What's new

India looks to expand strategic footprint in Indian Ocean

anant_s

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
5,600
Reaction score
92
Country
India
Location
India
India looks to expand strategic footprint in Indian Ocean

Indian-Navy--II.jpg

NEW DELHI: India is expanding its strategic footprint in the Indian Ocean. A trilateral security group of India, Maldives and Sri Lanka will be expanded to include Mauritius and Seychelles. Senior officials of the trilateral group will meet on December 19 to prepare the ground for a formal joining of these countries, where deputy national security advisor Nehchal Sandhu will lead the Indian delegation.

The government hopes that the third trilateral meeting at the NSA level would be able to formalize this arrangement before the general elections. Taking the Indian Ocean more seriously as a target for India's diplomacy, the external affairs ministry is also crafting a new territorial division to take care of Indian Ocean countries.

After the second trilateral meeting, the three countries decided to harmonize identification and tracking services and training in maritime domain awareness while India committed to sharing automatic identification system (AIS) data, coordinate efforts on search and rescue efforts etc. India agreed to share with Sri Lanka and Maldives its long range identification centre (LRIT) and merchant ship information system (MSIS) for tracking merchant vessels.

The three countries also agreed to intensify surveillance of each other's exclusive economic zones (EEZ). India has taken the lead in this, in an effort to tie the other countries in an information and security network where Indian information systems held the key. However, India's recurrent problem appears to be the gap between promise and delivery. Maldives has complained that India has provided very few of the radars promised to monitor the 26 atolls of the island nation. Repeated delays by India make it easier for these countries to opt for China as an alternative source of security, just what India is trying to avoid.

In recent years, China has made tremendous inroads in the Indian Ocean region, including in Maldives and Sri Lanka. As India's political establishment seems determined to ruin political relations with Sri Lanka even further, the security establishment fears its impact on the security relationship between the countries.
The US has offered to set up a security presence in Maldives, even offering a bilateral security agreement. This has been stalled for the time being, but Indian officials say this could return at any time.
.

04zzlandbig.jpg


India looks to expand strategic footprint in Indian Ocean - The Times of India
 
What is 'increasing strategic footprint' mean here?

Sadly, india is a useless land mass with zero strategic importance...indian waters are as useless as india itself is...

I hope indians aren't thinking of deploying air craft carriers in Persian Gulf, China Sea, and Mediterranean sea (as the redundant map is trying to exaggerate india's naval interests) :lol:

Mental masturbation at best....india isn't relevant at all...

All the important water and/or land routes are controlled by Pakistan Military....indians control their useless, dirty, and firthy hindu 'ganga' lands :)
 
What is 'increasing strategic footprint' mean here?

Sadly, india is a useless land mass with zero strategic importance...indian waters are as useless as india itself is...

I hope indians aren't thinking of deploying air craft carriers in Persian Gulf, China Sea, and Mediterranean sea (as the redundant map is trying to exaggerate india's naval interests) :lol:

Mental masturbation at best....india isn't relevant at all...

All the important water and/or land routes are controlled by Pakistan Military....indians control their useless, dirty, and firthy hindu 'ganga' lands :)

And you are obsessed with the Firthy Hindu Ganga Land. Man , you DO have a fetish for India.. just admit it :)
By the way, it is F I L T H Y... not firthy, unless you invented a new word :D
 
And you are obsessed with the Firthy Hindu Ganga Land. Man , you DO have a fetish for India.. just admit it :)

What Fetish? Just commenting on the forum...
By the way, it is F I L T H Y... not firthy, unless you invented a new word :D

Offcourse, indians would know the spellings of their characteristic better :D
 
What is 'increasing strategic footprint' mean here?

Sadly, india is a useless land mass with zero strategic importance...indian waters are as useless as india itself is...

I hope indians aren't thinking of deploying air craft carriers in Persian Gulf, China Sea, and Mediterranean sea (as the redundant map is trying to exaggerate india's naval interests) :lol:

Mental masturbation at best....india isn't relevant at all...

All the important water and/or land routes are controlled by Pakistan Military....indians control their useless, dirty, and firthy hindu 'ganga' lands :)

Oh its u again,Auz the Low IQ fart.
 
3379_1.png


The area in discussion is vital for a huge volume of international maritime traffic passes through the region. As shown in figure above a lot of crude oil shipping lanes also lie in the area. in this context countries would want to have it secured for trade and energy supplies.
Given the massive economic stakes involved, coupled with persistent problem of piracy, there isn't anything surprising that we want to increase our presence.
At the end of the day a safe and secure trading sea-route is in interest of all nations in the region.
& may i reiterate that there is nothing threatening to anybody because of this intent.

thumb.php
 
Oh its u again,Auz the Low IQ fart.

Low IQ fart? LMAO! Since when you have started to talk like an idiot and that too of Chinese caliber who believe in IQ and low IQs etc? :D

My IQ is enough to handle all Indians on this forum single-handedly when it comes to trolling :lol:

Anyways, I respect you for your knowledge in military history. I'm just baiting inexperienced kids here so I can 'train' them how to behave nicely on PDF..You don't need to get involved..So back-off before it gets ugly.

I've trained pretty much all of untrained indians here...few new members here and there are still left..but over-all, level of indian trolling on this forum has gone down by trillion % and it is very clean now..Mashallah.

Good for the forum quality over-all. This forum is important since it has more global penetration than ALL of indian media combined (Cyberspace).

My services to this forum shall be written in golden words one day :pakistan: :pleasantry:

3379_1.png


The area in discussion is vital for a huge volume of international maritime traffic passes through the region. As shown in figure above a lot of crude oil shipping lanes also lie in the area. in this context countries would want to have it secured for trade and energy supplies.
Given the massive economic stakes involved, coupled with persistent problem of piracy, there isn't anything surprising that we want to increase our presence.
At the end of the day a safe and secure trading sea-route is in interest of all nations in the region.
& may i reiterate that there is nothing threatening to anybody because of this intent.

thumb.php

Asian Navies of India, Pakistan, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and probably Japan too must co-operate with each other for the protection of trade and commerce going through Indian Ocean Region. It will be in the interest of all of us. And there would be no space left where foreign powers could intervene and exploit our bullshit of 'competing' with each other for no reasons...

Asia must man up and take the responsibility of keeping its sea-lanes open and safe by itself. Let U.S Navy guard Atlantic...
 
as for IN,it has a huge opportunity to control entire IOR through various choke points.we've good co-p with Vietnam,Indonesia,Singapore in the east,Sri Lanka and Australia in the south and Maldives and Seychelles on the south west along with Oman and Iran.we've listening stations(declared) in Seychelles and Oman,deployed Radars in Maldives as well as ICG patrols the water around it.all we need is to keep the scope of co-op ever increasing.
 
Asian Navies of India, Pakistan, China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, and probably Japan too must co-operate with each other for the protection of trade and commerce going through Indian Ocean Region. It will be in the interest of all of us. And there would be no space left where foreign powers could intervene and exploit our bullshit of 'competing' with each other for no reasons...
Asia must man up and take the responsibility of keeping its sea-lanes open and safe by itself. Let U.S Navy guard Atlantic...

:tup: there you are Sir.

A safe IOR from Hormuz to Malacca is in interest of entire region and stake holders. this region encompasses some of the biggest economies, energy users and largest crude oil producers and while all nations would want certain hold on the region, it is better to take care of ourselves then let any non-regional powers :big_boss:get into the way. :buba_phone:

Oil traffic through Hormuz and Malacca
worldchokepointsmap.jpg



Malacca

The Strait of Malacca, linking the Indian and Pacific Oceans, is the shortest sea route between the Middle East and growing Asian markets.

The Strait of Malacca, located between Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, links the Indian Ocean to the South China Sea and Pacific Ocean. Malacca is the shortest sea route between Persian Gulf suppliers and the Asian markets—notably China, Japan, South Korea, and the Pacific Rim. Oil shipments through the Strait of Malacca supply China and Indonesia, two of the world's fastest growing economies. It is the key chokepoint in Asia with an estimated 15.2 million bbl/d flow in 2011, compared to 13.8 million bbl/d in 2007. Crude oil makes up about 90 percent of flows, with the remainder being petroleum products.

At its narrowest point in the Phillips Channel of the Singapore Strait, Malacca is only 1.7 miles wide creating a natural bottleneck, as well as potential for collisions, grounding, or oil spills. According to the International Maritime Bureau's Piracy Reporting Centre, piracy, including attempted theft and hijackings, is a constant threat to tankers in the Strait of Malacca, although the number of attacks has dropped due to the increased patrols by the littoral states' authorities since July 2005.

Over 60,000 vessels transit the Strait of Malacca per year. If the strait were blocked, nearly half of the world's fleet would be required to reroute around the Indonesian archipelago through Lombok Strait, located between the islands of Bali and Lombok, or the Sunda Strait, located between Java and Sumatra.

There have been several proposals to build bypass options and reduce tanker traffic through the Strait of Malacca, but most have not been followed through. China is on schedule to complete the Myanmar-China Oil and Gas Pipeline in 2013, two parallel oil and gas pipelines that stretch from Myanmar's ports in the Bay of Bengal to the Yunnan province of China. The oil pipeline will be an alternative transport route for crude oil imports from the Middle East to potentially bypass the Strait of Malacca. The oil pipeline capacity is expected to reach about 440,000 bbl/d.


Hormuz

The Strait of Hormuz is by far the world's most important chokepoint with an oil flow of about 17 million barrels per day in 2011.

Located between Oman and Iran, the Strait of Hormuz connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. The Strait of Hormuz is the world's most important oil chokepoint due to its daily oil flow of about 17 million bbl/d in 2011, up from between 15.7-15.9 million bbl/d in 2009-2010. Flows through the Strait in 2011 were roughly 35 percent of all seaborne traded oil, or almost 20 percent of oil traded worldwide. More than 85 percent of these crude oil exports went to Asian markets, with Japan, India, South Korea, and China representing the largest destinations. In addition, Qatar exports about 2 trillion cubic feet per year of liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the Strait of Hormuz, accounting for almost 20 percent of global LNG trade. Furthermore, Kuwait imports LNG volumes that travel northward through the Strait of Hormuz. These flows totaled about 100 billion cubic feet per year in 2010.

At its narrowest point, the Strait is 21 miles wide, but the width of the shipping lane in either direction is only two miles, separated by a two-mile buffer zone. The Strait is deep and wide enough to handle the world's largest crude oil tankers, with about two-thirds of oil shipments carried by tankers in excess of 150,000 deadweight tons.

Most potential options to bypass Hormuz are currently not operational. Only Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) presently have pipelines able to ship crude oil outside of the Gulf, and only the latter two countries currently have additional pipeline capacity to circumvent Hormuz. At the start of 2012, the total available pipeline capacity from the two countries combined, which is not utilized, was approximately 1 million bbl/d. The amount could potentially increase to 4.3 million bbl/d by the end of this year, as both countries have recently completed steps to increase standby pipeline capacity to bypass the Strait.

Iraq has one major crude oil pipeline, the Kirkuk-Ceyhan (Iraq-Turkey) Pipeline that transports oil from the north of Iraq to the Turkish Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. This pipeline pumped about 0.4 million bbl/d in 2011, far below its nameplate capacity of 1.6 million bbl/d and it has been the target of sabotage attacks. Moreover, this pipeline cannot send additional volumes to bypass the Strait of Hormuz unless it receives oil from southern Iraq via the Strategic Pipeline, which links northern and southern Iraq. Currently, portions of the Strategic Pipeline are closed, and renovations to the Strategic Pipeline could take several years to complete.

Saudi Arabia has the 745-mile-long Petroline, also known as the East-West Pipeline, which runs from across Saudi Arabia from its Abqaiq complex to the Red Sea. The Petroline system consists of two pipelines with a total nameplate capacity of about 4.8 million bbl/d. The 56-inch pipeline has a nameplate capacity of 3 million bbl/d and its current throughput is about 2 million bbl/d. The 48-inch pipeline had been operating in recent years as a natural gas pipeline, but Saudi Arabia recently converted it back to an oil pipeline. The switch could increase Saudi Arabia's spare oil pipeline capacity to bypass the Strait of Hormuz from 1 million bbl/d to 2.8 million bbl/d, which is only attainable if the system is able to operate at its full nameplate capacity.

The UAE constructed a 1.5 million bbl/d Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline that runs from Habshan, a collection point for Abu Dhabi's onshore oil fields, to the port of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, allowing crude oil shipments to circumvent Hormuz. The pipeline was recently opened and the first shipment of 500,000 barrels of oil was sent through the pipeline to the Fujairah oil terminal where it was loaded on a tanker and sent to the Pak-Arab Refinery in Pakistan. The pipeline will be able to export up to 1.5 million bb/d, or more than half of UAE's total net oil exports, once it reaches full operational capacity in the near future. However, the UAE does not currently have the ability to utilize this pipeline completely, until it ramps to full capacity. In late May, Fujairah ruler Sheikh Hamad bin Mohammed Al-Sharqi noted that this pipeline capacity could rise further to a maximum 1.8 million bbl/d.




Currently Operable Pipelines that are Unavailable as Bypass Options
Saudi Arabia also has two additional pipelines that run parallel to the Petroline system and bypass the Strait of Hormuz, but neither of them have the ability to transport additional volumes of oil should the Strait of Hormuz be closed. The Abqaiq-Yanbu natural gas liquids pipeline has a capacity of 290,000 bbl/d and is running at capacity. The IPSA (Iraqi Pipeline through Saudi Arabia) is used to transport natural gas to Saudi Arabia's western coast. It was originally built to carry 1.65 million bbl/d of crude oil from Iraq to the Red Sea, but Saudi Arabia later converted it to carry natural gas, and has not announced plans to convert it back to transport crude oil.

Other pipelines, such as the Trans-Arabian Pipeline (TAPLINE) running from Qaisumah in Saudi Arabia to Sidon in Lebanon, have been out of service for years due to war damage, disuse, or political disagreements, and would require a complete renovation before being usable. Relatively small quantities, several hundred thousand barrels per day at most, could be trucked to mitigate closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Currently Operable Crude Oil Pipelines that Bypass the Strait of Hormuz
Pipeline Kirkuk-Ceyhan
(Iraq-Turkey) Pipeline 1 Petroline
(East-West Pipeline) Abu Dhabi
Crude Oil Pipeline Total
Owner Iraq Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates
2011 (average)
Capacity 0.4 3.0 0.0 3.4
Throughput 0.4 2.0 0.0 2.4
Unused Capacity 2 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0
2012 (mid-year) 3
Capacity 0.4 4.8 1.5 6.7
Throughput 4 0.4 2.0 0.0 2.4
Unused Capacity 0.0 2.8 1.5 4.3
Notes: All estimates are as of August 17, 2012 and expressed in million barrels per day (bbl/d).
1Although the Kirkuk-Ceyhan Pipeline has a nominal nameplate capacity of 1.6 million bbl/d, its effective capacity is 0.4 million bbl/d because it cannot transport additional volumes of oil until the Strategic Pipeline to which it links can be repaired to bring in additional volumes of oil from the south of Iraq.
2"Unused Capacity" is defined as pipeline capacity that is not currenlty utlized and can be readily available.
3All estimates for 2012 are rates around the mid-year point; not the forecast average for 2012. 4The 2012 throughput rates are based off of 2011 estimates.
Source: EIA

U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom