What's new

India & Pak: Corruption tales

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Hindustan Times: Latest Breaking News from India, Cricket, Bollywood, World, Business, Videos

India & Pak: Corruption tales

by Khushwant Singh

We are forever moaning about corruption in our country — we are amongst the 10 most corrupt nations of the world. But we can find solace in the fact that things are much worse in our chief rival and closest neighbour Pakistan. Also, we are slowly getting the better of it; our friends across the border are heading for the worse. There is also a significant difference between the patterns of corruption in the two countries. In India, the creamy layer of the government, judiciary and the civil services is comparatively clean. It becomes murky in the middle; it is rampant in the lower ranks of the services. In Pakistan, it is the other way round. The top layer is massively corrupt, the middle and lower layers are less corrupt. Also, they have more corruption-related violence than we have. We indulge in character assassination; they dispense with niceties like characters and get down to assassination.

I came to these grim conclusions after reading Shyam Bhatia’s Goodbye Shahzadi (Roli). Though ostensibly “a political biography of Benazir Bhutto”, it gives a vivid description of the state of affairs during the regimes of her father Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, General Zia-ul Haq, President and ex-General Pervez Musharraf etc. It is a gripping tale which reads like a detective thriller. Shyam Bhatia has writing in his blood (he is the son of Prem Bhatia). He has been foreign correspondent of The Observer (London) and is editor of Asian Affairs. Though based in London, he travels frequently to the Middle East (he speaks Arabic).

Bhatia met up with Benazir when he was up in Oxford. She had come from Harvard to earn yet another degree at Oxford. At the time, she was a plain Jane; her ambition, nurtured by her father, was to get into the Pakistan Foreign Service and marry an eligible Pakistani. There were a few in college at her time, including cricketer Imran Khan. Benazir blossomed into a handsome woman, like her father became a rabble-rouser, and, after her father’s execution, the spokesperson of Pakistan People’s Party, the most popular political set up in the country.

Benazir was full of contradictions. When in the US or in Europe, she was a mod girl wearing jeans and enjoying a glass of wine with her meals. When in Pakistan, she wore salwar kameez and covered her head with a dupatta. An open-minded liberal democrat to the world, she was a haughty aristocrat in Sindh, rude to her staff — throwing ashtrays at her servants when she lost her temper. She agreed to an arranged marriage with Asif Zardari, a half-baked moustachioed son of a cinema producer. During his wife’s two tenures as Prime Minister, he amassed a vast fortune in real estate in England and Swiss banks. He came to be known as “Mister 10 percent”. Benazir, who did not get on with any member of her family, her mother Nusrat and her brothers Murtaza and Shah Nawaz (both were murdered), nor do their wives and children get on very well with her husband, condoned all his misdeeds. She made many enemies, among them President Musharraf and Nawaz Sharif (no paradigm of virtue). The mullah elements never accepted the idea of a woman being head of the state. The masses loved cheering her, voting for her but could not reconcile themselves being ruled by her. Her assassination did not come as a surprise.

There are many sordid details revealed by Shyam Bhatia for the first time. I give three examples. After Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged, his trousers were pulled down to photograph his genitals to see if he had been circumcised. This was done for possible evidence that he was not a proper Muslim, being the son of Hindu prostitute. The scientist A.Q. Khan who stole data from Holland and Canada to put together Pakistan’s atom bomb sold the know-how to Libya and Iran for huge sums of money and a villa on the Caspian. He confessed to his crimes. When Bhatia put this in one of his columns, Khan replied addressing him as a

“Hindu bastard”. Benazir herself carried formulas prepared by Khan in her pocket to hand over to the North Koreans in exchange for missile technology. With leaders such as these, what hope is there of Pakistan becoming a prosperous and peace-loving state?
 
Very interesting article.
 
Wow what a suprise an indian thinks that pakistan is not going to work in the state and india is better.
 
Khushwant Singh is quite old...late 90s if I'm not wrong....I am probably being cheap, but I wonder if his mind is as sharp as it used to be....
 
Khushwant Singh is quite old...late 90s if I'm not wrong....I am probably being cheap, but I wonder if his mind is as sharp as it used to be....

Lets check if he has one in the first place :D
 
yeh medically we have to check his brain somehwhere down instead of his head :D

Rrrite....damn....your India trip was a total waste...why didn't you check him then?
 
I dont have much love for men ;) besides he was much need by local women ;)

If you read this old fool, you will realise he misses his Lahore and his Pakistan women friends!

Local women is not his flavour of the century!
 
If you read this old fool, you will realise he misses his Lahore and his Pakistan women friends!

Local women is not his flavour of the century!

Good it seems he has a good taste ;)
 
True,

I also share his view!

The degree of difficulty does allure!

I enjoy caviare!

Damn difficult to get the genuine stuff!
 
Good it seems he has a good taste ;)


Singh was educated at Government College, Lahore and St. Stephen's College in Delhi before reading for the Bar at King's College London. His father, Sir Sobha Singh, was a prominent builder in Lutyens' Delhi.

In August 1947, days before the partition of India and Pakistan, Singh, then a lawyer practicing in the High Court in Lahore, drove to his family's summer cottage at Kasauli in the foothills of the Himalayas. Continuing on to Delhi along 200 miles of strangely vacant road, he came upon a Jeep full of armed Sikhs who boasted that they had just massacred a village of Muslims[1]. Such experiences were to be powerfully distilled in Singh's 1956 novel Train to Pakistan. (The 2006 edition of Train to Pakistan, published by Roli Books in New Delhi, also contains 66 photographs by Margaret Bourke-White that capture the partition's violent aftermath.)


Regards
 
Hindustan Times: Latest Breaking News from India, Cricket, Bollywood, World, Business, Videos

India & Pak: Corruption tales

by Khushwant Singh

We are forever moaning about corruption in our country — we are amongst the 10 most corrupt nations of the world. But we can find solace in the fact that things are much worse in our chief rival and closest neighbour Pakistan. Also, we are slowly getting the better of it; our friends across the border are heading for the worse. There is also a significant difference between the patterns of corruption in the two countries. In India, the creamy layer of the government, judiciary and the civil services is comparatively clean. It becomes murky in the middle; it is rampant in the lower ranks of the services. In Pakistan, it is the other way round. The top layer is massively corrupt, the middle and lower layers are less corrupt. Also, they have more corruption-related violence than we have. We indulge in character assassination; they dispense with niceties like characters and get down to assassination.

I came to these grim conclusions after reading Shyam Bhatia’s Goodbye Shahzadi (Roli). Though ostensibly “a political biography of Benazir Bhutto”, it gives a vivid description of the state of affairs during the regimes of her father Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, General Zia-ul Haq, President and ex-General Pervez Musharraf etc. It is a gripping tale which reads like a detective thriller. Shyam Bhatia has writing in his blood (he is the son of Prem Bhatia). He has been foreign correspondent of The Observer (London) and is editor of Asian Affairs. Though based in London, he travels frequently to the Middle East (he speaks Arabic).

Bhatia met up with Benazir when he was up in Oxford. She had come from Harvard to earn yet another degree at Oxford. At the time, she was a plain Jane; her ambition, nurtured by her father, was to get into the Pakistan Foreign Service and marry an eligible Pakistani. There were a few in college at her time, including cricketer Imran Khan. Benazir blossomed into a handsome woman, like her father became a rabble-rouser, and, after her father’s execution, the spokesperson of Pakistan People’s Party, the most popular political set up in the country.

Benazir was full of contradictions. When in the US or in Europe, she was a mod girl wearing jeans and enjoying a glass of wine with her meals. When in Pakistan, she wore salwar kameez and covered her head with a dupatta. An open-minded liberal democrat to the world, she was a haughty aristocrat in Sindh, rude to her staff — throwing ashtrays at her servants when she lost her temper. She agreed to an arranged marriage with Asif Zardari, a half-baked moustachioed son of a cinema producer. During his wife’s two tenures as Prime Minister, he amassed a vast fortune in real estate in England and Swiss banks. He came to be known as “Mister 10 percent”. Benazir, who did not get on with any member of her family, her mother Nusrat and her brothers Murtaza and Shah Nawaz (both were murdered), nor do their wives and children get on very well with her husband, condoned all his misdeeds. She made many enemies, among them President Musharraf and Nawaz Sharif (no paradigm of virtue). The mullah elements never accepted the idea of a woman being head of the state. The masses loved cheering her, voting for her but could not reconcile themselves being ruled by her. Her assassination did not come as a surprise.

There are many sordid details revealed by Shyam Bhatia for the first time. I give three examples. After Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was hanged, his trousers were pulled down to photograph his genitals to see if he had been circumcised. This was done for possible evidence that he was not a proper Muslim, being the son of Hindu prostitute. The scientist A.Q. Khan who stole data from Holland and Canada to put together Pakistan’s atom bomb sold the know-how to Libya and Iran for huge sums of money and a villa on the Caspian. He confessed to his crimes. When Bhatia put this in one of his columns, Khan replied addressing him as a

“Hindu bastard”. Benazir herself carried formulas prepared by Khan in her pocket to hand over to the North Koreans in exchange for missile technology. With leaders such as these, what hope is there of Pakistan becoming a prosperous and peace-loving state?

the sad thing is that he is ok with corruption in his own nation if there is more corruption in another which makes no sense and i really dont think that the upper echelon of the indian political elite is that clean or as they say in Urdu and i am translating this " bathed in milk"
 
This article for the most part is a complete waste. I say this for the following reasons:

1. The concept of taking solace in the fact that an adversary is worse off is IMHO one of the dumbest and most self destructive social attitude known to man. Its high prevalence in South Asia should come of no surprise based on the status of its constituent nations. Now I am well aware that Khushwant Singh as a satirist has written this article in accordance with his style; unfortunately without perspective (and the dearth of readership in India truly able to appreciate political satire- a social phenomenon btw) this article falls woefully short of really achieving anything meaningful.

2. The topic of corruption; which is actually a very interesting one, especially in the South Asian context, is hardly discussed in the article; which of course is ironic considering over 95% of the piece (including the title) mentions the said phenomenon. Anybody who has looked into this matter (and I hope many people in South Asia have) will realize that acts of corruption as we see them are merely the culminating result of systematic organizational (social and governmental) and socioeconomic shortcomings which in turn are on account of some complex and other not-so-complex reasons. Khushwant Singh's attempts at drawing comparisons between the corruption models of India and Pakistan are at best insipid. Its not that Pakistan's corruption is top heavy while India's is bottom heavy; but rather that the model itself is vastly different and hence not really comparable. It frustrates me to no end when people write about corruption like they would when describing landscapes or any other natural phenomena....
Khushwant Singh said:
In India, the creamy layer of the government, judiciary and the civil services is comparatively clean. It becomes murky in the middle; it is rampant in the lower ranks of the services. In Pakistan, it is the other way round. The top layer is massively corrupt, the middle and lower layers are less corrupt. Also, they have more corruption-related violence than we have. We indulge in character assassination; they dispense with niceties like characters and get down to assassination.
Nonsense; none of this stuff is constant, they are directly proportional to the driving mechanism of each individual system.

3. There is no new information in this article that hasn't already been beaten to death previously... corrupt leaders, swiss accounts, assassinations, humiliation, illicit nuclear trade etc etc. So what? Simply mentioning these things again and again is akin to making Bush jokes or inserting more CGI "special" effects into a movie scene... neither of them are amusing or "special" anymore.

It would have been far more productive to either talk about the models of corruption themselves; or better yet, to come up with ideas to limit them. And yes, all of this could have been done in a satirical manner.
 
Back
Top Bottom