What's new

India’s political paralysis

VCheng

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
48,460
Reaction score
57
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
from: India

India’s political paralysis
Gasping for breath
Short of authority and direction, India’s rulers flail in the face of growing problems
Dec 17th 2011 | DELHI | from the print edition


A lesser man might have quit by now. Even Manmohan Singh’s fabled ability to endure humiliation is being tested. That the prime minister defers to his political boss and head of the ruling Congress party, Sonia Gandhi, is widely accepted. That he is undercut by colleagues, including Mrs Gandhi, who are still sceptical about his liberalising reforms, looks increasingly hard for him to swallow. Tougher yet for a man of personal integrity is that he is presiding over such widespread and outrageous corruption. Nor can it be easy for him to accept that, despite an emphatic re-election in 2009, his government has passed no substantial laws.

The price is being paid by India itself. Investors and others lament policy paralysis. Ministers shy away from big decisions, fearing accusations of graft—though Mr Singh this week urged them at least to get on with infrastructure spending. Meanwhile an obstructive opposition, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has caused gridlock in parliament for much of the year, hoping to tap public fury over corruption.

As a result, the current parliament has done the least work of any in a quarter of a century. A prominent Congress figure, Shashi Tharoor, is so glum he suggested this week scrapping parliament altogether in favour of a presidential system. That will not happen, but nor will much get done. On December 13th the finance minister, Pranab Mukherjee, had almost to beg MPs to collaborate on economic reform.

Well he might. An overdue, but poorly sold, official decision to let foreigners invest in (and so improve) the retail sector in India was put on hold just two weeks after it was announced. Mr Mukherjee admitted that the government would have fallen if the matter had gone to a vote. Promoting a reform expressly to reassure investors, then promptly backing away, was dismally bad politics. It may mark the moment this government lost its way.

The weakness looks unforgivable given that Congress holds 207 of the 545 seats in the lower house, or Lok Sabha. On the surface, the blunder was failing to square the retail deal with a coalition ally, the Trinamul Congress, led by Mamata Banerjee, a notoriously unreliable ally. She sabotaged Mr Singh’s trip to Bangladesh in September over a river-sharing deal; in November she threatened to topple the government over a small petrol-price rise.

But in opposing retail reform she was emboldened by others. Congress leaders opposed the policy in cabinet, which suggests a deeper problem of factions inside the prime minister’s party. Mrs Gandhi’s dismal silence spoke of her broader detachment, after being diagnosed with a serious illness in the summer. Her son, Rahul Gandhi, a timid would-be prime minister, was as ever absent, pottering around in the politics of Uttar Pradesh. Mr Singh and his coterie were feebly exposed.

Such failures are inviting opponents of other policies to prowl. A plan to let the private sector provide more pensions may be the next victim. A long-touted proposal to confer a “right” to food will be delayed. And on December 13th parliament’s finance committee attacked the government’s prized scheme for rolling out biometric identity cards, warning it had “no clarity of purpose” and could be a security risk. That looks like an opening salvo for bigger attacks on the scheme next year.

These problems are compounded by slackening economic growth. Local and foreign investors are already unnerved by a global slowdown. Political intransigence, continuing corruption, high inflation and the possibility that India will miss its fiscal targets all add to the government’s woes.

Mr Mukherjee has cut his growth forecast for the year, from 9% to 7.5%. Even that may be optimistic, after figures on December 12th showed industrial output (spread across mining, capital goods and other sectors) slumped by 5.1% in October compared with a year earlier. The rupee promptly reached historic lows against the dollar. Inflation fell slightly, to 9.1% in November, but is still much too high. So the central bank will not rush to reverse its long run of rate rises that have left investors squealing.

The response from Mr Singh should be a push to explain to Congress and the country how reforms to land ownership or government efficiency or the retail sector would help to improve the mood and hence India’s economic fortunes. Instead he looks set to be embroiled, for the third time this year, in another bitter struggle. A populist anti-graft campaigner, Anna Hazare, is back on the national stage with demands for an ombudsman, a “lokpal”, to oversee politicians, including the prime minister. Mr Hazare is increasingly political and explicitly anti-Congress—he sat with leaders from the opposition BJP and the Communist Party at a one-day fast in Delhi on December 11th and has told voters to boycott the ruling party. That move might limit the numbers who actually rally round him, but it still looks likely to pile more pressure on the ageing Mr Singh.

from the print edition | Asia
 
the time for this news has past.

Situations change on a daily basis.
 
This is all due to the anna hazare campaign. The politicians and bureaucrats are all siting on files and not approving anything just because they fear that they will be targeted for corruption charges.

A sign of weak govt/leadership indeed.
 
the time for this news has past.

Situations change on a daily basis.

Yes, with those changes, look at the effect on the economic forecast already, with possibly more to materialize.

This is all due to the anna hazare campaign. The politicians and bureaucrats are all siting on files and not approving anything just because they fear that they will be targeted for corruption charges.

A sign of weak govt/leadership indeed.

Well, may be some good can come out of this campaign by reducing corruption, at least somewhat.
 
If this is what a political crisis is then, India has been in a political crisis from a long time. Since the last two decades we've not seen a single party emerge single-handedly in power. When a man no less than Pranab Mukherjee stands in parliament and says - have I perfected the art of coalition politics, my honest submission is No. :)

India can't usher in the economic reforms at the pace the world wishes to see. All west wants to see is a way to sell stuff to Indian middle class. The west hates it when our govt goes for socialist moves like employment and food security for all. According to them it increases our fiscal deficit and dries up resources for big ticket infrastructure projects but India is not equal to middle class. MIddle class is like 300 million odd, what about the rest of 800 million. India will grow at its own pace and in its own style.

India will be a mixed economy unlike the west. There are multiple strains even in a pro-reform party like BJP for swadeshi ( indigenous ) vs foreign, more govt vs less govt.

The retail part that was put on hold recently made news but nobody realizes that single brand retail has passed, its the multi brand retail that is on hold.

Its the delicate art of balancing that the world says is crisis. India is a self obsessed democracy which is going to a rich country with a lot of poor people. We can't replicate the west's model as it is.
 
from: India

Nor can it be easy for him to accept that, despite an emphatic re-election in 2009, his government has passed no substantial laws.

[

This is exactly why Congress rule has been such a disappointment. With the kind of political power they had achieved in 2009, they could have done so much more. Instead, they got embroiled into one of the biggest scams of all time, and then got into a fistfight with Anna Hazare. The opposition is sensing an opportunity and adding to the ruckus.

Anyway, it does not matter which party is in power. Policy matters are too important to be left in the hands of 10th pass politicians. What is important is political stability.
 
............
Anyway, it does not matter which party is in power. Policy matters are too important to be left in the hands of 10th pass politicians. What is important is political stability.

Absolutely, emphatically 100% correct. :tup:
 
Yes, with those changes, look at the effect on the economic forecast already, with possibly more to materialize.



Well, may be some good can come out of this campaign by reducing corruption, at least somewhat.

Just looking at corruption from different prespective.

Losing on front of governance to curb corruption,i don't thing that is a good trade.

People when accuse politicians of being corrupt and bash them for that overlooks an important aspect of corruption.It's utility in the election process of large democracies.

Fighting elections costs money.It require close to 5-15Crore INR to fight for each seat in lok sabha.Someone who is fighting that election either has to finance this amount from his own pocket or from donations from wealthy industrialists.

Now imagine for a moment that corruption is completely rooted out that what would be it's consequence for democracy

Would a poor/middle class person would ever be able to fight elections?

Won't politics become a preserve of rich?

Election financing also performs another function.It provides industrialists and capitalists stake in government.They are actually the breadwinners for any nation to say the least.

In a democracy,minorities rights should be protected.

A Capitalist is clearly in numeric minority.The only way a capitalist could have a say in electoral process is by using money power.Depriving him/her of that power would not be good for a healthy democracy.And the only people who would be able to fight elections are either super rich or super diabolic(Cast/Communal) leader.

A good example for my above point and also a point relating to Anna's anshan would be the electoral system of california.Here people have right to recall and to bring legislation on their own.Result:California is bankrupt.People used this right to lower down taxes to unsustainable level and fired representatives who did not toed their line.It is just one example of democracy turning into Majority authoritarianism.As Madison has stated during constitution writing that People in Democracy should only be spectators rather than active participants.

A better way to look at this would be to compare India with fellow Democracies of same size(Not singapore and switzerland).

Is their corruption in US Electoral process?

The answer would be NO,But that is because US has legalised corruption in the name of lobbying.What happens in India in the name of corruption is done in US in the name of lobbying.The fact that elections cost money is a universal truth.A better approach for India to deal with corruption is to legalise lobbying.That way the voice of minority and special interest groups would be heeded to.

Bad policies lead to corruption not bad people.Only Changing of policies would make a difference.
 
Even without this anti corruption movement, UPA -II had no focus, no specific agenda for economic progress.
We all expected miracles from MMS, but it seems he has failed to deliver on things he is supposed to be good at.
 
The price is being paid by India itself. Investors and others lament policy paralysis. Ministers shy away from big decisions, fearing accusations of graft

Re: Japan announces $4.5 bn loan to India for infrastructure corridor
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom