perplexed
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 1,817
- Reaction score
- 0
Hey bro, chill down. While I too share your indignation of such frivolous news headlines; a little analysis is warranted.
1. Firstly, Rustom 2 is not a follow up to Rustom 1. Both of them are independant projects which will run simeltaneously for some time. (though R 1 will act as a tech feeder to R 2 ).
So, don't worry about the non completion of R 1.
Also, the DRDO dude compared the two drones in terms of capability and the amount of payload . And believe it or not he is right. The real test lies in acquisition of targets and protection of the drones, we lag behind the yanks by miles!
2. The predator has already evolved into reaper and even phantom ray et al; but we are not trying to compete with the US, are we? For us, a simple predator would be awesome!
3. On this we agree. AFAIK, DRDO did something like this only with the ABM launch!
1. Don't worry dude. A 20 km version of Helina is already being studied for UCAV use (as per Aero India seminar). And in the meanwhile something like brimstone can be easily used for this purpose.
2. Not expected from a responsible poster like you bro! I suggest you do some reading bout the UAVs.
UAV Collision Avoidance DSA Detect See and Avoid
1. I stand corrected on rustom 2/rustom H
2. I accept I just went over the top but sometimes these kind of frivolous news pisses you off... I mean drdo officials coming out in press with one project after another with very few seeing the end of the road should be put an end to. Its like a bunch of high school tech freaks brainstorming in public and just showing their creative skills. What we want is time bound approach with upward risk of $$ requirements... nothing more nothing less !!