What's new

India supporting "Terrorists" in Afghanistan against Pakistan

Doesn't come as a surprise but it's good the world knows the reality....once the Americans leave, it will be a rich hunting ground. :chilli:

That is why Afghanistani dont like you guys....:taz:
 
.
Yankee economy is broke and now they want to wind down most their military operations on forgein soil and so what better candidate than Hagel who so has long being adovacting withdrawing troops from overseas and say stuff that are music to Pakistani ears. India is no stangers to such clowns, most of officals in state department still the 90s were very anti India so this should n't come as shocker to Indian Diplomants.
If in future Yanks turn a blind eye to Pakistani terror against india it would n't come as surprise to me. Things would interesting for indians post 2014. The nightwalkers\Taliban would head for Kashmir post 2014. Hope IA is ready for some fun.
 
.
I don't think it"ll be necessary.

I'm most likely predicting a u turn by Chuck on his statement or US Govt stating that it Chuck Hagel's statement doesn't represent the US Govt's stance.

he holds one of the top positions in US and is blaming India for the mess it created in Afghanistan n pakistan
 
. .
Since he is American , he must be right. Yeah Pakistanis ? Now should we believe everything that Americans say about Pakistan as well ? Sure :D
 
. . .
India’s Future Role in Afghanistan Severely Limited

Afghan president Hamid Karzai reiterated the importance of India’s assistance for his country during his visit to New Delhi this month. He urged the country, and in particular its private sector, to further increase its investment in Afghanistan. The importance of Indian engagement in Afghanistan has been acknowledged by the Americans as well who are pushing India to step up its involvement in Afghanistan post 2014, especially in the security realm.

There is no doubt that India has played a major role in the reconstruction of Afghanistan since 2001. Having contributed close to $2 billion in aid over the past decade, India is the fifth largest donor nation to Afghanistan.

Although India has committed to increase its involvement in Afghanistan, there are some major limitations to its engagement that need to be highlighted.

For starters, there is no geographical contiguity between the two countries so India depends on others, notably Iran or Pakistan, for access. Both options are contentious.

Although there has been some easing of trade restrictions between India and Pakistan, the Pakistani military is still wary of Indian influence in Afghanistan and keen to prevent it from playing a larger role in what it sees as its traditional backyard.

Denying access to Indian goods that are meant for Afghanistan is one strategy for inhibiting Indian influence and there seems to be no inclination on the part of Pakistan to change this approach. This has prevented the maximization of the commercial relations between Afghanistan and India.

India, consequently, has relied on Iran to facilitate its trade. However, the port facilities at Chabahar in southeastern Iran still need to be developed and expanded, thereby requiring massive investment, to enable it to support trade on a large scale. More importantly, the use of such facilities will always be contingent on good relations with Iran which could be strained if India does not tread carefully when it comes to collaboration with the United States in the region, particularly in Afghanistan. Any developments in the region that India is a part of, including the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India gas pipeline or the “New Silk Road” initiative of the United States, that isolates or excludes Iran is likely to be resented by Tehran. This could ultimately prompt Iran to deny India access.

The main thrust of the Indian approach to Afghanistan has been the provision of socioeconomic and humanitarian assistance which has enabled it to earn significant political capital among both the Afghan political elite and the Afghan people. However, its positive engagement has been possible on account of the semblance of security created by the United States and their NATO allies. It would be difficult to maintain the same level of commitment when international security forces withdraw in 2014.

The future uncertainties have already begun to derail India’s commitments to Afghanistan. No new projects have been started for the last two years. Reports suggest that India is planning to scale down the allocation of both human and monetary resources to Afghanistan post 2014. Work on a number of existing projects has stalled due to the prevailing insecurity in Afghanistan. For instance, work on the Salma Dam project in the Herat Province, which was to be inaugurated two years ago, has been delayed on account of the prevailing insecurity in the area and constant attacks on the construction site by insurgent forces.

The problem is compounded by India’s inability to fill the security vacuum that will be created after 2014. For instance, India is not going to contribute directly toward enhancing security in the country as it will likely continue to resist sending in troops into Afghanistan.

This has been to avoid antagonizing the Pakistani military which in the past has resented even the deployment of a small noncombat contingent of troops to provide security to India’s own projects and workers. An Indian military presence in Afghanistan in the future would be counterproductive as it could make India’s presence in Afghanistan actually more vulnerable.

Similarly, it could serve to undermine the goodwill that India has earned over the past decade given the negative perception in the Afghan psyche associated with a foreign military presence. For all these reasons, there is unlikely to be consensus within India for sending troops.

India has limited itself to providing equipment and training to the Afghan National Security Forces. Although it has agreed to increase such activities, it will not train more than one thousand Afghan troops per year. This is too low a number since the envisioned strength of the Afghan army is about 350,000.

Policy makes in New Delhi will be keen to protect and expand upon the clout they have garnered in recent years through assistance and investments and use it as a springboard to further their interests and influence in Central Asia. But given the absence of an alternative security arrangement, tense relations with neighboring countries and the future uncertainties in both Afghanistan and the region, India’s ability to advance this agenda is severely limited.

http://atlanticsentinel.com/2012/11/indias-future-role-in-afghanistan-severely-limited/

India is already packing her bags, post 2014 and Pakistan will make sure India gets on her bike.
 
.
In all of this 'TIT FOR TAT' we shall see the blood of the innocent being sacrificed again. My solution? I am not an Indian, I am a Pakistani so I shall address my nation and her solution. Firstly, we should strengthen ourselves to withstand the clandestine assault of any nation, be it India or USA. If our civilians are happy, safe and loyal to us why would they be swayed by anyone? Secondly, pursue aggressive economic development and indigenous investment. Let us be a 'threat' but by a strong economy. Thirdly, actively pursue assimilation of our ethnic groups which would place ethnic economic disparity in the realm of civics rather than politics. Fourthly, vastly invest in our foreign relations to counter and turn the opinions against India if need be.

Do they seem to far-fetched? I do not think they are. We can achieve this within a decade. These tactics would counter our own insurgency and be a strategy against India.
 
.
Ahh The Irony ..... Now Every Indian will reject this statement , as since it is against them , it is most definitely Wrong .

How come you guys started believing USA:azn:
 
.
India is already packing her bags, post 2014 and Pakistan will make sure India gets on her bike. [/COLOR][/SIZE][/I]

Why do some Pakistanis have this deluded retarded percpetion of Afghanistan post 2014

Nobody in the region with the exception of Pakistan, support Talibani return in Afghanistan. Unlike 1991 neither Russia, India or CARs are in internal crisis.

Most likely it"ll be upto India to make sure Pakistan does not packing her bags and not get away on the bike, in FATA, Baluchistan and Kybher Paktunwala.
 
.
1971 was a response to Pakistani support for North East militant from East Pakistan, all over the 1960s, under Chinese blessing.

Then those North East support was in response to Indian occupation of Kashmir and hostile attitude of India towards since 1947.

2014, India mostly will have a different Govt. Most likely they too will do what is to be done :)

Yeah. Someone very controversial and tainted like Modi might be your PM. Holds opportunity for us.

its you who started from 1948 and then supported rebellion in indian north east in nagaland with chinese.
Learn history before making plans after 2014 :lol:

Already answered.
 
.
1500/43 = 34.88372093023256 persons per province.

Torture the statistics enough and they will confess to anything!

Survey from those afghans who live in city go and have survey in masses you will come to know whom Afghan people love.... Afghan people are land locked and there only hope is Pakistan..... we are culturally religiously and ethnically brothers and there is no relation with Indians...... So keep your A$$ away...

Dont live in fools paradise afghans have a second-class attitude towards Pakistan otherwise soviet jihad would have never happened!
 
.
I demand TIT for TAT from Pakistan side....!

India is sponsoring killings of innocents in Pakistan -- Pakistan should only keep it to indian military.

Even PA never accused Indian funded Northern alliance of killing innocent Pakistani civilans.
TTP etc which has attacked mostly PA is mostly pakistan based groups. So this story of India funded afghan terrorist seems very untrue.
India has time again given substantiate proof of Pak role in terror activties against India wonder why pakistan has not been able to do same if there is indeed indian hand in attacks on Pakistan.
 
.
Then those North East support was in response to Indian occupation of Kashmir
and hostile attitude of India towards since 1947.

For Kashmir East Pakistan ended up being the casualty.



Yeah. Someone very controversial and tainted like Modi might be your PM. Holds opportunity for us.

Possibility of Modi becoming PM is low, though BJP coming to power is high.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom