India’s K-15 SLBM: Where Does It Stand? – Analysis

[IND151]

is k-15 a SLBM version of shaurya missile ?

Reverse is true

K 15 has range of 700 KM while Shaurya has range of 600 KM.

 

[Genesis]

why is every Indian article has Indian weapons aiming at China.

When was the last time China said, this is for India.

If you must aim somewhere aim at the moon

 

[gslv mk3]

K 15 / Shaurya range is 700 km for a 1000 kg warhead.

The 200kT TN warhead that can be used on the Shaurya weighs only around 400 kgs.

 

[jaiind]

why is every Indian article has Indian weapons aiming at China.

When was the last time China said, this is for India.

If you must aim somewhere aim at the moon

recently some morons bullying India at her borders...

 

[Echo_419]

why is every Indian article has Indian weapons aiming at China.

When was the last time China said, this is for India.

If you must aim somewhere aim at the moon

Much of the media is sensationalizing the thing
Making it China or CCP Killer in reality it is just a deterrence weapon & we have a No First Use Policy
The GOI' stand is clear but the media to sell news is Sensationalizing the thing

A little Advise by me
Don't Belive what Russia Today says about EU & Israel
Don't Watch Fox news
& Don't trust Indian media on china related affairs

 

[Bratva]

India should be wise not to retaliate and pakistan keep using nukes? Besides what makes u think that we will only give u limited strike? U know what i mean?

Your war planners are much smarter than you are. That's why they would not use all out nuke war option, Until nukes used on an indian land.

 

[illuminatidinesh]

Your war planners are much smarter than you are. That's why they would not use all out nuke war option, Until nukes used on an indian land.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...here-does-stand-analysis-2.html#ixzz2fn84ftu7

My war planners never said anything about not using nukes, they are smarter because we are worried about only the world opinion.( of course for u there is nothing called world opinion) Not about where u use them, any nukes against Indians is going to give us the excuse to retaliate strongly irrespective of your so called delusion.
U still think we would wait till u take any action, first thought for us would wipe out any possible known nuke sites.

 

[dray]

Would India risk going nuclear when even Nukes are used in Pakistani territory? Instead of annihilating whole Bharat Mataa, India would be wise not to respond back until and unless nukes are used in an INDIAN TERRITORY.

"Were I to invoke logic, however, logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"

Your war planners are much smarter than you are. That's why they would not use all out nuke war option, Until nukes used on an indian land.

Don't try to push the limits based on your dubious assumptions; we only have a No First Use policy, and that's it! We are very clear on that, learn to accept that as final for your own good. Such assumptions always backfired for you, aren't they?

 

[illuminatidinesh]

Don't try to push the limits based on your dubious assumptions; we only have a No First Use policy, and that's it! We are very clear on that, learn to accept that as final for your own good. Such assumptions always backfired for you, aren't they?

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...here-does-stand-analysis-2.html#ixzz2fo1Ype4L

He thinks that by using Tactical nukes he can get away..... I dont know they still believe that someone will come to stop us like US in Kargil. Pity by that time who knows where would be Pakistan?

 

[Bratva]

Don't try to push the limits based on your dubious assumptions; we only have a No First Use policy, and that's it! We are very clear on that, learn to accept that as final for your own good. Such assumptions always backfired for you, aren't they?

I know by, "WE" you meant Internet hindu warriors. Not your War planners. Who are obviously smart enough not to pull Nuke rabbit so quickly out of hate quickly until nukes are used on your own land.

My war planners never said anything about not using nukes, they are smarter because we are worried about only the world opinion.( of course for u there is nothing called world opinion) Not about where u use them, any nukes against Indians is going to give us the excuse to retaliate strongly irrespective of your so called delusion.
U still think we would wait till u take any action, first thought for us would wipe out any possible known nuke sites.

Not worthy of reply. You obviously don't understand the war mechanisms.

 

[AMCA]

why is every Indian article has Indian weapons aiming at China.

When was the last time China said, this is for India.

If you must aim somewhere aim at the moon

Well, You are our only friendly enemy wherein half of each other's population still unaware of the war fought between us and the other half surprised hearing we share borders.

 

[dray]

I know by, "WE" you meant Internet hindu warriors. Not your War planners. Who are obviously smart enough not to pull Nuke rabbit so quickly out of hate quickly until nukes are used on your own land.

And what you are; principal adviser to Gen. Kiyani?

On topic: It's not about "hate", but about our overall distrust on Pakistan's ability to act maturely and responsibly with its nukes. If Pakistan uses its tactical nukes and we do nothing, Pakistan will further assume that they can take out a couple of our cities and we won't do anything. You only have this "First Use" advantage, our war planners are smart enough to not allow you any further leverage, in such a scenario they will not waste any time to cripple any further nuclear strike capability of the enemy. And we always have the dual advantage of bigger landmass and bigger military, we will survive, not sure about you.

The point is; don't start a war based on some silly assumption, and if the itching is too much to handle, then keep it conventional. Nukes would be a very bad idea, especially for you.

 

[illuminatidinesh]

And what you are; principal adviser to Gen. Kiyani?

On topic: It's not about "hate", but about our overall distrust on Pakistan's ability to act maturely and responsibly with its nukes. If Pakistan uses its tactical nukes and we do nothing, Pakistan will further assume that they can take out a couple of our cities and we won't do anything. You only have this "First Use" advantage, our war planners are smart enough to not allow you any further leverage, in such a scenario they will not waste any time to cripple any further nuclear strike capability of the enemy. And we always have the dual advantage of bigger landmass and bigger military, we will survive, not sure about you.

The point is; don't start a war based on some silly assumption, and if the itching is too much to handle, then keep it conventional. Nukes would be a very bad idea, especially for you.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian...here-does-stand-analysis-2.html#ixzz2ftoODGIE

Delusion ,paranoid and what else everything goes together.... I tried to tell him what u are saying above but???? I am done anyway.