Dear Communist,
Unfortunately, perhaps, the utopia what you said may not turn out to be true. Nonetheless, I still failed to see why eventually making India Chinas friend wouldnt be in Chinas interest, wouldnt be in SA peoples interest.
The Chinese dont want to live (mix) with the Indians, and perhaps vise versa. If they can have a clear demarcation on land, and there is no aggression or threat to aggress another country that harm the regional peace and prosperity, there is no element tolerated in one country that is meant to threat the other country, I dont see why India and China relationship wont improve further. Regular wars are not good for either country, as war is an enemy to wealth. A decisive war might help, sometimes, but no occupation.
Did you invoke Chairman Maos struggle philosophy in your comments?
BTW, Id like to discuss with you about your understanding of communism, if you dont mind. What is laughable and clownish is that many brainwashed people who are never botherd to know know what communism is start to curse communism, in a naive and peevish way.
Yes buddy, you are right, Chinese do not want to mix with Indians. Hope Indians too do that. It is good for both of them. They must avoid creating a mess. But as India's foreign policy is aggressive in nature, China must have some precaution before making every diplomatic deal with India.
The Anglo-Saxons of America allowed Indians to mix with them, and they will regret one day. There are many reasons behind this. I do not need to tell them, you yourself will know them in your life time. President Obama's call for Buffalo is just the start.
Communism is dictatorship. Shocked, no?
Yes it is dictatorship, but
dictatorship of the proletariat. Who are the proletariat? The working class who provide the manual labor to the society and state, is the proletariat. And the laboring class is the majority while the bourgeoisie is the minority. Thus when we say dicatorship fo the proletariat, we say dictatorship of the majority. And when majority rules, it is actually democracy.
Bourgeoisie exploits the working class to make surplus profit out of which they create huge amount of wealth. But the wealth belongs to their private ownership. Only they can enjoy the wealth. It means the rest of the people or the majority, the proletariat class is deprived of their legal share. If the proletariat does not protest the deprivation, profit gearing and surplus making will go on. Thus distance between the poor and the rich will increase more and more ending up in mere slavery. And a capitalist class will take birth there.
Marx says, in such a situation, resistance to the Capitalist exploitation will inevitably come from below. Laboring people cannot lead themselves and then bourgeoisie or the middle class will lead them for its own interests. If the proletariat succeeds, it will be considered a revolution. Revolution is turning things upside down.
A Communist must not believe in nation state, caste/race, creed, sect and religion. Because we consider them as narrow self-destructive sentiments. Marx said, 'all the workers of the world unite'. He (himself a Jewish) did not say Jewish workers unite. He did not say Jewish workers of this particular nation state unite. We believe in internationalism. But we know still people are uneducated and ignorant and thus they cannot get this at this moment. It needs some time.
It is actually wealth or economy which is the key to the understanding of all problems of society.
).
Your knowledge of Communism is school boyish. Google it did you? 
