What's new

India to strengthen army deployment in Arunachal

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
Sanat Mukherjee, Kolkata

Nov 12: In order to strengthen its defence in the country's extreme northeast corner, India was planning to double the present troop strength along the China border. Presently, Indian army's IV corps, consisted of 2nd, 5th and 21st Mountain Divisions, was headquartered at Tezpur in Assam.

Quoting an anonymous senior Indian defence official, New Delhi-based newspapers said that the Indian army decided that it would position its new 15,000-strong 56 division in Arunachal Pradesh, which China claimed as its own, within four weeks.

Simultaneously, it had put out a Request for Information (RFI) for acquiring 300 lightweight tanks that could be deployed in the North East and Jammu & Kashmir.

The Army strategists claimed that the army's lightweight tanks were capable of destroying bunkers and soft-skin vehicles up to 3,000-metre away and should have armour-piercing anti-tank guided missiles and anti-aircraft machine guns. It was learnt, the RFI inserted specific condition that these ordered tanks should "have protection against nuclear, chemical and biological warfare".
In recent months, India activated three airfields along the 646 km Line of Actual Control (LAC) with China, last used during the 1962 war with China. The army and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police have also stepped up patrolling along the LAC.

Main purpose of India's new initiative in the northeast was reportedly to tighten its defences along the Sino-India border in Arunachal Pradesh. Although, New Delhi had not made any official statement about its concerns regarding China's military build up near international borders, it wanted to ensure of not getting caught napping to safeguard its national territorial integrity.

The reports further say, 'the government was making a fast move to deploy more troops along sensitive borders adjoining China, especially in Arunachal Pradesh. However, on the diplomatic front, New Delhi had constantly downplayed concerns and fears that there were some serious differences between the two nuclear-powered states and that the Sino-India ties were souring slowly.'

As already reported that India had recently operationalised three airfields along the 646- km Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Arunachal Pradesh with China, which had remained non-operational since the 1962 war with China. Besides, The Indian Air Force (IAF) had to station Sukhoi-30 MKI aircraft in the Northeast in Tezpur besides detailing aircraft at Chabua in Assam, close to Arunachal Pradesh.
According to www.starpots.com, this step was also taken to give a robust push towards infrastructure in Arunachal Pradesh. A defence official said, "Naturally, we can't just send 60,000 troops there and then expect them to get on without infrastructure. That infrastructure in terms of roads and bases for communication, transport and maintaining a presence will be built up too."

:: The Daily Independent Bangladesh :.. Internet Edition
 
.
It's not to tighten the defense, but stress. Enjoy it, Indian friends.

Oh, please build more infrastructures there for the convenience of both our troops in the future. Thanks in advance.
 
.
It's not to tighten the defense, but stress. Enjoy it, Indian friends.

Oh, please build more infrastructures there for the convenience of both our troops in the future. Thanks in advance.

"WELCOME" we have four wall surrounded pow centre recently built for your troop:angel:
 
.
"WELCOME" we have four wall surrounded pow centre recently built for your troop:angel:

Nothing new, we have those built for your army boys way back in

1962. :smitten::pakistan::china:

P.S. More India army deployed= More target practice for PLA's next

cake walk, thanks. :smitten::pakistan::china:
 
.
Nothing new, we have those built for your army boys way back in

1962. :smitten::pakistan::china:

P.S. More India army deployed= More target practice for PLA's next

cake walk, thanks. :smitten::pakistan::china:

Things have changed a lot over past 4 and a half decades. But sure you would not know that. As you are busy believing that everything is the same. Keep on thinking what makes you comfortable. We shall see what happens in a real conflict, when the time comes.


Reverse PS :More PLA deployed= More target practice for India Army next
 
.
Things have changed a lot over past 4 and a half decades. But sure you would not know that. As you are busy believing that everything is the same. Keep on thinking what makes you comfortable. We shall see what happens in a real conflict, when the time comes.


Reverse PS :More PLA deployed= More target practice for India Army next

First of all, no offensive remarking here. I am just posting numbers.

Yes things changed a lot in the past 4 and half decades. However, by all means, the gap only widened and is continuing to widen.

I am just going to quote an earlier post here:

China GDP 1962 : $ 46,464,000,000.00 ;

India's GDP 1962 : $ 41,222,660,000.00

China = 112% India
--------------------------------------

2008:

China: 4,327,448,000,000

India: 1,206,684,000,000

China = 358.6% India

---------------------------------------------
Literacy rate :

China: 93.3
India: 61.0
---------------------------------------------
Average IQ

China: 100
India: 80 (IQ < 70 is classified as mental retardation)
----------------------------------------------
Military Spending 2009:

China: 89 billion
India: 30 billion
China = 296% India
----------------------------------------------
India airforce - the highest crash rate in the world
http://www.zimbio.com/Indian+Armed+...ndian+Air+Force+unable+minimize+highest+Crash

A vanishing gap? I am sorry but India's only chance is suing for peace.
 
Last edited:
.
Yes things changed a lot in the past 4 and half decades. However, by all means, the gap only widened and is continuing to widen.

Considering the number of adverseries China has, the numbers are bound to be bigger than India which has traditionallly has two adverseries Pakistan and China.

China has bigger army because China has more enemies and more land to defend.

Here is a list of wars faught by china.
WHKMLA : List of the Wars of China

Considering the number of wars China has faught. A huge arny is a must.
 
.
First of all, no offensive remarking here. I am just posting numbers.

Yes things changed a lot in the past 4 and half decades. However, by all means, the gap only widened and is continuing to widen.

I am just going to quote an earlier post here:

China GDP 1962 : $ 46,464,000,000.00 ;

India's GDP 1962 : $ 41,222,660,000.00

China = 112&#37; India
--------------------------------------

2008:

China: 4,327,448,000,000

India: 1,206,684,000,000

China = 358.6% India

---------------------------------------------
Literacy rate :

China: 93.3
India: 61.0
---------------------------------------------
Average IQ

China: 100
India: 80 (IQ < 70 is classified as mental retardation)
----------------------------------------------
Military Spending 2009:

China: 89 billion
India: 30 billion
China = 296% India
----------------------------------------------
India airforce - the highest crash rate in the world
The Indian Air Force unable to minimize the highest Crash rate in the world - Indian Armed Forces - Zimbio

A vanishing gap? I am sorry but India's only chance is suing for peace.

Are you insisting that China will do an aggressive move? (no possibility as of now)
Indians are in a position to defend their land where attackers need more numbers to counter plus there is an added disadvantage of cutting of supply lines by air strikes :cheers:
 
.
Considering the number of adverseries China has, the numbers are bound to be bigger than India which has traditionallly has two adverseries Pakistan and China.

China has bigger army because China has more enemies and more land to defend.

Here is a list of wars faught by china.
WHKMLA : List of the Wars of China

Considering the number of wars China has faught. A huge arny is a must.

Just quoting your link:


Chinese occupation of Tibet (This is just an extension of the civil war)
Korean War
Tibetan Rebellion (Very small, much smaller than the Maoist in India)
First Taiwan Straits Crisis (Not a war)
Sino-Burmese border War
Second Taiwan Straits Crisis (Again, no war)
Tibetan Rebellion (Not a war. A small rebellion of less than 1000)
Chinese incursions into Indian territory (This is not a war. Nihal's forward policy ring a bell?)
Sino-Indian War
Cultural Revolution (NOT A WAR)
Sino-Soviet border clash
Sino-Vietnamese War
Tienanmen Massacre (NOT A WAR)
Third Taiwan Straits Crisis (NOT A WAR)

Meanwhile, here is India's list:

Major Wars
First Indo-Pak war, 1947
Operation Polo, 1948
Invasion of Goa, 1961
Sino-Indian war, 1962
Second Indo-Pak war, 1965
The Chola Incident
Third Indo-Pak war, 1971

Siachin war, 1984
Kargil war, 1999, Operation VIJAY

Other Operations
Sri Lanka mission, 1987–1990
Operation Cactus, 1988

---------- Post added at 07:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 AM ----------

Are you insisting that China will do an aggressive move? (no possibility as of now)
Indians are in a position to defend their land where attackers need more numbers to counter plus there is an added disadvantage of cutting of supply lines by air strikes :cheers:

I am pretty sure it will be the Indians who start the conflict :cheers:
 
.
First of all, no offensive remarking here. I am just posting numbers.

Yes things changed a lot in the past 4 and half decades. However, by all means, the gap only widened and is continuing to widen.

I am just going to quote an earlier post here:

China GDP 1962 : $ 46,464,000,000.00 ;

India's GDP 1962 : $ 41,222,660,000.00

China = 112&#37; India
--------------------------------------

2008:

China: 4,327,448,000,000

India: 1,206,684,000,000

China = 358.6% India

---------------------------------------------
Literacy rate :

China: 93.3
India: 61.0
---------------------------------------------
Average IQ

China: 100
India: 80 (IQ < 70 is classified as mental retardation)
----------------------------------------------
Military Spending 2009:

China: 89 billion
India: 30 billion
China = 296% India
----------------------------------------------
India airforce - the highest crash rate in the world
The Indian Air Force unable to minimize the highest Crash rate in the world - Indian Armed Forces - Zimbio

A vanishing gap? I am sorry but India's only chance is suing for peace.



Also please spare time to Highlight :

China Area:

Total: 9,596,961 sq km
Country comparison to the world: 4
Land: 9,569,901 sq km
Water: 27,060 sq km


India Area:

Total: 3,287,263 sq km
Country comparison to the world: 7
land: 2,973,193 sq km
Water: 314,070 sq km




China is 300 % bigger than India so it is fairly justified to have 300% Defence budget and Defence forces.


Also:

China Land boundaries:

Total: 22,117 km

Border countries: Afghanistan 76 km, Bhutan 470 km, Burma 2,185 km, India 3,380 km, Kazakhstan 1,533 km, North Korea 1,416 km, Kyrgyzstan 858 km, Laos 423 km, Mongolia 4,677 km, Nepal 1,236 km, Pakistan 523 km, Russia (northeast) 3,605 km, Russia (northwest) 40 km, Tajikistan 414 km, Vietnam 1,281 km.

Regional borders: Hong Kong 30 km, Macau 0.34 km

Youve got more border to defend so you need more Budget and Army.
 
.
Just quoting your link:


Chinese occupation of Tibet (This is just an extension of the civil war)
Korean War
Tibetan Rebellion (Very small, much smaller than the Maoist in India)
First Taiwan Straits Crisis (Not a war)
Sino-Burmese border War
Second Taiwan Straits Crisis (Again, no war)
Tibetan Rebellion (Not a war. A small rebellion of less than 1000)
Chinese incursions into Indian territory (This is not a war. Nihal's forward policy ring a bell?)
Sino-Indian War
Cultural Revolution (NOT A WAR)
Sino-Soviet border clash
Sino-Vietnamese War
Tienanmen Massacre (NOT A WAR)
Third Taiwan Straits Crisis (NOT A WAR)

Meanwhile, here is India's list:

Major Wars
First Indo-Pak war, 1947
Operation Polo, 1948
Invasion of Goa, 1961
Sino-Indian war, 1962
Second Indo-Pak war, 1965
The Chola Incident
Third Indo-Pak war, 1971

Siachin war, 1984
Kargil war, 1999, Operation VIJAY

Other Operations
Sri Lanka mission, 1987–1990
Operation Cactus, 1988

---------- Post added at 07:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 AM ----------



I am pretty sure it will be the Indians who start the conflict :cheers:

Then think about countering it or preventing it :wave:
 
.
Also please spare time to Highlight :

China Area:

Total: 9,596,961 sq km
Country comparison to the world: 4
Land: 9,569,901 sq km
Water: 27,060 sq km


India Area:

Total: 3,287,263 sq km
Country comparison to the world: 7
land: 2,973,193 sq km
Water: 314,070 sq km




China is 300 % bigger than India so it is fairly justified to have 300% Defence budget and Defence forces.


Also:

China Land boundaries:

Total: 22,117 km

Border countries: Afghanistan 76 km, Bhutan 470 km, Burma 2,185 km, India 3,380 km, Kazakhstan 1,533 km, North Korea 1,416 km, Kyrgyzstan 858 km, Laos 423 km, Mongolia 4,677 km, Nepal 1,236 km, Pakistan 523 km, Russia (northeast) 3,605 km, Russia (northwest) 40 km, Tajikistan 414 km, Vietnam 1,281 km.

Regional borders: Hong Kong 30 km, Macau 0.34 km

Youve got more border to defend so you need more Budget and Army.

In addition to that China is surrounded by powerful neighbors like japan and USA in the pacific.
 
.
Also please spare time to Highlight :

China Area:

Total: 9,596,961 sq km
Country comparison to the world: 4
Land: 9,569,901 sq km
Water: 27,060 sq km


India Area:

Total: 3,287,263 sq km
Country comparison to the world: 7
land: 2,973,193 sq km
Water: 314,070 sq km




China is 300 % bigger than India so it is fairly justified to have 300% Defence budget and Defence forces.


Also:

China Land boundaries:

Total: 22,117 km

Border countries: Afghanistan 76 km, Bhutan 470 km, Burma 2,185 km, India 3,380 km, Kazakhstan 1,533 km, North Korea 1,416 km, Kyrgyzstan 858 km, Laos 423 km, Mongolia 4,677 km, Nepal 1,236 km, Pakistan 523 km, Russia (northeast) 3,605 km, Russia (northwest) 40 km, Tajikistan 414 km, Vietnam 1,281 km.

Regional borders: Hong Kong 30 km, Macau 0.34 km

Youve got more border to defend so you need more Budget and Army.

Besides the regional borders (they really shouldn't count), I agree that our border is long and needs defending. I think we need to achieve at least half of the U.S level in order to deter possible American aggression (our biggest threat right now. If a lunatic wins the U.S election this will happen)
 
.
Besides the regional borders (they really shouldn't count), I agree that our border is long and needs defending. I think we need to achieve at least half of the U.S level in order to deter possible American aggression (our biggest threat right now. If a lunatic wins the U.S election this will happen)

Got to feel it for Russia, though. Twice as big as China, facing threat from the U.S and its NATO cohorts, and its budget is a pultry 58 billion.
 
.
Just quoting your link:


Chinese occupation of Tibet (This is just an extension of the civil war)
Korean War
Tibetan Rebellion (Very small, much smaller than the Maoist in India)
First Taiwan Straits Crisis (Not a war)
Sino-Burmese border War
Second Taiwan Straits Crisis (Again, no war)
Tibetan Rebellion (Not a war. A small rebellion of less than 1000)
Chinese incursions into Indian territory (This is not a war. Nihal's forward policy ring a bell?)
Sino-Indian War
Cultural Revolution (NOT A WAR)
Sino-Soviet border clash
Sino-Vietnamese War
Tienanmen Massacre (NOT A WAR)
Third Taiwan Straits Crisis (NOT A WAR)

Meanwhile, here is India's list:

Major Wars
First Indo-Pak war, 1947
Operation Polo, 1948
Invasion of Goa, 1961
Sino-Indian war, 1962
Second Indo-Pak war, 1965
The Chola Incident
Third Indo-Pak war, 1971

Siachin war, 1984
Kargil war, 1999, Operation VIJAY

Other Operations
Sri Lanka mission, 1987–1990
Operation Cactus, 1988

I am pretty sure it will be the Indians who start the conflict :cheers:

Are you suggesting that India has more war experience than Chinese? Isn't it a PLUS point? :victory:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom