No, Iranian automakers are state-controlled, selling models based on licensed foreign tech(usually obsolete). Iranian automakers survive because of the protectionism, that's all.Iranian car brands are mostly joint ventures I think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, Iranian automakers are state-controlled, selling models based on licensed foreign tech(usually obsolete). Iranian automakers survive because of the protectionism, that's all.Iranian car brands are mostly joint ventures I think.
And that was in 2010. In 2011, Chinese brand automakers collectively took a blood bath, while foreign automakers picked up the ball and ran, further increasing the market share to 72%.The fact that Hyundai sells more car in China than any Chinese car company, pretty much ends this this discussion.
It is hard to say. The platforms are licensed Peugeots, Suzukis, and Kias, but wear localized styling and Iranian brand.Oh.. so all these cars are foreign?
Yes, Tata Nano. Famous world wide for its innovative engineering.i thought india came out with its own famous car known world wide for a second.
kid``they are arguing about domestic car production, you need to find a better place for your inferior complexityThe fact that Hyundai sells more car in China than any Chinese car company, pretty much ends this this discussion.
Winners And Losers In China's Car Market - Forbes
It is hard to say. The platforms are licensed Peugeots, Suzukis, and Kias, but wear localized styling and Iranian brand.
Yes, Tata Nano. Famous world wide for its innovative engineering.
kid``they are arguing about domestic car production, you need to find a better place for your inferior complexity
china is 1st.
What he says is true. Hyundai sells more cars in China than any of China's domestic brand automakers do.kid``they are arguing about domestic car production, you need to find a better place for your inferior complexity
kid``they are arguing about domestic car production, you need to find a better place for your inferior complexity
Oh.. so all these cars are foreign?
i thought india came out with its own famous car known world wide for a second.
What Can Tata's Nano Teach Detroit? - BusinessWeekyou brought your ar$s kissing skills to a new level```lol, next time when the bhartis start raping korean plastic women donno whether you lot will enjoy the way your current american daddys doing atm?
American are highly respective of India for its innovations. Not so much of Chinese companies.What Can Tata's Nano Teach Detroit?
As the commercial model of India's microcar is unveiled, U.S. carmakers would do well to learn from the innovations that brought it about
When Tata Motors (TTM) unveiled a prototype of its Nano microcar at the Delhi Auto Show in January 2008, auto executives around the world were aflutter. Quickly, they hustled teams to India to document the planned $2,000 "people's car." And industry watchers and innovation experts soon reported on the engineering and supply-chain breakthroughs behind the car.
Some 14 months later, Tata is set to show off the commercial version of the Nano, on Mar. 23. Today, the U.S. auto industry is struggling to survive, with General Motors (GM), once the world's biggest carmaker, on the brink of bankruptcy. Look beyond the Nano halo and it's clear that Tata Motors has problems of its own, from the $2.3 billion in debt it took on to purchase Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford Motor (F) last year to the sums sunk into the Nano assembly plant in West Bengal that had to be abandoned. On top of that, there are the Nano competitors in development.
Still, no one disputes that the Nano is innovative on multiple levels—from its engineering to its marketing to its manufacturing. So it's hard to avoid the question: What can a humbled Detroit learn from the Tata Nano?
Haha obviously there are more people in China than Korea, so they produce more.
Truth hurts. Don't be mad at me!