What's new

India embarrassed over Dawood Ibrahim

.
Point me to that comment.

This my post

QDi.135 Name: 1: DAWOOD 2: IBRAHIM 3: KASKAR 4: na Title: Sheikh Designation: na DOB: 26 Dec. 1955 POB: Kher, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India Good quality a.k.a.: a) Dawood Ebrahim b) Sheikh Dawood Hassan c) Abdul Hamid Abdul Aziz d) Anis Ibrahim e) Aziz Dilip f) Daud Hasan Shaikh Ibrahim Kaskar g) Daud Ibrahim Memon Kaskar h) Dawood Hasan Ibrahim Kaskar i) Dawood Ibrahim Memon j) Dawood Sabri k) Kaskar Dawood Hasan l) Shaikh Mohd Ismail Abdul Rehman m) Dowood Hassan Shaikh Ibrahim n) Dawood Bhai Low quality a.k.a.: a) Ibrahim Shaikh Mohd Anis b) Shaikh Ismail Abdul c) Hizrat d) Sheikh Farooqi e) Bada Seth f) Bada Bhai g) Iqbal Bhai h) Mucchad i) Haji Sahab Nationality: Indian Passport no: a) Indian number A-333602, issued on 4 Jun. 1985, issued in Bombay, India (passport subsequently revoked by the Government of India) b) Indian number M110522, issued on 13 Nov. 1978, issued in Bombay c) Indian number R841697, issued on 26 Nov. 1981, issued in Bombay d) Indian number F823692 (JEDDAH) issued by CGI in Jeddah, issued on 2 Sep. 1989 e) Indian number A501801 (BOMBAY), issued on 26 Jul. 1985 f) Indian number K560098 (BOMBAY), issued on 30 Jul. 1975 g) Passport number V57865 (BOMBAY), issued on 3 Oct. 1983 h) Passport number P537849 (BOMBAY), issued on 30 Jul. 1979 i) Passport number A717288 (MISUSE), issued on 18 Aug. 1985, issued in Dubai j) Pakistani number G866537 (MISUSE), issued on 12 Aug. 1991, issued in Rawalpindi k) Passport number C-267185 ( issued in Karachi in Jul.1996) l) Passport number H-123259 ( issued in Rawalpindi in Jul. 2001) m) Passport number G-869537 ( issued in Rawalpindi) n) Passport number KC-285901 National identification no: na Address: a) Karachi, Pakistan ( White House, Near Saudi Mosque, Clifton) b) House Nu 37 - 30th Street - defence, Housing Authority, Karachi, Pakistan c) (Palatial bungalow in the hilly area of Noorabad in Karachi) Listed on: 3 Nov. 2003 (amended on 21 Mar. 2006, 25 Jul. 2006, 2 Jul. 2007, 11 Mar. 2010, 22 Aug. 2016) Other information: Father’s name is Sheikh Ibrahim Ali Kaskar, mother’s name is Amina Bi, wife’s name is Mehjabeen Shaikh. International arrest warrant issued by the Government of India. Review pursuant to Security Council resolution 1822 (2008) was concluded on 20 May 2010

https://www.un.org/sc/suborg/sites/www.un.org.sc.suborg/files/consolidated.pdf

Now who is the lairs ?

and who should be shamed ?

and i got reply like this

That only shows 3 addresses, which means it's not even the 6 that India claims.

AGAIN, the UN hasn't actually accepted anything yet. This is nothing more than a precautionary measure, and the UN WILL investigate it.

"the spokesperson said the information provided to the committee by India was proved to be false and motivated by the Indian aim to malign Pakistan and undermine its exemplary efforts to curb terrorism"

Where does Pakistan media quote about 3 addresses listed in UN document ? instead says India was embarrassed over Dawood Ibrahim and India's act was motivated, is it a fact ?

and this member not even reading previous posts says

Once again proved that Indian govt. and their media are biggest lairs.....and its their strategy that speak a lie so many times that people start believing it is true.

Whereas, it is Pakistan media doing selective news reporting to please its masters.
 
.
This my post



and i got reply like this



"the spokesperson said the information provided to the committee by India was proved to be false and motivated by the Indian aim to malign Pakistan and undermine its exemplary efforts to curb terrorism"

Where does Pakistan media quote about 3 addresses listed in UN document ? instead says India was embarrassed over Dawood Ibrahim and India's act was motivated, is it a fact ?

and this member not even reading previous posts says



Whereas, it is Pakistan media doing selective news reporting to please its masters.
My comment was factually correct. India claimed 9, 3 turned out to be false, and only 3 seem to have made it on the list, which mean it isn't even the 6 you and Indian media claim.

I stand by my judgement.
 
.

The very fact Pakistan was created keeping the Soviet in mind. I think you forget America & Britain was a strong ally of Pakistan & hated the fact the Soviet was closer to India. Do you even know history

America had an air base in Pakistan to spy over Russia & were worried of ReUnification of Pakistan with India, So they showered Jinnah & the politicians with everything they fancied for. Over the years the India's closeness with Soviet made them even more concerned of Russia influencing & pushing India to unify so Americans don't play their politics.

The Bangla war uprising is also conspired to be Russian work inside East Pakistan. And India was sucked in for separating East Pakistan due to the chaos of refugees. The Americans had a hint of the game & didn't want war. So this tapes are just before the war on Indira's visit to US to meet Nixon.

The bold confrontation & the undeterred firm words of Indira, we are going to war & not willing to budge was the reason of irritation for Nixon.

And the comments were not even official, that was said in a meeting which was leaked much later. The remarks by Nixon and Kissinger, was captured by a taping system which Nixon himself had secretly installed in the Oval office to record all his meetings which got leaked. So it's not a message given in front of the press. So the words used there is similar to how we use swear words against someone when we are angry.

But the words used against Pakistan is real, since that's the real image of Pakistan what many people have. I can give endless links for this. That's reason many Pakistanis say they are Indians in many countries, just to avoid the humiliation.

Newspapers need such news to get mileage. So leaked inside scene was printed as headlines. They have later apologized for this leaked words to India & Gandhis.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/jul/02/india.randeepramesh2

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4640773.stm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/01/AR2005070101930.html

Kissinger has said

"I regret that these words were used. I have extremely high regard for Mrs Gandhi as a statesman," he said.

"The fact that we were at cross purposes at that time was inherent in the situation but she was a great leader who did great things for her country."

One key conversation transcript comes from the meeting between President Nixon and Mr Kissinger in the White House on 5 November 1971, shortly after a meeting with the visiting Indira Gandhi.

"This was not a formal conversation. This was somebody letting off steam at the end of a meeting in which both President Nixon and I were emphasizing that we had gone out of our way to treat Mrs. Gandhi very cordially," Kissinger, 82, said in the interview. "There was disappointment at the results of the meeting. So Nixon used the words in frustration.
 
.
The very fact Pakistan was created keeping the Soviet in mind. I think you forget America & Britain was a strong ally of Pakistan & hated the fact the Soviet was closer to India. Do you even know history

Pakistan joined US camp after gaining independence. No one knew which camp Pakistan was willing to join. We received invitations with Russia and US both. We opted for US. Your post imply that US and Britain gave us freedom (highly objectionable) because they already knew Pakistan will join western camp; hence created Pakistan to stop Soviet advance? R U Smoking?

But the words used against Pakistan is real, since that's the real image of Pakistan what many people have. I can give endless links for this. That's reason many Pakistanis say they are Indians in many countries, just to avoid the humiliation.

Please tell me which Pakistani say they are Indians? It is Indian propaganda, nothing else. We are proud of our heritage and identity and not known as rapists around the world...Our capital is not known as rape capital around the world...

Reality check for you....If this indian would have said that he is Pakistani, he might have got an admission in university...

http://sputniknews.com/asia/20150309/1019275590.html
 
.
My comment was factually correct. India claimed 9, 3 turned out to be false, and only 3 seem to have made it on the list, which mean it isn't even the 6 you and Indian media claim.

I stand by my judgement.

Yes, I know you will stick with you judgment. but still i should put my perspective also,

1. Thread was started by a Pakistan member on the basis of a Pakistan Newspaper with an intention of shaming India.
2. It is Pakistan Newspaper and not Indian Newspaper and where are the claims of embarrassment to India has been made.
3. Everyone is jumping-in, into the process of shaming India on the basis of that news. which is not correct.
4. Isn't what you have told is the fact ? isn't 3 address made it to the list ? where are those sentence in Pakistan news ?

What I am claiming is that newspaper is biased and it is only showing news which someone dictating and primary job of the person is to deny everything which points fingers towards Pakistan even if it damages its credibility.

bye
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom