What's new

India to overtake China in seven years, says UN report

tw00tw00

BANNED
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
840
Reaction score
1
Country
Singapore
Location
United States
http://www.firstpost.com/world/indi...ry-in-seven-years-says-un-report-3732925.html

United Nations: India's population is expected to surpass China's in about seven years and Nigeria is projected to overtake the US to become the third most populous country in the world shortly before 2050, a UN report said on Wednesday.

The report by the Department of Economic and Social Affairs' Population Division forecasts that the current world population of nearly 7.6 billion will increase to 8.6 billion by 2030, 9.8 billion in 2050 and 11.2 billion in 2100.


Representational image. AFP

It said roughly 83 million people are added to the world's population every year and the upward trend is expected to continue even with a continuing decline in fertility rates, which have fallen steadily since the 1960s.

John Wilmoth, director of the Population Division, said at a news conference that the report includes information on the populations of 233 countries or areas of the world.

"The population in Africa is notable for its rapid rate of growth, and it is anticipated that over half of global population growth between now and 2050 will take place in that region," he said. "At the other extreme, it is expected that the population of Europe will, in fact, decline somewhat in the coming decades."

The UN agency forecasts that from now through 2050 half the world's population growth will be concentrated in just 10 countries — India, Nigeria, Congo, Pakistan, Ethiopia, Tanzania, United States, Uganda and Indonesia. That order is based on the 10 countries' "expected contribution to total growth", the report said.

During the same period, it added, the populations of 26 African countries are expected to at least double. Nigeria, currently the world's seventh largest country, has the fastest growing population of the 10 most populous countries worldwide, and the report projects it will surpass the US shortly before mid-century.

The new projections also forecast that China, which currently has 1.4 billion inhabitants, will be replaced as the world's most populous country around 2024 by India, which now has 1.3 billion inhabitants.

The report, titled 'The World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision', said fertility has been declining in nearly all regions in recent years.

Between 2010 and 2015, Wilmoth said, "The world's women had 2.5 births per woman over a lifetime — but this number varies widely around the world. Europe has the lowest fertility level, estimated at 1.6 births per woman in the most recent period, while Africa has the highest fertility, with around 4.7 births per woman," he said.

The report said birth rates in the 47 least developed countries remain relatively high, with population growth around 2.4 percent a year. While this rate is expected to slow significantly in the coming decades, the UN said the combined population of the 47 countries is projected to increase by 33 percent from roughly 1 billion now to 1.9 billion in 2050.

More and more countries now have fertility rates below the level of roughly 2.1 births per woman needed to replace the current generation, the report said. During the 2010-2015 period, fertility was below the replacement level in 83 countries comprising 46 percent of the world's population, it said.

The 10 most populous countries with low fertility levels are China, United States, Brazil, Russia, Japan, Vietnam, Germany, Iran, Thailand and United Kingdom, the report said.

In addition to slowing population growth, low fertility levels lead to an older population, the report noted. It forecasts that the number of people aged 60 or above will more than double from the current 962 million to 2.1 billion in 2050 and more than triple to 3.1 billion in 2100.

A quarter of Europe's population is already aged 60 or over, and that share is projected to reach 35 percent in 2050 then remain around that level for the rest of the century, the report said.

Published Date: Jun 22, 2017 08:31 am | Updated Date: Jun 22, 2017 08:31 am
 
.
This is more to do with Chinese not reproducing enough. According some reports, Chinese population will decline from the present 1.4 billion to 700 million in next 50 years. Why are Chinese averse to reproduce?
 
.
This is more to do with Chinese not reproducing enough. According some reports, Chinese population will decline from the present 1.4 billion to 700 million in next 50 years. Why are Chinese averse to reproduce?
CCP isn't allowing them to.
 
.
This is more to do with Chinese not reproducing enough. According some reports, Chinese population will decline from the present 1.4 billion to 700 million in next 50 years. Why are Chinese averse to reproduce?
Cause China can't bear to have millions of children born into poverty who would be deprived of proper education, healthcare and work opportunities.
 
.
Cause China can't bear to have millions of children born into poverty who would be deprived of proper education, healthcare and work opportunities.

A healthy reproduction rate is good. Already on an average a Chinese is 10 years older than an average Indian. This age Gap will further increase if you don't reproduce. You require young people to work for your economy. Old people are not productive.
 
. .
A healthy reproduction rate is good. Already on an average a Chinese is 10 years older than an average Indian. This age Gap will further increase if you don't reproduce. You require young people to work for your economy. Old people are not productive.

You need health and well fed, educated, disciplined, hard-working and creative people to work for an advanced economy. Chinese live longer than Indians, so their average age is no doubt older than Indians.
 
.
You need health and well fed, educated, disciplined, hard-working and creative people to work for an advanced economy. Chinese live longer than Indians, so their average age is no doubt older than Indians.

You need young, enterprising and risk taking people for growing your economy. Not well fed old people. Your country's fertility rate is enough to replace people who die. The one child policy dented your future growth forever. The more the older people, the more is the burden on the state and less productive your economy will be.

And how is Chinese living longer than Indians makes the age older than Indians? When you calculate age of the country, you take median and not the mean.
 
.
I hate this aspect of India. We are too many people. Half of them, I am sure are unnecessary burden and are result of degraded quality of rubber.
India should do something at war foot to slow down its population. Leave cities, but in villages stills more hands more earnings is very pre-dominate.
 
.
A healthy reproduction rate is good. Already on an average a Chinese is 10 years older than an average Indian. This age Gap will further increase if you don't reproduce. You require young people to work for your economy. Old people are not productive.
India isn't a well off society with unlimited resource to support ever exponential populations growth.
 
.
You need young, enterprising and risk taking people for growing your economy. Not well fed old people. Your country's fertility rate is enough to replace people who die. The one child policy dented your future growth forever. The more the older people, the more is the burden on the state and less productive your economy will be.

And how is Chinese living longer than Indians makes the age older than Indians? When you calculate age of the country, you take median and not the mean.
Dude, there is no point in argument. These stats are good for debates but we all know we Indians are too many of us.
Tell me which scenario is good?
1. 10 member family 2 person earning Rs 40000 each thus bringing Rs 80000 per month together thus Rs 8000 per person
2. 4 member family 2 person earning Rs 40000 each thus bringing Rs 80000 per month together thus Rs 20000 per person?

We need to take drastic steps to reduce our over burden population.
 
.
India isn't a well off society with unlimited resource to support ever exponential populations growth.

China too was in the same position just ten years ago with an economy of size what is now India's. In fact China was poorer to India just 30 years back. Economic growth can do wonder to uplift poor and make the society well off.
 
.
You need young, enterprising and risk taking people for growing your economy. Not well fed old people. Your country's fertility rate is enough to replace people who die. The one child policy dented your future growth forever. The more the older people, the more is the burden on the state and less productive your economy will be.

And how is Chinese living longer than Indians makes the age older than Indians? When you calculate age of the country, you take median and not the mean.


Being young alone doesn't mean much, as they could very well be the liability rather than asset to a society if there are not enough well paid jobs for them. Don't worry about China, it is moving into Industry 4.0, and the sheer number of cheap laborers is the thing of last century.
 
. .
You need young, enterprising and risk taking people for growing your economy. Not well fed old people. Your country's fertility rate is enough to replace people who die. The one child policy dented your future growth forever. The more the older people, the more is the burden on the state and less productive your economy will be.

And how is Chinese living longer than Indians makes the age older than Indians? When you calculate age of the country, you take median and not the mean.

You also have to realized, in the next few decades, Automation and AI is going to wreck everything in the old economy and you will need well fed, highly educated, and ambitious population to build the new economy because you will no longer need 200,000 workers on assembly lines, only 1,000 to manage the machines.
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom