India - "Made in Britain"

[farhan_9909]

Not modern India but Pakistan is the true successor state of ancient Indian(named after indus river of Pakistan)

 

[Lord ZeN]

Pakistan- A country made by Britain
Islam - A religion named by Arabs
Urdu - A language standardized by Indian Muslims.

Corrected it for you. What comes around also goes around buddy.

 

[dray]

Not modern India but Pakistan is the true successor state of ancient Indian(named after indus river of Pakistan)

Astonishing to see Pakistanis claiming succession rights over a pagan culture and faith!

 

[Menace2Society]

Astonishing to see Pakistanis claiming succession rights over a pagan culture and faith!

You were given culture by us. Deal with your reality.

 

[Lord ZeN]

Astonishing to see Pakistanis claiming succession rights over a pagan culture and faith!

Claims , claims and more claims. That's all they can do. They hate India thus claim it to be an illegitimate , evil and fake country. But does that make any difference ?

 

[Maira La]

Considering for once that this is not a troll thread, 'India' was well known to the European corporate world much before the British East India Company was even formed. Portugal's Estado Da India was already dominating the pepper market in the 16th century. England was just among other many European countries like the French, Netherlands, Denmark, Prussia, Russia or Sweden to launch maritime ventures across South and South East Asia. India already existed while the first writer of the company set foot at India. This is why I feel the thread failed to meet its objective in the beginning itself.

India was the European term for the rich fertile land south of China, originating from the Greek word for the land "beyond the Inuds", the farthest extent of Ancient Greek conquests. Current Indian Subcontinent was Britain's East India while Indonesia was called Nederlands Indië (Dutch term for India). Vietnam could also be French East India, instead of French Indo-China, had it not been for Vietnam's Sinic influenced culture and people (which confused the French).

@Atanz @save_ghenda

India already existed while the first writer of the company set foot at India. This is why I feel the thread failed to meet its objective in the beginning itself.

Lol, every land always existed, whatever you call it. It's set in stone right? (literally! )

 

[Lord ZeN]

You were given culture by us. Deal with your reality.

Like i said Pakistanis can claim anything but that doesn't make any difference.

 

[ito]

The OP is never know for his think power or logical conclusions, but this post should top it all. What was he thinking when he was typing this nonsense ?

 

[Norwegian]

This thread is hilarious

 

[Echo_419]

Showing off one's inferiority complex or lack of history lessons.

Maybe you can learn something today is you can comprehend it.

" What are the arguments FOR British colonialism benefiting the subcontinent? It is often claimed that the British bequeathed India its political unity. But India had enjoyed cultural and geographical unity throughout the ages, going back to Emperor Ashoka in the 3rd century BC and Adi Shankara travelling from Kerala to Kashmir and from Dwarka to Puri in the 7th century AD, establishing his temples everywhere. As a result, the yearning for political unity existed throughout; warriors and kings tried to dominate the entire subcontinent, usually unsuccessfully. But with modern transport and communications, national unity would have been fulfilled without colonial rule, just as in equally fragmented 19th century Italy. And what political unity can we celebrate when the horrors of Partition (1 million dead, 13 million displaced, billions of rupees of property destroyed) were the direct result of deliberate British policies of "divide and rule" that fomented religious antagonisms? "

How a Debate Was Won in London Against British Colonisation of India, by Shashi Tharoor - NDTV

He has a passion for twisting history & facts

 

[SRP]

And Pakistan created by a CONVERT

 

[Srinivas]

Not modern India but Pakistan is the true successor state of ancient Indian(named after indus river of Pakistan)

Columbus went in search of India and found America and so New world belong to India

 

[nForce]

The OP is never know for his think power or logical conclusions, but this post should top it all. What was he thinking when he was typing this nonsense ?

It's simple, he was not thinking this time.

He created the thread to poke me.

 

[Srinivas]

Then I wonder what land the Ancient chinese used to call Yindoo, Persians ---- Hindu and Greeks ----- India

India was the European term for the rich fertile land south of China, originating from the Greek word for the land "beyond the Inuds", the farthest extent of Ancient Greek conquests. Current Indian Subcontinent was Britain's East India while Indonesia was called Nederlands Indië (Dutch term for India). Vietnam could also be French East India, instead of French Indo-China, had it not been for Vietnam's Sinic influenced culture and people (which confused the French).

@Atanz @save_ghenda




Lol, every land always existed, whatever you call it. It's set in stone right? (literally! )

 

[ito]

It's simple, he was not thinking this time.

He created the thread to poke me.

He himself is becoming a joke