What's new

India Steps Toward Making Naturalization Harder for Muslims

What about Muslims like Aamir Khan and Shahrukh who have married Hindu women ?? Are they Love Jihadis and so must be thrown out ??

We can not throw anybody out in democracy but if they want to leave, we shall give happily give them farewell.
I am asking about suicides and you are talking about Ramrajya. And what does that mean anyway ??

I gave you the answer of the same. If you are unable to understand, what can I do? Ramrajya is a state is a highest state of welfare state where everything is based on justice and equality in my understanding.
 
.
Ramrajya is a state is a highest state of welfare state where everything is based on justice and equality in my understanding.

So Ramrajya is essentially a Socialist welfare state ??

1. Did Ramrajya ever exist ??

2. Do you oppose or support Modern Socialism ??
 
.
So Ramrajya is essentially a Socialist welfare state ??

1. Did Ramrajya ever exist ??

2. Do you oppose or support Modern Socialism ??

Yes, it has existed in past in the reign of Ram and many other Hindu Kings.
I do not have much idea of Modern Socialism but any ideology which is fair and aimed at making people happy and which works to strengthen the justice and welfare of people is good.
 
.
Yes, it has existed in past in the reign of Ram
and many other Hindu Kings.

So why does the Sangh movement ( one of whose groups is Sri Ram Sene ) hate Modern Socialism and its ideologues like Kanhaiya Kumar, Shehla Rashid and Umar Khalid ??

I do not have much idea of Modern Socialism but any ideology which is fair and aimed at making people happy and which works to strengthen the justice and welfare of people is good.

That is good intention.
 
.
So why is the Sangh movement ( one of whose groups is Sri Ram Sene ) hate Modern Socialism and its ideologues like Kanhaiya Kumar, Shehla Rashid and Umar Khalid ??

Ramsena is not a sangh's outfit. Correct yourself.

These are scums who shouts anti national slogans. Not only Ramsena but most of the people of country hate them.
 
. .
Ramsena is not a sangh's outfit. Correct yourself.

But it is part of the Sangh. Watch this vid from 2014 which speaks of Pramod Muthalik ( chief of Sri Rama Sene ) joining the BJP.

These are scums who shouts anti national slogans.

Here are some of those Leftwingers' slogans :

Poonjivaad se azadi ( Freedom from Capitalism )
Saamantvaad se azadi ( Freedom from Feudalism )
Bhramanvaad se azadi ( Freedom from Bhraminical tyranny )
How are these slogans anti-national ?? If anything, every Indian should be chanting them.

Not only Ramsena but most of the people of country hate them.

Many a time, true revolutionaries may be in minority. Many a time, the masses could be wrong.

Very much.:lol:

His ultimate intention may be good but his means should be different.

At least I hope that is what it is.
 
.
His ultimate intention may be good but his means should be different.
At least I hope that is what it is.

No harm in hoping for the best; though I have very different views about these elite Hindus. Better brace yourself, for the "Ramrajiya", which is coming your way.
 
.
But it is part of the Sangh. Watch this vid from 2014 which speaks of Pramod Muthalik ( chief of Sri Rama Sene ) joining the BJP.

If you join BJP tomorrow, do you become Sangh Member?

Here are some of those Leftwingers' slogans :

Poonjivaad se azadi ( Freedom from Capitalism )
Saamantvaad se azadi ( Freedom from Feudalism )
Bhramanvaad se azadi ( Freedom from Bhraminical tyranny )
How are these slogans anti-national ?? If anything, every Indian should be chanting them.

But Bharat tere tukade hoge Insh allah Insha allah is certainly anti national. Isn't it you liar and spokes person of anti national?

Many a time, true revolutionaries may be in minority. Many a time, the masses could be wrong.

So as extreme anti nationals. Anti nationals are not revolutionary. One needs to be extremely dumb or anti national to not understand the difference between anti national and revolutionaries.
 
.
If you join BJP tomorrow, do you become Sangh Member?

Of course I will become one. Isn't the BJP part of the Sangh ?? And it is so simple to understand that Sri Ram Sene is also part of the Sangh.

But Bharat tere tukade hoge Insh allah Insha allah is certainly anti national. Isn't it you liar and spokes person of anti national?

Kanhaiya Kumar and his comrades did not say that. Whoever said that, it is being taken great advantage by the Sangh to create a bad opinion in the minds of citizens about the JNU Leftists.

But regardless, what is your objection to the "azadi" slogans that I posted ??

So as extreme anti nationals. Anti nationals are not revolutionary. One needs to be extremely dumb or anti national to not understand the difference between anti national and revolutionaries.

So who is a revolutionary and who an anti-national in your opinion ??
 
.
That Kanhaiya Kumar, Anirban and Umar Khalid have been raising slogans like tukade honge and Azadi for Kashmir..
Why the hell we are bothered about our own country? and why the hell Muslim are apprehensive about CAB? It has nothing to do with them..
 
.
Of course I will become one. Isn't the BJP part of the Sangh ?? And it is so simple to understand that Sri Ram Sene is also part of the Sangh.

BJP is a separate entity having close ideology to sangh. There are many guys in BJP who happened to be the strong critics of Sangh once upon a time.
Kanhaiya Kumar and his comrades did not say that. Whoever said that, it is being taken great advantage by the Sangh to create a bad opinion in the minds of citizens about the JNU Leftists.

But regardless, what is your objection to the "azadi" slogans that I posted ??

Case is already filed against them with loads of proofs. Don't you know that?
So who is a revolutionary and who an anti-national in your opinion ??
Who do not believe in concept on nation and whose loyalty is some where else is an anti national? Does that require a subjective definition or do you believe something else?
 
.
Case is already filed against them with loads of proofs. Don't you know that?

Please post the proofs.

Who do not believe in concept on nation and whose loyalty is some where else is an anti national? Does that require a subjective definition or do you believe something else?

Nations are just modern political constructs. The main intention of a person should be loyalty to the idea of humanism. Isn't there the Sanskrit phrase "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" which means "The world is one family" ??

I post what Rabindranath Tagore had to say on Nationalism :
I am not against one nation in particular, but against the general idea of all nations. What is the Nation?
Nationalism is a great menace. It is the particular thing which for years has been at the bottom of India's troubles. And inasmuch as we have been ruled and dominated by a nation that is strictly political in its attitude, we have tried to develop within ourselves, despite our inheritance from the past, a belief in our eventual political destiny.
India has never had a real sense of nationalism. Even though from childhood I had been taught that the idolatry of Nation is almost better than reverence for God and humanity, I believe I have outgrown that teaching, and it is my conviction that my countrymen will gain truly their India by fighting against that education which teaches them that a country is greater than the ideals of humanity.
When our nationalists talk about ideals, they forget that the basis of nationalism is wanting. The very people who are upholding these ideals are themselves the most conservative in their social practice. Nationalists say, for example, look at Switzerland, where, in spite of race differences, the peoples have solidified into a nation. Yet, remember that in Switzerland the races can mingle, they can intermarry, because they are of the same blood. In India there is no common birthright. And when we talk of Western Nationality we forget that the nations there do not have that physical repulsion, one for the other, that we have between different castes. Have we an instance in the whole world where a people who are not allowed to mingle their blood shed their blood for one another except by coercion or for mercenary purposes? And can we ever hope that these moral barriers against our race amalgamation will not stand in the way of our political unity?
Then again we must give full recognition to this fact that our social restrictions are still tyrannical, so much so as to make men cowards. If a man tells me he has heterodox ideas, but that he cannot follow them because he would be socially ostracized, I excuse him for having to live a life of untruth, in order to live at all. The social habit of mind which impels us to make the life of our fellow-beings a burden to them where they differ from us even in such a thing as their choice of food is sure to persist in our political organization and result in creating engines of coercion to crush every rational difference which, is the sign of life. And tyranny will only add to the inevitable lies and hypocrisy in our political life. Is the mere name of freedom so valuable that we should be willing to sacrifice for its sake our moral freedom?

The idea of the Republic, the modern nation, was born only with the French Revolution and that too as means of abolishing monarchy and feudalism.
 
. .
Please post the proofs.

Search Google. i am not going to spoon feed you until you swear you will become a positive minded fellow and won't defend traitors.
Nations are just modern political constructs. The main intention of a person should be loyalty to the idea of humanism. Isn't there the Sanskrit phrase "Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam" which means "The world is one family" ??

I post what Rabindranath Tagore had to say on Nationalism :

I fully agree with you but world is not ideal. We have the ideologies which kills there neighbors and rape their women and cry for what is happening in Philistine. They keep mum on atrocities and oppression in china and carry out demonstration for Rohingyas. Ye dogale mentally sick radicals do not understand what is Vasudhaiv kutumbakam. Now we can not allow good guys to be victim of those animal and hence we have to stand strong as a nation (Which is the largest unit which we can address right now). Bloody, some guys have justification to do any wrong based on their holy books and they want India and Hindus to fly pigeon of peace so that they have the free hand to put their dirty design in action.

Let me enlighten you with best idea of this universe for an ideal society. When Bhishma was slipping on the bed of arrow awaiting to leave body, Lord Krishna asked Yudhishtir to go and ask if have any riddle of how should be an ideal society or political system. Yudhishthir asked Pitamah Bhishma how should an ideal society be?
Bhishma Replied:

न राज्यं न च राजासीत् , न दण्डो न च दाण्डिकः ।
स्वयमेव प्रजाः सर्वा , रक्षन्ति स्म परस्परम् ॥

Means:

There Should neither be a kingdom (Group of people having geographical boundary or culture or any force which binds them to gather separate from others) nor a king (Somebody to dictate and enforce which he believes is right or law), nor a punishment (Criminal code to punish some one) , nor a punishment agency (Judiciary) . All the people lives to gather by protecting each other.

This is an ideal and our culture. Now the other people say that whosoever do not believe us, It is their religious duty to kill them. Now these tow ideologies can exist to gather. It is duty of believers of first ideology to protect themselves from believers of second ideology to stop this world from being a hell. So ideal will work only when the whole world is ideal. Those human with animal instinct need to be dealt with like animals.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom