danger007
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 30, 2011
- Messages
- 10,007
- Reaction score
- -27
- Country
- Location
India should accept defeat before Kashmiris’ struggle, says Nawaz
- Thread starter Devil Soul
- Start date
Post your references, so that 'you have read somewhere' is not the base of your claims and allegations. It has been deliberately posted in seniors cafe as the kind of troll fest usually comes from posting it with nationalism charged ignorants. And even the Pakistani Seniors who you lament have left it unchallenged know the veracity of the facts as being laid out. The posts we have made have nothing to do with either indian or pakistani views, but the series of events as occurred.
Neither are you fit to ascertain the loyalties of Sheikh Abdullah, nor am I. So mere compilation of facts.
Get your facts straight on following points:
1. The formation of Dominions of India and Pakistan by the Indian Independence Act of 1947.
2. The anti-Dogra movement led by the All Jammu & Kashmir National Conference (later National Conference) which was Muslim centric at inception and was secularised later.
3. The divergence of view of the above said conference and its constituents over declaration of a separate country by Muslim League by adoption of the relevant motion.
4. The circumstances wherein Sheikh Abdullah, even though being in jail, was consulted by Maharaja as he was the recognised leader of the recognised mainstream party of National Conference.
5. The letter of proclaimed loyalty to the Maharaja and his lineage as written by Sheikh Abdullah as recorded.
6. The Instrument of Accession signed with concurrence of Sheikh Abdullah by Maharaja with the conditions which most Indian members jump about here.
7. The ceding of territories of Hunza without taking concurrence of people of J&K either on your side or even for the sake of it across the whole of J&K, entering into a temporary accommodation with China as that boundary settlement is only provisional.
8. Historical facts of the history of the principle constituents of J&K as brought under suzerainty of Sikh empire and by continuation and expansion to British Empire in India as also the legal validity of all claims and territories thereof as being inherited by both India and Pakistan (this includes the territories you should have no ceded in Shasgam Valley to China which were historically under Hunza and when you agreed to instrument of accession by Hunza by default you were duty bound and honour bound to uphold those claims; which you did not)
9. The salient points of the UN resolution and Karachi Agreement of 1948.
I can go on and on ... but you can always consult.
If we were posting tripe, we would have been banned or simply not had the pleasure of getting the views and information from members of your own country who have given us greater insight into putting in perspective a picture of Kashmir that, I admit, even I was not completely aware of.
Example is of WAJsal whose magnanimity in spreading knowledge to those desirous allowed me insights I did not have of Gilgit so far. His write up is so eloquent that I am taking my time as I shall need to read extensively to be able to counter (if at all) any point where I may get a chance.
DISCLAIMER: ANY AND ALL TYPOS AND SPELLING MISTAKES THAT MAY ARISE IN MY WRITE UP IS THE WHOLE AND THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLE INC. THEIR SPELL CHECK SUCKS BIG TIME!!!
Last edited:
Oi, I resent that. What do you mean a perfect Indian? The one who parrots non-sense like which we accuse our neighbours of? Then, yeah, am not perfect..... but for me J&K's solution lies in between Article 1.1 of Indian Constitution and Article 370. Maybe I will stand for elections someday and then ask your vote and then will give you the political solution!!!
But have laid out the bitter facts. Read Chinese Campaign - Dalvi and Palit, you will call them traitors for what they write!!!!! One commanded the ill fated brigade and the other was in Military Operations.
Why is that it is so hard for both Pakistanis and Indians to accept the historical facts and make sensible decisions based on them??
On a side note: The Naga mess was much greater than Kashmir. In Kashmir we have an Instrument of Accession. But in Naga, they declared independence. To add insult to their injury, Nehru in his finite wisdom and infinite stupidity, gave the traditional grazing land of Nagas till Chindwin to Burma as a boundary settlement. That set off the most potent Insurgencies that India had ever known. We got two accords and the present Indian dispensation did exactly what we have been saying and our fellow nationals baying for our bloods over it - reach an accord granting autonomy to Nagas without change in boundaries. Things have settled. Modi signed it quietly on 03 August (I think)
When you can do that for Nagaland, why not for a state where you promised it? Anyways, that is moot point as already the state has that autonomy and it is only the Kashmiris themselves who run and manage the state government who are messing up by rampant corruption and poor administration.
I feel like I am in a round room which has no doors and looking for an exit
When you half read and follow it up with absence of comprehension skills, we get retard post like this.
Counter-Narrative for your above point ..
1. Where does it say that India has to hold a plebiscite as a binding resolution?
2. Where is the date given for a plebiscite?
3. Who gave the criteria of plebiscite as mandatory for acceptance of Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja of J&K?
4. If indeed plebiscite was the criteria, when was plebiscite held when you accepted the accession of Gilgit? It was not, merely the Gilgit Scouts mutinied and asked for accession .... at the point of a gun. Where was the plebiscite held when you signed the Sino-Pakistan Boundary Pact and ceded territories of Hunza State in Shasgam?
Another Professor of History, telling his-version of story!!!
Another dimwit. Unfortunately we have a few on our sides too. I enjoyed it till about 02 days back. And now @Dash et al have decided am not 'perfect' indian ... lol what is that?
Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Do you have difficulty in reading or comprehending English? May I have the pleasure of reproducing the Resolution and of rubbing your face in it? A 'yes' or a 'no' will suffice.
Stephen Cohen
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2014
- Messages
- 8,456
- Reaction score
- -37
- Country
- Location
I feel like I am in a round room which has no doors and looking for an exit
The insurgency in North East DIED because of the Bangladesh factor
The North East states have realised over a period of time that only Indian Government and Indian Army can help them in the long run
from the un ending stream of Bangladeshis
Hence North east cooled down -- it is a case of SELF preservation
Some pockets of violence remain but slowly they are coming to their senses
Look at Assam -- voting for BJP
Kashmir is the opposite they believe that with Pakistan's HELP they will be able to break free
from India
Kashmir violence is Jihad against India
That is why Manipur cooled down being a border state
And perhaps you may be knowing about Manipur Nagaland conflict
Where both come running to Delhi for Help
The number of Forces we have deployed in North east for Internal security
is just ONE FOURTH that of Kashmir --excluding that on China border
So says a Bangladeshi. Seriously, do you guys come here to prove the Pakistanis right when they say 'good riddance' to loss of Bangladesh?
Your these kinds of post do tend to push me to believe that .. and tends to make me be sympathetic to their POV about you as a nation.
Read history
East India Company
Vasco Da Gama
Any bells so far? they came looking for India
not for Sikkim, Assam .... lol and Bangladesh was old Assam!!!
Last edited:
Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
Oi, I resent that. What do you mean a perfect Indian? The one who parrots non-sense like which we accuse our neighbours of? Then, yeah, am not perfect..... but for me J&K's solution lies in between Article 1.1 of Indian Constitution and Article 370. Maybe I will stand for elections someday and then ask your vote and then will give you the political solution!!!
But have laid out the bitter facts. Read Chinese Campaign - Dalvi and Palit, you will call them traitors for what they write!!!!! One commanded the ill fated brigade and the other was in Military Operations.
Why is that it is so hard for both Pakistanis and Indians to accept the historical facts and make sensible decisions based on them??
On a side note: The Naga mess was much greater than Kashmir. In Kashmir we have an Instrument of Accession. But in Naga, they declared independence. To add insult to their injury, Nehru in his finite wisdom and infinite stupidity, gave the traditional grazing land of Nagas till Chindwin to Burma as a boundary settlement. That set off the most potent Insurgencies that India had ever known. We got two accords and the present Indian dispensation did exactly what we have been saying and our fellow nationals baying for our bloods over it - reach an accord granting autonomy to Nagas without change in boundaries. Things have settled. Modi signed it quietly on 03 August (I think)
When you can do that for Nagaland, why not for a state where you promised it? Anyways, that is moot point as already the state has that autonomy and it is only the Kashmiris themselves who run and manage the state government who are messing up by rampant corruption and poor administration.
I feel like I am in a round room which has no doors and looking for an exit
When you half read and follow it up with absence of comprehension skills, we get retard post like this.
Counter-Narrative for your above point ..
1. Where does it say that India has to hold a plebiscite as a binding resolution?
2. Where is the date given for a plebiscite?
3. Who gave the criteria of plebiscite as mandatory for acceptance of Instrument of Accession signed by Maharaja of J&K?
4. If indeed plebiscite was the criteria, when was plebiscite held when you accepted the accession of Gilgit? It was not, merely the Gilgit Scouts mutinied and asked for accession .... at the point of a gun. Where was the plebiscite held when you signed the Sino-Pakistan Boundary Pact and ceded territories of Hunza State in Shasgam?
Another Professor of History, telling his-version of story!!!
Another dimwit. Unfortunately we have a few on our sides too. I enjoyed it till about 02 days back. And now @Dash et al have decided am not 'perfect' indian ... lol what is that?
You have now been paid the highest compliment of all. The Iago of the board has recognised you.
Brickwall
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,019
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
Seeing as they are gladly ceding their suzerainty to China .. you may have an answer.
Am honoured .. but I need to read a hell of a lot to start engaging you, so not yet at par with you ....
Joe Shearer
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 27,493
- Reaction score
- 162
- Country
- Location
LOL.
WAJsal is only in his teens. Mark my words, we will hear more of him in future.
Am honoured .. but I need to read a hell of a lot to start engaging you, so not yet at par with you ....
Dear Sir, You have already gone past me. Ask the seniors. With sincere regards, 'Joe'.
Sure Bangladeshis know freedom struggle. Bangladeshis and in this case all Muslims should stand against indian genocide in Kashmir.
Brickwall
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,019
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
You should really read your history particularly your forefathers rebellion against Pakistan ,your so called Muslim saviors.
Kudos to him. A student of Political Science I guess? But damn good then.
Sir, learning still ... long way yet I assure you. But thanks to all the members here across nationalities who allow us to have insights which we are bereft of, and experience of all here, it is one phase of my life wherein I am learning faster than I can absorb. Thanks for your efforts in the same, personally and pointing me to people who have given me a different perspective.
Don't bother, he answered my question in 168# LOL
Similar threads
