What's new

India Ready For Pakistan Talks, U.N. Alarmed By Kashmir Violence

FalconsForPeace

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
1,132
Reaction score
3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The olive branch comes after 40 days of violent protests in Indian-ruled Kashmir.

SRINAGAR/NEW DELHI, Aug 17 (Reuters) - India is ready to send its top diplomat to Pakistan for talks focused on fighting cross-border terrorism, sources at India’s foreign ministry said on Wednesday, after a spike in tension in the disputed northernmost region of Kashmir.

Indian Foreign Secretary Subrahmanyam Jaishankar was willing to attend talks on the invitation of his Pakistani counterpart, the sources said, stressing that cross-border terrorism was central to the situation in Jammu and Kashmir state.

The olive branch comes after 40 days of violent protests in Indian-ruled Kashmir that were sparked by the killing by security forces of a field commander of Pakistan-based Islamic militant group Hizbul Mujahideen who enjoyed wide support.

At least 64 people have died and thousands been injured in clashes with security forces that have been denounced by Pakistan, which also claims the right to rule Jammu & Kashmir in a territorial dispute that dates back to partition in 1947.

The Indian sources, who declined to be identified, made it clear, however, that India “rejects in their entirety the self-serving allegations regarding the situation in J&K, which is an integral part of India.”

Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) is the name of India’s only Muslim-majority state that includes the disputed Kashmir region.

No comment was immediately available from Pakistan’s foreign ministry.

A top U.N. human rights official expressed “deep regret” at the failure of both the Indian and Pakistani authorities to grant access to the separate parts of Kashmir that each run to investigate allegations of serious human rights violations.

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein said in a statement issued in Geneva it was unfortunate that sincere attempts by the United Nations to independently assess the facts in relation to reports of human rights violations had failed.

“Without access, we can only fear the worst,” said Zeid.

DEADLY AMBUSH

The nuclear-armed neighbors, which have fought three wars since independence in 1947, both claim Kashmir in full but rule it in part.

In the latest violence on Wednesday, militants killed three members of the Indian security forces when they ambushed an army convoy and then fired on a police jeep that came to the scene.

In a worrying escalation the previous day, Indian security forces fired live rounds at a crowd of stone-throwing protesters in Kashmir’s Baramulla district, killing five and wounding 10.

Earlier, police and troops trying to control crowds had resorted to the use of shotguns, whose pellets are meant to incapacitate but not kill.

But residents of Kashmir say the shotguns have inflicted severe injuries and even blinded hundreds of people including bystanders.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi ratcheted up tensions in his annual Independence Day speech on Monday, accusing Pakistan of glorifying terrorism.

In a tit-for-tat escalation in the war of words between the nuclear-armed neighbors, Modi said he had received messages of support from leaders in restive regions of Pakistan, in particular the troubled southwestern province of Baluchistan.

India accuses Muslim Pakistan of supporting Kashmiri fighters while Pakistan accuses India of meddling in Pakistani trouble spots, in particular of helping separatists fighting the Pakistani state in resource-rich Baluchistan.

Both sides deny the accusations.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...-kashmir-protests_us_57b45ce2e4b0edfa80da56fb
 
It's a rather click-bait heading. However, Hindustan is ONLY interested in talking about ''cross-border'' terrorism and NOT about terrorism its committing in IOK.

India accuses Muslim Pakistan of supporting Kashmiri fighters while Pakistan accuses India of meddling in Pakistani trouble spots, in particular of helping separatists fighting the Pakistani state in resource-rich Baluchistan.

This is a ''nice'' unbiased journalist. LOL! What is the point of identifying one country's religion and not the others?
 
It's a rather click-bait heading. However, Hindustan is ONLY interested in talking about ''cross-border'' terrorism and NOT about terrorism its committing in IOK.



This is a ''nice'' unbiased journalist. LOL! What is the point of identifying one country's religion and not the others?
Whats the official name of Pakistan printed on the Passport? Islamic Republic of Pakistan, right? So Muslim Pakistan is apt.
 
Just wondering
Are they serious to talk with Pakistan on our issues or Finding new excuse that Pakistan is not ready to talk. Pakistan will not talk unless until Kashmir issue is not part of Talks.
 
Talks yes.. but only on Pakistan occupied kashmir, Cross Border Terrorism and... if needed Balochistan freedom. Hope people dont go by the title of this thread.
HAHAAH, were you touching yourself while you wrote that?
 
Just wondering
Are they serious to talk with Pakistan on our issues or Finding new excuse that Pakistan is not ready to talk. Pakistan will not talk unless until Kashmir issue is not part of Talks.
That's the catch, you can't have the cake and eat it too... Either talk on cross border terror - P0K and probably on Baluchistan or no talks...
It's Pakistan who invited for talks.. now if it backtracks... its a win win situation for INDIA.
 
That's the catch, you can't have the cake and eat it too... Either talk on cross border terror - P0K and probably on Baluchistan or no talks...
It's Pakistan who invited for talks.. now if it backtracks... its a win win situation for INDIA.

Why have any talks to begin with?
Musharraf offered the best deal for all sides where the violence would stop and all sides can claim victory. But Indians rejected it. Guess there were not done with bloodshed of innocence.

As for Azad Kashmir, lets have a vote, see how many would join India :pakistan:. But after that, we should have a vote in IOK

And you want to talk about Baluchistan, okay but we talk about Khalistan, the Red corridor and all the other separatists in India too. Fair is fair :whistle:
 
Talks yes.. but only on Pakistan occupied kashmir, Cross Border Terrorism and... if needed Balochistan freedom. Hope people dont go by the title of this thread.

Then we will ignore you. :p:

Why have any talks to begin with?
Musharraf offered the best deal for all sides where the violence would stop and all sides can claim victory. But Indians rejected it. Guess there were not done with bloodshed of innocence.

As for Azad Kashmir, lets have a vote, see how many would join India :pakistan:. But after that, we should have a vote in IOK

And you want to talk about Baluchistan, okay but we talk about Khalistan, the Red corridor and all the other separatists in India too. Fair is fair :whistle:

If we talk about all the separatist movements in India, we will be here until Christmas.
 
Talks in the current scenario are redundant. Only post a conflict can talks be of value as the past has shown.

Why have any talks to begin with?
Musharraf offered the best deal for all sides where the violence would stop and all sides can claim victory. But Indians rejected it. Guess there were not done with bloodshed of innocence.

As for Azad Kashmir, lets have a vote, see how many would join India :pakistan:. But after that, we should have a vote in IOK

And you want to talk about Baluchistan, okay but we talk about Khalistan, the Red corridor and all the other separatists in India too. Fair is fair :whistle:

Musharraf, you mean the 'master mind behind Kargil? Him and peace don't belong in the same sentence.

Sure, go ahead and conduct a vote, it'd be meanigless anyway. There are steps than need to be followed according to UN.

You are free to talk about whatever you with to. It'd be as meaningless as the whining you have done thus far.

Then we will ignore you. :p:

That'll work well for us. We are not the ones whining to the world that Pak doesn't talk to us, its the other way around.
 
no need to talk without bharti occupied Kashmir on agenda..
 
No it doesn't, because it means unless we talk about what we want these talks will go nowhere.

Again, that's fine with us. India in satisfied with the status quo; thus, no talks or talks that go nowhere are a perfectly acceptable scenario for us.

With Baloch and P0K angle being brought in by the government, no talks suit us even more. For Pak's mischeif in the vallley, we have plenty to respond back on in Pak's troubled areas.

Talks with any non-military Pak government are meaningless anyway, this current government in particular.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom