What's new

India may not send troops to Syria

H.B.

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 22, 2015
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Country
India
Location
India
India is likely to say it has “no interest” in sending troops to Syria to fight in any of the anti-IS coalitions, but could indicate it is open for a bigger role in the Syrian regional reconciliation in West Asia, officials have told The Hindu. The issue is expected to be discussed when Syrian Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Walid al Moualem meets both National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj during a three-day visit to New Delhi that begins on Monday.

Diplomatic sources said the visit is significant as it comes just ahead of a series of trips by the Modi government focused on West Asia. Later this week Ms. Swaraj will travel to Israel and Palestine ahead of expected visits by leaders of both countries to India. Prime Minister Modi is likely to visit Saudi Arabia “shortly”, and could visit to Iran later in the year, sources confirmed.

A Syrian official said Mr. Moualem could ask India to play a “conciliatory” role in reconciling the positions of all the major players in the region, given India’s standing with them.

While officials said India “is open” to discussing the larger role of assisting the peace process, the government has taken a considered position against joining any of the coalitions fighting the IS in Syria and Iraq. The Hindu has learnt that the Prime Minister’s Office listened to a series of briefings in the last few weeks on India’s options in the Syrian civil war . Apart from presentations on the spread of IS terrorism to Afghanistan, and the possibility of radicalisation in India, the briefings from top security agencies included a look at the three different coalitions now engaged in the fight against the radical terror group — the U.S.-led coalition of more than 60 countries that are conducting strikes on IS locations and supporting anti-Assad rebel groups, the Russian forces sent in to support President Assad’s Syrian military forces against IS and other groups, and the newly announced Saudi Arabia-led coalition of 34 Muslim nations, which claims it will attack IS as well.

The considered opinion of military and intelligence officials was that it would be inadvisable to offer any operational support beyond the current intelligence that has led to several IS-bound Indians to be apprehended. A senior official who was privy to the briefings told The Hindu, “We will also not do anything that could lead to the spread of IS terror inside India.”

Officials also rejected the possibility of joining a “ceasefire-monitoring mechanism” outside of the UN mandate, given pressure from the U.S. to join its coalition. Speculation over Indian support has been growing since Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar spoke on the issue on his return from a visit to U.S. naval facilities and meetings in Washington. “We have made it clear that if there is a UN resolution and if there is UN flag and a UN mission, then as per India’s policy to operate under UN flag, we will participate,” Mr. Parrikar had said.

“India is not interested to send troops as of now. If Syrians seek support, India can provide them indirect support," a senior official said, referring to humanitarian aid, agricultural support and financial aid to develop its energy interests. "Syrians have offered oil fields to India. India is interested but the security situation is difficult. But India would prefer to purchase oil fields from Syria now and keep them frozen for future use," the official confirmed ahead of Mr. Moualem’s visit.

Mr. Moualem who is accompanied Syria’s Vice-Foreign Minister, leads the most senior Syrian delegation to visit India since the civil war began in 2011. He will be followed closely by another key figure of the Assad regime, advisor Bouthaina Shaaban, a regular visitor. According to diplomatic sources, Syrian President Bashar al Assad has been grateful of India’s position on Syria, opposing the U.S. and allies demands for regime change, while also refusing to criticise Russia’s military support to the Syrian military campaign.

While there was some pressure on India to do both, as well as a request from the Obama government to join the anti-ISIS coalition, India has resisted all three requests so far.

India may not send troops to Syria - The Hindu
 
. . .
But I thought if its a United Nations sanctioned Mission, then India would have liked to participate..

Is this outside UN mission approved? if Yes then India will never agree to it as we already made that clear some months back...
 
.
But I thought if its a United Nations sanctioned Mission, then India would have liked to participate..

Is this outside UN mission approved? if Yes then India will never agree to it as we already made that clear some months back...

India will play all sides here. Middle East has surplus oil with few buyers given China's slowing economy and increasing focus on renewables worldwide. Check the bolded line in the OP. Motive is to secure oilfields.
 
. . . .
India will play all sides here. Middle East has surplus oil with few buyers given China's slowing economy and increasing focus on renewables worldwide. Check the bolded line in the OP. Motive is to secure oilfields.

See Sir, you have said this as per the article
"Syrians have offered oil fields to India. India is interested but the security situation is difficult. But India would prefer to purchase oil fields from Syria now and keep them frozen for future use,

If i remember correctly, Iran was occupying around 15-16% of Indian Oil Imports before sanction and post sanction it fell t around 5-6% implying about 66% fall... Now Iran is again asking us to up our Oil Import from them and they want in Euros.. and we are planning to increase Iran Oil with a long term contract

Now consider the Syrian Situation. India will buy OILFIELDS via either ONGC Videsh Limited or may be OIL India Overseas Division or via a pvt company like Reliance or Essar. Practically Syrian crisis will last at least close to a decade something similar to Afghanistan types. So keeping a dead asset with no return filters out pvt companies.. This leaves either OVL or OIL (Overseas). With more Cash and Networth OVL (ONGC Videsh Limited) moves ahead for exploring the oil fields.

Now again for a price to buy, maintain and provide basic adequate security for say 8-10 years with minimal chance of Oil Drilling, supply to refinery or downstream implies another locked asset with no return.

Now why a upstream or major Oil Exploration company will do that and block its assets and cash? We are also negotiating with Russia for hydrocarbons as per the MOU. we can very well use OVL there to do exploration and find Oil & Gas and use it to downstream refineries and earn money as well as meet our energy needs.

Sir, are you able to get what i am meaning to say here.. Locking up an investment for a decade will be counter productive to Indian Energy needs..
 
.
[QUOTE="H.B., post: 8075492, member: 1742end ]India will play all sides here. Middle East has surplus oil with few buyers given China's slowing economy and increasing focus on renewables worldwide. Check the bolded line in the OP. Motive is to secure oilfields.[/QUOTE]


It'd be a bad investment .besides this is pure speculation.given the horrendous record the Assad regime enjoys in Syria courtesy their war time atrocities , their days are numbered .all that is pending is an honourable settlement which would take Iran / Russia's interests into consideration & some mechanism to grant Assad & the members of his regime immunity , safe passage & asylum .

.Give it a couple of years. A further influx of refugees , a couple of spectacular attacks like Paris & particularly a new incumbent in the white house & you'd see the ball set rolling for such a settlement.

The present situation is untenable given the fact that the anti Assad regime's western backers are now seeing things for what they are .The Assad regime is a lesser evil compared to Daesh & the rest of the opposition are simply not strong enough to effect a regime change on their own .Even if they do , which seems a remote possibility they are too splitered to form an effective government post Assad.

Which brings us to Daesh.The single biggest gainer in this turmoil .more so after the announcement of the all Sunni alliance headed by Saudi & the deepening of the rift between Saudi & Iran .
 
.
Did anyone asked you to send

Even if you send your old friend russia will be killing them too due to russia against US led forces
 
.
buying Oil fields in Syria has one big concern - who are you going to buy it from? The way things are on the ground right now, the government that "owns" the oil fields can change a few times in the immediate future. They may not honor the rights purchased from other govts or regimes.
 
.
When had we agreed to send? Even an UN mission, without discrimination to Assad will let India to share its troop under blue helmets.
 
. . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom