What's new

India to deploy commandos in Afghanistan

What strategic gain are you talking about? can you be specific what needs to be achieved or
has not been achieved?

If It's about troops, equipment, larger Indian presence then note that Afghanistan Government has been asking for that from India from a long time so were the coalition forces. If it's about investments - the same is being requested by Afghanistan government from a long while.
What really you want to achieve by heavy presence of Indian troops in Afghanistan , Is it as plane that Afghan Government wants indian presence and without having any interest you are going to deploy your force ? Their must be some sort of understanding but based on what , Can they be achieved?
Are you expecting something same from middle east that what you have expected from comparatively smaller countries of South Asia?
Normally countries invest in those sectors where they atleast get some gains in return , But the group you are supporting their itself struggling even under NATO deployment , A isolated region where different groups having different interests . So what you are really going achieve from deployment and further investment?
and what have really achieved with previous investment and intel gathering? You should need reconsider your plans and their outcome instead of shooting in a empty direction.
 
. .
India already has an "Afghan expeditionary force" under the garb of BRO commanded by a Lieut Gen.
 
.
If needed that will also happen.. But the Big question is how Pakistan will counter 3 way threat???

From East India
From North-West : India and Afghanistan
From South-west : Iran (If paksiatn send its troop to kill Shias in Syria)

oh dear they need to deploy army in Karachi also.......to protect karachi
 
.
What really you want to achieve by heavy presence of Indian troops in Afghanistan , Is it as plane that Afghan Government wants indian presence and without having any interest you are going to deploy your force ? Their must be some sort of understanding but based on what , Can they be achieved?
Are you expecting something same from middle east that what you have expected from comparatively smaller countries of South Asia?
Normally countries invest in those sectors where they atleast get some gains in return , But the group you are supporting their itself struggling even under NATO deployment , A isolated region where different groups having different interests . So what you are really going achieve from deployment and further investment?
and what have really achieved with previous investment and intel gathering? You should need reconsider your plans and their outcome instead of shooting in a empty direction.

You said that India hasn't achieved any strategic gain..

Not a single strategic gain they achieved ,

What strategic gain has it not achieved? you need to tell me what are those that weren't achieved, I expect something better than a generic statement from you.

As for the Indian presence - India is looking for a route to CA, also trying to rebuild Afghan society, give humanitarian aid, assist the Afghan govt and its security forces, doesn't want the Taliban to overrun Afghanistan again - in all this India has achieved some level of success.
 
.
Honestly, I think India should send its army into Afghanistan...

205.jpg

Yes, let India send its army to the Hindu Kush, so it can re-visit its glorious history. :angel:

Could not agree more.

Let the hunt begin. The quicker we get rid of them the better.

We must ensure that Afghanistan is not allowed to be used as a means to attack Pakistan nor can we allow the Indians to finance/train our enemies.

Evidently..

s6uWacw.jpg


:argh: you realize who we are and where we came from?

Please dont burst their bubble
 
. .
Don't worry, we will dig in there and wait for the time when all those good talibans become very bad talibans for pakistan. It won't take much time.

Apparently you aren't seem interested to dig in Afghanistan. How sad.
 
.
Apparently you aren't seem interested to dig in Afghanistan. How sad.

Unlike Pakistanis, we dont think of Afghanistan as some kind of personal playground to dig around in.

You guys are free to dig aruond yourselves as much as you want though. Just make sure you dont dig yourself a grave in the process, which you kind of already have...
 
.
the afghan talibans are not na mard like TTP guyz
they attack from front

They are some of the biggest na-mards I have ever seen. they attack their own sisters and daughters. Shoot their own daughter for going to school like malala. Talibans (and the whole people Taliban controlled areas in North Pakistan) are actually the biggest na-mard cowards in the history of this planet.
 
. .
Apparently you aren't seem interested to dig in Afghanistan. How sad.

As I said dear, we will maintain our ties with our good old friends in Afghanistan and wait for talibans to focus their efforts to help their friend Pakistan convert themselves into a country of purest muslims of pious talibani principals. And the fun will began then, as these talibans will be very adamant to help pakistan in their transition to purest islam, and any opposition will be dealt in talibani style. Good luck with your good talibans.
 
.
You said that India hasn't achieved any strategic gain..



What strategic gain has it not achieved? you need to tell me what are those that weren't achieved, I expect something better than a generic statement from you.

As for the Indian presence - India is looking for a route to CA, also trying to rebuild Afghan society, give humanitarian aid, assist the Afghan govt and its security forces, doesn't want the Taliban to overrun Afghanistan again -
in all this India has achieved some level of success.

Strategic gains as term I used for those forces which india have been financing and can be observed as supporting diplomatically , Its not a hidden fact that India want to encircle those forces through Afghanistan which they consider as threat to their national security .
That was the basic interest that enforced you to have your presence in Afghan territory.
I’m sure you understand the Isolated nature of Middle east excluding Gulf and North African region. Now Afghan itself are in isolated state , and many militant groups among which few are supporting government at present but their stance in future is unpredictable , I’m referring towards local Land lords those can change their loyalty according to scenario and their interests . No doubt, India is trying to reconstruct their infrastructure but Is that was the real cause of Indian presence. A plane statement about Afghan stability is not enough cuz NATO itself gives the same statement about regional stability and etc , and they are leaving afghan in 2014 means that they accept that their present doesn’t changed anything . Do you believe that the presence of few hundred Indian troops (At maximum) would help afghan to assist afghan security forces and could keep Taliban away from Kabul , You may have seen the reports of Afghan security men shooting their allies of NATO forces. Even NATO is struggling in assistance of Local security forces. Your own consulate security is not guaranteed their how can you speak about Afghan security, forget Afghan just Kabul’s security even cannot be guaranteed .
 
.
Not enough to fight the real threat. More Indian troops should be deployed for combat operations in Afghanistan.


Don't worry guys, India already have a strong contingent of 5000 personal in Afghanistan, safe guarding our business interest other than diplomatic missions. Inner circle of security cordon around Indian project teams is generally formed by Indian security teams from ITBP & Gurkhas.
 
.
Sad to see that you don't really want to help your "friends". It is a cruel world dear Afghans. Sigh.


Ohho.......so sad.....but our hands are full their. We are already helping our Baluch and TTP friends their and you know better than most of us bro. Sorry to Afghan brothers, we are bit busy at the moment.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom