in full regalia was the only sign that it was not an Indian delegation that was holding a dialogue in Washington.
====================================================

Kayani and Qureshi did not go empty handed: Rediff.com India News
 
.
Hillary Clinton [ Images ] might have gathered the impression that Shah Mahmood Qureshi was the foreign minister of India, considering that he too had more to talk about India than about Pakistan.
isnt it exactly what manmohan singh was doing in his visit to US:undecided:
 
.
Its a traditional stance that both India and Pakistan take when the other one meets up with an inportant global player.. An interesting quip from Indian media. Enclosing the initial part of the article

========================================
Senator Jesse Helms, the then chairman of the United States Senate Foreign Relations Committee, introduced the then Pakistan prime minister Benazir Bhutto [ Images ], to the Senate as the 'prime minister of India' [ Images ]. When everyone laughed, Helms said, 'It is her fault. She has been talking to me for the last one hour and it was all about India, not a word about Pakistan.'
Hillary Clinton [ Images ] might have gathered the impression that Shah Mahmood Qureshi was the foreign minister of India, considering that he too had more to talk about India than about Pakistan.

Qureshi talked about the strategic alliance between India and the United States, the India-US nuclear deal, the use of water in India, the Indian presence in Afghanistan and Jammu and Kashmir [ Images ].

The dominating presence of a general in full regalia was the only sign that it was not an Indian delegation that was holding a dialogue in Washington.
====================================================

Kayani and Qureshi did not go empty handed: Rediff.com India News

Banezir Bhutto and Shah Mehmood Qureshi are representatives of the country who has to address concerns and hopes we have from them and countries where they influence. Your memory is so short and you forgot to analyze yourself. Just to help you bit, Holbrook and Adm. Mike Mullen visited India and while sitting in India, before Indian Press, 8 questions in total were asked and surprisingly, only 1 was about India and 7 were about Pakistan. Were Holbrook and Mullen sitting in Pakistan before Pakistani Press then?
 
.

but india does this drama too!! just as if out of no where pakistan acquired 500 AMRAAMs! india finalized its Phalcon deal way long ago & pakistan purchased 500 amraams not the minute we saw the first phalcon land!!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
guys... please read my post.. That's exactly what I said.. It's done both ways..

"Its a traditional stance that both India and Pakistan take when the other one meets up with an inportant global player"

Same is exemplified in the article whose link i posted...
 
.
wat took them soo long
5c9d52ef7e5d9dafc71270524af94b63.jpg
 
.
guys... please read my post.. That's exactly what I said.. It's done both ways..

"Its a traditional stance that both India and Pakistan take when the other one meets up with an inportant global player"

Same is exemplified in the article whose link i posted...
Never heard such news from our side :disagree:
 
.
Huh Indians

read the following and stop crying man.


India's F-16s more advanced than Pakistan's: Lockheed Martin
PTIMonday, March 29

Dallas: American aerospace giant Lockheed Martin today assured India that the F-16s being offered to it would be "much more advanced" than the fighters provided to Pakistan "I can assure you, the Super Viper is much more advanced in all aspects than the F-16s being given to Pakistan," Lockheed Martin's vice president-Business Development (India) Orville Prins told a group of visiting Indian journalists here.

The assurance comes in the wake of reports that India was concerned over US supplying a new set of F-16s to Pakistan, a decision which could be a crucial geopolitical factor when the Indian Air Force (IAF) decides on the $10 billion Medium Multi-role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) tender, described as 'mother of all deals'.

"The F-16IN Super Viper will be more advanced than the F-16 Block 60 that were delivered to the UAE recently. The fighter jets being given to Pakistan by the US government are F-16 Block 50/52 aircraft," Prins said here.

However, the official said he would not discuss anything more about the company's dealings with Pakistan, except the fact that it was not the firm that was selling anything to any country, but was just partnering with the US Air Force.

"We don't sell, the US government does. We only support the US government's decisions," he said when queried about the US military support to Pakistan in the form of a set of 18 new F-16 fighters.

In fact, Prins tried to defend the military sale of his company's fighter jets to Pakistan despite India's protest, saying it was not just Lockheed Martin that was supplying to Islamabad, but all the six contenders in the MMRCA race were, either directly or indirectly.

Other bidders in the MMRCA deal were US' Boeing, French D'Assault, Swedish Gripen, European consortium EADS, and Russian MiG.

The programme to deliver 18 F-16s to Pakistan, named as 'Peace Drive I', will raise the total number of F-16s ordered by Pakistan to 54.

The 'Peace Drive I' order is for 12 F-16Cs and six F-16Ds, all powered by the Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 engine and these would be delivered by end of 2010.

India's F-16s more advanced than Pakistan's: Lockheed Martin - dnaindia.com
 
.
Huh Indians

read the following and stop crying man.

Crying????? No one here is crying here lady. Just some news flashes does not refer to as crying ....raising concern is not called crying....otherwise going by your logic..... Pakistan cries almost 365 days of the year...on e everything related to India.
 
.
Huh Indians

read the following and stop crying man.


India's F-16s more advanced than Pakistan's: Lockheed Martin
PTIMonday, March 29

India's F-16s more advanced than Pakistan's: Lockheed Martin - dnaindia.com

As most Pakistani members say here.. too little .. too late...:azn:

jokes apart, F 16 was never in contention anyway.... Just the association by name with the Pakistan's front line fighter would be too much for the Pakistan haters in the Indian establishment...


Also the recent news of F 16's being used as target drones by USAF was the last nail in F 16's candidature.. I mean, what ever the reality and F 16's capabilities, the opposition parties in India would take the govt to cleaners.. Can you even imaging the India TV headlines....:rofl::rofl:
 
.
The issue is not advanced, the issue is that USA continues to directly arm two neighbours, earlier in teh cold war era this was a tit for tat reply to Russia's supply to India.

But right now, they are willing to offer us anything we ask for , but at the same time shamingly arms its most potent neighbour.

or vice versa for a Paksitani.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom