What's new

India second to none in battlefield technology research

We as Indian's are a bit slow but not at all incapable of development...sure deu to some old policies of socialism we could not achive what we could have achieved vis e versa owr northen naighbour but we are getting there??????

some member's find it very pleaseing in singing praises for there Friend's(which change time to time) and making fun of owr effort's...sucsess & faliure are the side's of the same coin ..as eddison once quoted aftr repeted faliuer's that it is not faliure but a lesson to how should i do things more anthousiastically & learn what not to do????

yes we have corrupy beurocracy & politician's & some stupid law's but still we are able to achieve a lot & god willing we will get more good new's cause we dont just sit back after some faliure's but learn from it & move on.......Thanks.
 
.
well copying the external strucring doesn't mean we are cloning...the insas might look similar to AKM but AKM uses 7.62 rounds whereas insas primarily uses 5.56(although 7.62 round has come up afew years ago),the lca and arjun might look similar to certain others but the components are different(we wouldn't have bought 126 rafales then,we buy 26,clone the rest;lol)and your last statement was ridiculous,india is the largest producer and exporter of garments in the world,indian companies don't need advertisement!!!!

love this logic when chines develop j11 and says (admit and never give silly arguments) only frame is copied. indian comes with new logic new concept of copying why these things doesn't apply on indian.
we develop (funding "ab khush") for jf-17 we says it is based on f-16, introduced LERX and says like in f-18, and DSI we says we copy the concept from f-35 but didnt come with second to none logic and article like we were blinds or never saw or heard about f-35 its totally our own indigenous research.

PS: again no one hates you development but when you guyz comes with logics like junk, copied cheap for pakistanis and chinese then we have all the right to reply as tit for tat ;) eye for eye, troll for troll :s watever

btw off topic sorry forget to congrat for one real indian achievement

Tendulkar 100 100th

congradulation to tendulkar and to all indians ( see thats called "second to none" )
 
.
lol the research is so advanced that still indians import every thing

Certainly Bro. Not only Imported but also copied like china, do theft with scientist of nuke tech, import parts of missiles from north koria, and so own. What so ever indian Arjun 2, pinaka, Brahmos, prahar, lad, agni, shaurya, insas, aesa radar,lch, alh, all are absolute imported no indian tech in it.

And we poor indians even cant copy Miraj 2000 to make lca; where as chinus r so better to copy j 10 and su27 cpy.........and so on.

Come on men even though nuke tech theft by nuke father but enough to kill lakhs people
 
.
Certainly Bro. Not only Imported but also copied like china, do theft with scientist of nuke tech, import parts of missiles from north koria, and so own. What so ever indian Arjun 2, pinaka, Brahmos, prahar, lad, agni, shaurya, insas, aesa radar,lch, alh, all are absolute imported no indian tech in it.

And we poor indians even cant copy Miraj 2000 to make lca; where as chinus r so better to copy j 10 and su27 cpy.........and so on.

Come on men even though nuke tech theft by nuke father but enough to kill lakhs people

mate what are you prattling on about. For national security nothing matter steal borrow copy who the F cares.
 
.
love this logic when chines develop j11 and says (admit and never give silly arguments) only frame is copied. indian comes with new logic new concept of copying why these things doesn't apply on indian.
we develop (funding "ab khush") for jf-17 we says it is based on f-16, introduced LERX and says like in f-18, and DSI we says we copy the concept from f-35 but didnt come with second to none logic and article like we were blinds or never saw or heard about f-35 its totally our own indigenous research.

PS: again no one hates you development but when you guyz comes with logics like junk, copied cheap for pakistanis and chinese then we have all the right to reply as tit for tat ;) eye for eye, troll for troll :s watever

btw off topic sorry forget to congrat for one real indian achievement

Tendulkar 100 100th

congradulation to tendulkar and to all indians ( see thats called "second to none" )

Do u want to say he is like Imran Khan Second to none.
 
. .
INSAS field strip

DSC05566.jpg

DSC05571-1.jpg
DSC05570.jpg


AKM feild strip

tumblr_lzexeiyhsr1rpwy9to1_1280.jpg


Final Product.

DSC05573.jpg

Post+INSAS+UBGL2.jpg

Ak47bayonet.gif

ak103.jpg


Different variants available as per user requirements.
 
.
Do u want to say he is like Imran Khan Second to none.

as a captain imran is second to none atleast for pakistanis, not sachin. Sachin is class batsman, just like you cant compare sachin with waseem? no both are class in there own departments.

btw sorry mod no more off topic, although whole thread is off topic :D
 
.
Certainly Bro. Not only Imported but also copied like china, do theft with scientist of nuke tech, import parts of missiles from north koria, and so own. What so ever indian Arjun 2, pinaka, Brahmos, prahar, lad, agni, shaurya, insas, aesa radar,lch, alh, all are absolute imported no indian tech in it.

And we poor indians even cant copy Miraj 2000 to make lca; where as chinus r so better to copy j 10 and su27 cpy.........and so on.

Come on men even though nuke tech theft by nuke father but enough to kill lakhs people
what is your contribution in lca,mki,brahmos,pakfa?
 
.
second to none - Idioms - by the Free Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.

better than everything else. This is an excellent car—second to none. Her suggestion was second to none, and the manager accepted it eagerly.

Second to none | Define Second to none at Dictionary.com

The best, as in Mom's chocolate cake is second to none

I don't know what kind of English text books Indian schools are teaching, but it sure as heck ain't from the real English speaking world. :lol:
 
.
as a captain imran is second to none atleast for pakistanis, not sachin. Sachin is class batsman, just like you cant compare sachin with waseem? no both are class in there own departments.

btw sorry mod no more off topic, although whole thread is off topic :D

I was talking about PDF Member........
 
. .
what is your contribution in lca,mki,brahmos,pakfa?

lca is completely indian designed. the first prototype thats was flown had mostly foreign avionics. but after 2001 to to 2010 we have mastered 33/35 major avionics in tejas on our own and replaced all foreign parts. goo look it up. mmr was built in cooperation with isreal. aesa radar will be ready by nxt year. and yes the engine, thats where i think we kindaa messed up.

about mki i dont think we have any role its completely russian and whats chinas contribution in their mki:what:

brahmos is built designed and developed by an indian company headed by an indian. if russia is involved and russia is world leader in missiles doesnt mean they did all the work. living a delusional life and finding excuses is not a great idea.

pakfa as of now we r currently busy building 50% avionics for the plane.
 
. .
Ya right . I believe them . What BS

I don't think any sane Indian is going to take these words seriously .
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom