What's new

India,Pakistan only two countries starting construction of Nuclear plants

Red.Indian

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
324
Reaction score
0
depositphotos_2122361-Stop-nuclear-power.jpg

:devil::devil::taz::taz:

Mumbai, Dec. 7: India and Pakistan are the only two countries starting construction of a nuclear power plant in 2011, even as plants are being shut down in many countries and nuclear power generation has declined.

It may be a little too early to predict the long-term decline of nuclear energy; but analysis indicates that countries are turning to other energy sources as a result of high costs, low demand and perceived risks from recent disasters.

Despite reaching record levels in 2010, global installed nuclear capacity - the potential power generation from all existing plants - declined to 366.5 gigawatts (GW) in 2011, from 375.5 GW at the end of 2010.
Fall in production

“Due to increasing cost of production, a slowed demand for electricity and fresh memories of disaster in Japan, production of nuclear power fell in 2011,” the Washington DC-based World-watch Institute said in its report recently.

Much of the decline in installed capacity is the result of halted reactor construction around the world, the report pointed out adding in the first ten months of the current year, as many as 13 nuclear reactors were closed, thereby reducing the total number of reactors in operation around the world from 441 at the beginning of the year to 433.

It is also interesting that while construction of 16 new reactors began in 2010 — the highest number in over a decade — the number fell to just to two in 2011. The two countries to start construction are India and Pakistan.

Pointing out that China is an exception to the global slump in nuclear electricity generation in terms of both the number of plants being built and capacity of planned installations, the report added that the US too does not seem to be abandoning its nuclear power just yet.
Prominence to decline

Although nuclear power remains an important energy source for many countries, including Russia and France, it is likely that its prominence will continue to decrease.

To maintain current generation levels, the world would need to install an additional 18 GW by 2015 and another 175 GW by 2025. In the aftermath of Fukushima and in the context of a fragile global economy, an increase that sharp is improbable, the independent research organization pointed out.

China, India, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, and South Korea have together contributed around five GW of new installed capacity since the beginning of 2010. During this same period, nearly 11.5 GW of installed capacity has been shut down in France, Germany, Japan, and the UK. :cry::cry::cry:

Business Line : Columns / G Chandrashekhar : India, Pakistan are only two countries starting construction of N- power plant
 
Indicates that we are decades behind in technology. :coffee:
 
...Nothing wrong....
...But some misguided people, e.g. farmers and locals in TN, Jaitapur, Bhavnagar--misguided by vested interest and environmentists...think it to be some kind of blood thirsty monster......

they have good idea about what it is (of course you can think otherwise) but when it comes to their livelihood and home guess what they want!!!

Government spending thousands of crores for nuke plant can't spend couple of hundreds of crore to provide alternate employment and livelihood for those people!!!!!
 
...Nothing wrong....
...But some misguided people, e.g. farmers and locals in TN, Jaitapur, Bhavnagar--misguided by vested interest and environmentists...think it to be some kind of blood thirsty monster......
Their concerns aren't totally misplaced as proven by the Japan disaster, what we must ensure is that the safety measures are upto the mark & no dilly dallying on this whatsoever.
 
We have the world's largest reserves of thorium.

The world's soon-to-be most populous country.

A humungous population growing at a staggering rate.

Millions of people who have not even seen a light bulb in their lives.

An economy whose pace we need to maintain if we are to lift our millions out of poverty.

No foreseeable future in fossil fuel geenrated energy, with climate change fears ruling the minds nowadays.

Not enough hydropower potential.

Our population cannot afford to pay the huge price of solar power and wind turbines.

We do not have access to all the alternate technologies developed by the rich countries who have more than been responsible for most of the global pollution that is causing the climate change. The rich won't share their technologies with us.

...........

Do we even have so much as a choice?
 
The article says "low demand" is one of the reasons why they are shutting em down. Well in Asia there is a ton of demand. Nuke energy is safe and cheap. Damn euros, they used it for decades, now they're trying to act like it's a stupid source of energy so that Asian countries don't get in on the action. They're closing down ancient power plants and don't have enough demand to build newer ones and are acting like they're closing em down on purpose lol

alternative energy you say? loooooooooooool
I don't see how Asia can power itself with cow dung and wind power. Nice try.
 
The article says "low demand" is one of the reasons why they are shutting em down. Well in Asia there is a ton of demand. Nuke energy is safe and cheap. Damn euros, they used it for decades, now they're trying to act like it's a stupid source of energy so that Asian countries don't get in on the action. They're closing down ancient power plants and don't have enough demand to build newer ones and are acting like they're closing em down on purpose lol

alternative energy you say? loooooooooooool
I don't see how Asia can power itself with cow dung and wind power. Nice try.

BEST TO WORST
1. Wind power
2. concentrated solar power (CSP)
3. geothermal power
4. tidal power
5. solar photovoltaics(PV)
6. wave power
7. hydroelectric power
8. a tie between nuclearpower and coal with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS)


"Wind power is the most promising alternative source of energy,according to Mark Jacobson"
 
The naysayers of nuclear power should be told to give some alternatives for huge populated countries like India and Pakistan.
It is not like in europe where you have tiny populations in tiny countries.
 
Their concerns aren't totally misplaced as proven by the Japan disaster, what we must ensure is that the safety measures are upto the mark & no dilly dallying on this whatsoever.
..The Japanese episode has been blown out of proposition..may be as it unfolded in weeks....It was a 1960's vintage Hitachi design and struck by biggest earthquake...
I agree that the safety standards have to be of the highest standards.
No wonder NPCIL inspectors check every weld, even socket welds...and then we have a 10 to 15 year construction time.
 
Guys, there's been a lot of misreporting over the Fukushima incident. Usually served environmentalist propaganda and their ilks. Please read it up. It was mainly the company's fault.
 
But other nuclear plants are still under construction in other countries they just havent started being built in 2011.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom