What's new

India to send more troops to Afghanistan

yes indeed its terrible and SAD.





no its different. Different source, different news agency different words... not at all the same..
:china::china::china::china:


HaHa, thanks for your useful informations, eventhough i had hard

time with your links, lets made a little comparision, OK ?

UNICEF - India - Statistics
Statistics
Basic indicator | Nutrition | Health | HIV AIDS | Education | Demographic Indicators | Economic indicators | Women | Child Protection | The Rate of Progress

Basic indicator
to the top

Under-5 mortality rank
49

Under-5 mortality rate, 1990
116

Under-5 mortality rate, 2008
69

Infant mortality rate (under 1), 1990
83

Infant mortality rate (under 1), 2008
52

Neonatal mortality rate, 2004
39

Total population (thousands), 2008
1181412

Annual no. of births (thousands), 2008
26913


Annual no. of under-5 deaths (thousands), 2008
1830


GNI per capita (US$), 2008
1070

Life expectancy at birth (years), 2008
64

Total adult literacy rate (%), 2003–2008*
66

Primary school net enrolment/ attendance (%), 2003–2008*
83

% share of household income 2000–2007*, lowest 40%
19

% share of household income 2000–2007*, highest 20%
45


UNICEF - China - Statistics

Statistics
Basic indicator | Nutrition | Health | HIV AIDS | Education | Demographic Indicators | Economic indicators | Women | Child Protection | The Rate of Progress

Basic indicator
to the top

Under-5 mortality rank
102

Under-5 mortality rate, 1990
46

Under-5 mortality rate, 2008
21

Infant mortality rate (under 1), 1990
37

Infant mortality rate (under 1), 2008
18

Neonatal mortality rate, 2004
18

Total population (thousands), 2008
1337411

Annual no. of births (thousands), 2008
18134

Annual no. of under-5 deaths (thousands), 2008
365


GNI per capita (US$), 2008
2770

Life expectancy at birth (years), 2008
73

Total adult literacy rate (%), 2003–2008*
93

Primary school net enrolment/ attendance (%), 2003–2008*
100

% share of household income 2000–2007*, lowest 40%
16

% share of household income 2000–2007*, highest 20%
48

I must say, impressive statistic, congratulation to your great

achievements.

Shall we concluded we simply not belong to the same "League" ?

:smitten::pakistan::china:
 
.
:undecided: whats there to get angerd?? Its a fact that Indian was so much happy that it would be part of new plan for Afghanistan and was eagerly looking forward to London Conference But its a big reality that India was kicked out of the entire plan.
Again ........"kicked out"!!!!!!!!!

OK dont get angry if we call you one from Begging bowl of world or terrorist state.....

We dont expect good logic or honest opinion atleast you can be docile while discussing.....
 
.
Yes, this desperate stance is required to have a global economy. It is difficult for many of the Pakistanis here, because it seems you haven't enjoyed globalisation.

ZANA, I am dying to know your profession, I can't imagine people being so ignorant.

This is how the system works, Read FDIs before you post again.. If you have problem, then go cry to your mama or stop us from doing it. Don't ejaculate your frustration here.
 
.
Again ........"kicked out"!!!!!!!!!

OK dont get angry if we call you one from Begging bowl of world or terrorist state.....

We dont expect good logic or honest opinion atleast you can be docile while discussing.....

arre bhai, relax, let people believe what they want to believe :)

If india was 'kicked out', then there would not have been that attack in kabul and india would not be sending in more troops ;)

Whats important is that 'quetta shura' and baradar were caught and mohammed haqqani was killed because 'india was kicked out'. You see they need something to feed their population gone numb from the bomb blasts, let them have it, be humane.

And don't underestimate the glaobalisation, most of things fed actually come from abroad, comforting news included ;)
 
Last edited:
.
Again ........"kicked out"!!!!!!!!!

OK dont get angry if we call you one from Begging bowl of world or terrorist state.....

We dont expect good logic or honest opinion atleast you can be docile while discussing.....

:rofl: well my dear if you say so that doesnt make us the ones you think. Whereas its a fact that India was Kicked out/Left OUT in the current Afghan scheme.
 
.
Yes, this desperate stance is required to have a global economy. It is difficult for many of the Pakistanis here, because it seems you haven't enjoyed globalisation.

ZANA, I am dying to know your profession, I can't imagine people being so ignorant.

This is how the system works, Read FDIs before you post again.. If you have problem, then go cry to your mama or stop us from doing it. Don't ejaculate your frustration here.

Are you Bengali ?


What does FDI has to do with Indian designs viz a viz Afghanistan
 
. . .
What FDI of Afghanistan has to do with Indian moves for strategic interests there:undecided: or with this thread

Its related because, there is no strategic interest for India, but a motive to invest there in infrastructure development...
 
.
What FDI of Afghanistan has to do with Indian moves for strategic interests there:undecided: or with this thread

ur country can also have any amt of investment there,we dont have any problem,but dont brag abt what we should do or not
 
.
And if you had followed the media, India did not cry over death of its "9" (You can read teh figure upside down too as claimed by India) nationals. Not much projection nor protest as had been the norm in the past.

Indian media did cover it, btw they also thought ISI has a hand!!! You must have missed the article, its not always easy to read so many Indian news papers in a day. Even we Indians don't do it
 
.
Lolzzz the frustration is seen only among Indians :) you guys are runing towards Saudia after losing the chance as you were kicked out of Afghan affair in the London Conference recently.


As far as Indian forces in Afghanistan, well my dear Bharatiyas that would be good for Pakistan and our stance :)

Ya right!!! India did not do anything on economic cooperation at all with these countries they just spoke about Pakistan, btw talking about economics and since you claimed India is getting frustrated, what do you think about this news piece?

"
Over $400 million in reimbursement claims by Pakistan under Coalition Support Fund (CSF) for 2008 have been rejected by the United States because of new guidelines requiring ‘enhanced oversight and accountability’.
"

Dawn: Wednesday, 03 Mar, 2010
DAWN.COM | Front Page | Pakistan loses $400m to ?enhanced oversight?
 
.
Indian media did cover it, btw they also thought ISI has a hand!!! You must have missed the article, its not always easy to read so many Indian news papers in a day. Even we Indians don't do it

When was the last time that Indians or Indian media did not blame Pakistan for even for the death of a fly.
 
.
Whats up with the Pakistani members?
Why complain about India? You wanna invest, go ahead, do your bit and then you can boast.

You don't need to worry about India. India will invest and help the Afghans and you cannot stop it. So why rant in the first place?

You do what you can do. We do what we can do.

Let Afghans make up their mind. They'll let us know which of us they prefer.
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom