INDIA 's Nuclear military capability-A FULL Analysis..

[locker]

So it is atleast 2.5 MT. Am i right. At least 1 MT. But how reliable is it without test?

As we say
'A gesture is enough for a wise'
It is reliable enough to give our scientists confidence to go for even more yield.
So that speaks about the reliability of the bomb without tests, isn't it?

Unfortunately my sister did not opt for P. Hd. in institute of Plazma research else I woud have a great information in this field.

So that means your sister isn't doing Phd???

 

[vsdave2302]

We are building nukes and other weapons to counter US hegemony. if there is an arms race, which there isn't, it is not with India.

Just 2 post ago you said that you need 5000 N bomb to counter india and now you say that there is no race with India. You are a typical chines who do not know what he writes.

As we say
'A gesture is enough for a wise'
It is reliable enough to give our scientists confidence to go for even more yield.
So that speaks about the reliability of the bomb without tests, isn't it?

So that means your sister isn't doing Phd???

She did in education from Sydney university. She had given one interview in institute of Plazma research. She told me that that interview was the toughest she ever faced. it lasted for 3 hours.

 

[SURYA-1]

So it is atleast 2.5 MT. Am i right. At least 1 MT. But how reliable is it without test?

Unfortunately my sister did not opt for P. Hd. in institute of Plazma research else I woud have a great information in this field.




Presently not. Thermo nuclear is a 2 stage device in which a primary device (A fusion bomb ) is ignited to give tremendous energy required to start fusion (Secondary device). Primary device is a fission and it has the radiation. Secondary device is a fusion and do not emit any radiation. So in all and all a Hydrogen bomb emit around 10% of radiation (From primary devise.) of comparative yield fission bomb.

Can we take out Pakistan's all delivery vectors with single or multiple EMP blasts ?? I guess nuclear detonation at some altitude makes it possible. Is that so ??

 

[vsdave2302]

@locker

Thanks and let us wish that we have credible nuke deterrance and next stage should be MIRV. Iread that MIRV was ready and a permission to test was soughted on A5 but MM refused to give permission.

An electronic dispenser should do the job. It shall decapicitate all Pakistani command and control system

 

[locker]

@locker

Thanks and let us wish that we have credible nuke deterrance and next stage should be MIRV. Iread that MIRV was ready and a permission to test was soughted on A5 but MM refused to give permission.

An electronic dispenser should do the job. It shall decapicitate all Pakistani command and control system

Yes,
But watch out for A6.

 

[vsdave2302]

Yes,
But watch out for A6.

When will it be launced ? They says that it will be in 2017 so we expct arround 2019?

 

[Jlaw]

Just 2 post ago you said that you need 5000 N bomb to counter india and now you say that there is no race with India. You are a typical chines who do not know what he writes.



.

And you are a typical Indian who do not understand your official language. Read again.

 

[locker]

When will it be launced ? They says that it will be in 2017 so we expct arround 2019?

Ending of 2017.

 

[vsdave2302]

It is said that A6 shall be a 2.2 m Dia missile and may have round top . Do you have any Idea? All composite A5 is in making. That shall make A5 a much potent missile. More range and more speed. Any Idea?

And you are a typical Indian who do not understand your official language. Read again.

Again an ignorance typical to chinese only.

Ending of 2017.

3 Ton Payload and What is the range? The declared range shall be 6000 Km but it shall be a 10k KM range missile right?

 

[locker]

It is said that A6 shall be a 2.2 m Dia missile and may have round top . Do you have any Idea? All composite A5 is in making. That shall make A5 a much potent missile. More range and more speed. Any Idea?

It will be the sleekest and as A5 Is being remodelled to make it sleekest and more potent unlike previous bulky versions A5.
A6 will be on same technology but will feature MIRVes.
As A5 are 5000km+ ,A6 will be 6000km+.
But the first time in Indian context the technology used in new sleeker versions of A5 and A6 are on par with best of ICBMs currently available in the world.

 

[vsdave2302]

It will be the sleekest and as A5 Is being remodelled to make it sleekest and more potent unlike previous bulky versions A5.
A6 will be on same technology but will feature MIRVes.
As A5 are 5000km+ ,A6 will be 6000km+.
But the first time in Indian context the technology used in new sleeker versions of A5 and A6 are on par with best of ICBMs currently available in the world.

Seeker on Surface to surface missile? Are you talking of terminal guidance?

How can it be sleeker? That shall substentially increase the heoght of missile. It shall be fatter may be with all composite. Avinash chander said that warheads released from missile may futher travel to 1000 KM. So effectively the range shall be 7000 KM + atleast.

 

[PARIKRAMA]

Seeker on Surface to surface missile? Are you talking of terminal guidance?

How can it be sleeker? That shall substentially increase the heoght of missile. It shall be fatter may be with all composite. Avinash chander said that warheads released from missile may futher travel to 1000 KM. So effectively the range shall be 7000 KM + atleast.

Perhaps what i understand is the present Agni 5 being a direct derivative of Agni 3 is a bulky in size..Lemme show the illustration

Whereas Agni4 beinga derivative of Agni 2 is sleeker and less bulky as lots of weight ahs been actually stripped off as part of "sleek" missile. Agni 2 weighs around 18 tonnes whereas Agni 4 around 17 tonnes. Yet the range vs payload wise the increase in distance of coverage has helped Agni 4.

Agni 5 by contrast is a behemoth at 50 tonnes. Thus this missile becomes completely suitable only from land usage .. meaning either silos or via specialised trains. A comparision versus other missile shows a similar weight missile ranges warhead and weight.

I firmly believe Agni 6 may be taking over the Agni 4 design features. Perhaps using Agni 5 to change the mass and enabling it to fit into a submarine thereby completely achieveing the triad's lethality. Of course with MIRVs.

While researching i did find something. i am pasting it here
"In May 2008 Indian scientists of DRDO had announced that they have crafted and roped a path-breaking technology that increases the range of Indian missiles and satellite launch vehicles by minimum 40 per cent. The improved range is made possible by putting a special-purpose coating of chromium-based material to a rocket's blunt nose cone.

The chromium-based material acts as a reactive-ablative coating that forms a thin low density gaseous layer at the tip of the rocket as it touches the hypersonic level; this super-heated gas layer reduces drag by 47 percent, thereby allowing range enhancements at least 40 percentage point It has been confirmed that this technology will be incorporated in the upcoming Agni deployments after having undergone ranging and calibration tests."


Interestingly why not utilise this tech to other missiles also needs to be seen. I am sure this can enhance most of missile ranges by a good max 40%. The only question how many missiles of india achieves say hypersonic speed at terminal ranges or during flight? any details would be appreciated.

 

[Mustang06]

Why is it that Topol and DF-41 with roughly same physical specification have a greater range than Agni 6?

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Great info @locker . Thanks

 

[ravindra1455]

India has mastered the boosted fission technology. This is a technology in which the yield of Bomb can be boosted by 3 to 4 time by putting Tritium like element i the core. India has gathered huge stock pile of Tritium good to produce H bombs in Thousand of Numbers by a very special crystallization technique which no other country in the world has.

how you got that information