toxic_pus
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2009
- Messages
- 1,852
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Eh? Really? We look like Chinese?Bongs if I can remember my anthropology classes correctly
Man, gotta get me a new mirror.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh? Really? We look like Chinese?Bongs if I can remember my anthropology classes correctly
Eh? Really? We look like Chinese?
Man, gotta get me a new mirror.
That is interesting because according to the opinion among some Islamic and Christian scholars, Adam was sent down to earth to south India also known as Adam's bridge.
I really doubt that Oriental Chinese have anything in common with Indians. I mean if that was true we'd see a few Chinese looking dark skinned people as well?
Earliest recorded Western civilization begins from the Egyptian Civilization. That doesn't mean that the Asian civilization didn't exist at the time. Three is a good chance that there were civilization even during the Ice age.
One theory that extends this thought is the fact that people all over the world, built Pyramids as their first massive structure. The Egyptian and the Mayans never met each other. There was no cultural exchange possible. Yet they both had the bright idea to build Pyramids. How come?
It is obvious there was some common ancestor between them, hence an older civilization - like the mythical Atlantis.
I have been told that pre-Independence there were no India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. It was called the Indian Subcontinent.
My question is, were the people there called Indians?(inc. Indians, Pakistanis and Bangladeshis). Or something else.
@matankhan, You are referring to Republic of India where as the discussion is regarding India as in Indian subcontinent. pre-Indus valley civilization, more than 10,000 years back !!
Politicization of science. Just like Global Warming.
I read the topic and without even opening I knew we have open a thread for India bashing.
It was not being ignored coz it was a sarcastic comment.Hi,
A very interesting question---is it being conveniently being ignored or people just missed it.
Wrong. People living in the subcontinent were infact known as Indians and the Europeans in their first misguided voyage, to establish direct contact with India, ended up on the shores of the Islands in the Caribbean and the Americas and the native Americans were wrongly called as Indians.I believe that either they were known by their ethnic languages and tribal heritage---there was no such thing as india before the british took over the sub-continent.
India as it exists today is the creation of the british conquest of multiple nation states of the su continent---each nation state culturally and luistically as diverse as britain to france to germany to switzerland to italy austria to scandinivian countries to the ex commy states.
Another stupid wet dream of wannabes.Inida today is the same entity as the USSR was---.
medical experts comments needed .How much of this is true.We Indians and Mongoloids are as different as chalk and cheese
Hi,
A very interesting question---is it being conveniently being ignored or people just missed it.
I believe that either they were known by their ethnic languages and tribal heritage---there was no such thing as india before the british took over the sub-continent.
India as it exists today is the creation of the british conquest of multiple nation states of the su continent---each nation state culturally and luistically as diverse as britain to france to germany to switzerland to italy austria to scandinivian countries to the ex commy states.
Inida today is the same entity as the USSR was---.
It was not being ignored coz it was a sarcastic comment.
Wrong. People living in the subcontinent were infact known as Indians and the Europeans in their first misguided voyage, to establish direct contact with India, ended up on the shores of the Islands in the Caribbean and the Americas and the native Americans were wrongly called as Indians.
That should tell you something, but alas, you people want to conveniently ignore the facts in the vain hope of a notion of superior nationalism - which, sorry to say, barely exists.
Another stupid wet dream of wannabes.
Clutch to straws if that makes you happy, truth wont change.
and yes, as the article originally mentions, India is the "mother" to all Asians.