Same thing as Modi's statements, go down the toilet.
His statements translate actually into reality. He is the "BIG Man" in his office, bose of his party and boss of the government.
Army generals don't dominate his decisions and even his closest friends could not guess what goes in his mind. He is the official boss of 1/6th of world's humanity.
A: it is not necessary to have similar technology to disable the satellite, An anti-satellite weapon, or ASAT, is anything that destroys or physically damages a satellite. That's the broad definition.
ASATs take many shapes, but the clearest examples follow kinetic-kill models, in which an object in space or on the ground is sent to collide with an orbiting satellite, destroying both object and target with the energy of the crash.
But an ASAT doesn't need to be airborne. "If the intent is to stop the transmission of information from the satellite to the ground, taking out the ground station achieves the same goal, without the space debris.
Or a maneuverable satellite could be directed to smash into another satellite, too.
OR a laser, if used to "temporarily dazzle or permanently 'blind' a satellite by destroying its sensors," would also be considered an ASAT weapon, keeping in view Pak china relations it is possible that in near future pakistan could have a similar anti satellite laser base to deal with the threat as china has in xinjiang
AFAIK both of these technologies exist with India but not either is there with Pakistan.
We have DL variants of PSLV & GSLV what we have been testing for a while can implant their upper stages in orbit after putting satellite in orbit as a killer orbiter against the target satellite. For geostationary orbit, India's payload assist module upper stage can be added.
Similarly, India has DEWs too. Though bigger lasers like KALI & DURGA will have to be used, they have to be amplified for shooting down a satellite.
Shooting down a satellite with a laser is relatively difficult because of scattering. Currently, India's operational lasers are only for stunning human eyes for mob control and a few systems for shooting down drones are in development. Shooting down planes and satellites is a decade away at least.
I repeat, these technologies take decades and even if Pakistan manages to acquire them from somewhere, SSLV will make them useless.
B: if Pakistan is not important why these days entire indian politics revolving around anti Pakistani sentiments ????
Entire doesn't. It's a chapter which sometimes beefs up while sometimes calms down.
It has historical reasons. The pain of partition of homeland and the lose of loved ones in the hands of jihadis justifies.
I've lost someone I really loved in a similar peaceful jihadi attack and I'm ready to blow myself with jihadis if my goverment orders me. Enough is enough.
Islam is an Arabic religion and has nothing to do with Indian subcontinent.
for last two month modi is selling the anti pakistani CHOORAN to its public ...
I have been repeating same thing over & over.
Indian hate for Pakistan is totally different from Pakistani hate for India.
Indians don't get excited by this
"rivalry" in the
"region". They aren't in any arms race. India alone forms 74% of population, 76% of area and 80% of economy of the Indian Subcontinent and being the sole real regional power and fulcrum of the region. Plus if there was any arms race, India won it long long ago while it was trying to match great powers.
Unlike Pakistan, the self proclaimed regional power withou any capabilities beyond its borders, India can mobilze military not only anywhere in Southern Asia but entire Indian Ocean region and can only be challenged by powers from outside world.
Indians actually hate Pakistan. The only two Pakistani things they are worried about Pakistani nukes and Pakistani terrorists with nukes. They look it down, not racing with it.
We aren't competing with you,
we aren't your rival, we are your enemy. Sooner you realize, better it will be for you.
and war is all about making it expensive to enemy otherwise russians were second largest military power when they were collapsed
Off course, its expensive for Pakistan only. India's defense budget is as low as 1.46% of GDP and still going down.
Second, Soviet was matching US in every field. Pakistan is only investing in deterrents which ensure its existence. Soviet economy was even substantial against that of America and military in numbers was close in size. Same is not true for Pakistan against India. We are nothing like US-USSR/France-Germany. We are more like Russia and the Ukraine.
And the pace at which gap between India and Pakistan is growing, India will be far more powerful than Pakistan in upcoming decades, far far more powerful than its today.
https://www.dawn.com/news/1437762
India's gradually growing aggressive stance is proportional to its power. India was dominant in bilateral issues in 2010s unlike being same in 1990s. From now on, it will be more aggressive too with time.
