What's new

India, China must have strategic partnership: expert

chanikya

BANNED
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
618
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
Beijing, Jan 19 (IANS) The border row between India and China “is moving towards an agreed framework” and the two countries need to develop strategic ties, a visiting Indian professor has said.
“The boundary issue is moving towards an agreed framework, and the two countries must now develop a strategic partnership to realize the Asian century,” Mukul Sanwal said in a commentary in China Daily.
A former Indian government official, Sanwal described India and China as competitors and said their difficulties in achieving long-term cooperation reflected lingering attitudes rather than conflicting strategic goals.
“In the emerging multi-polar world, major powers will have to come to some sort of accommodation with each other, shaped by three strategic shifts,” wrote Sanwal, a visiting professor at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing.
First, a significant shift of power was taking place from the US to Asia as the driver of global politics. Second, India’s growth was different from China’s. Third, New Delhi and Beijing were now cooperating on major global issues.
He said the US was encouraging India to join it in securing a military balance of power in Asia. “But any such treaty or understanding would be implicitly against China.”
Sanwal said the policy issue before India was: will it work with China to decisively shape the future of Asia and become a major participant in world politics, or, will it partner with the US to contain China, so that it can become a regional power?
China, he pointed out, was now India’s biggest trading partner.
Trade and business ties between China and India have soared from some $5 billion in 2002 to more than $60 billion in 2010, and the aim was to boost trade over the next five years to $100 billion annually.
While India’s workforce would increase by 110 million over the next decade, China’s would rise by less than 20 million. This could push India’s growth rate ahead of China’s.
“The drivers of competition between the two countries will therefore be shaped by water and energy rather than by efforts to expand trade.
“The perspective that energy is a zero-sum game is a Western construct, as they are profligate users of energy and see it as an integral part of their way of life.”
He added: “Both India and China want to secure their energy supplies, and since the oil supplies for both cross the Indian Ocean, the answer lies in developing a joint strategic doctrine for this zone.”
Sanwal said India and China were coordinating their actions on climate change and trade negotiations, the restructuring of global economic institutions and opposition to military interventions.
“The foreign policy challenge for both countries is to work together to build networks of institutions and relationships that will support a new global order.”

India, China must have strategic partnership: expert News
 
. .
How this difference is supposed to resolve ???Without either side budging on their claim.
And what about Aksai Chin ??
Peace on the line of 1959 ???Will this be the way forward for ensuring this century belongs to Asia ??

Many queries still to be addressed before attaining long lasting peace in the region.

Converting current LAC to IB.. India giving up clain on Aksai Chin & China giving up claim on Tawang..

Strategically China wanted keep the Tawang (South Tibet) issue alive for Nehru hosting the Tibetan Govt in excile. Other-wise, it does not serve them any other purpose. On the other hand, Aksai Chin is of far more importance to them..

Similarly, We have patriotic people living in Tawang, while Aksai Chin is just some baren land.

So it makes sense to both the parties.

Only thorn here is the Tibetan govt in excile residing in India. DL, as a religious leader would have been fine, but as a head of the exiled Tibetan Govt, will never go well with China. Just for a moment think how India would have reacted if China had hosted the Kashmir govt in exile, or Assam govt in exile.. It's the same thing..
 
.
Converting current LAC to IB.. India giving up clain on Aksai Chin & China giving up claim on Tawang..

Strategically China wanted keep the Tawang (South Tibet) issue alive for Nehru hosting the Tibetan Govt in excile. Other-wise, it does not serve them any other purpose. On the other hand, Aksai Chin is of far more importance to them..

Similarly, We have patriotic people living in Tawang, while Aksai Chin is just some baren land.

So it makes sense to both the parties.

Only thorn here is the Tibetan govt in excile residing in India. DL, as a religious leader would have been fine, but as a head of the exiled Tibetan Govt, will never go well with China. Just for a moment think how India would have reacted if China had hosted the Kashmir govt in exile, or Assam govt in exile.. It's the same thing..

Good point!

And even on land mass AP is much more bigger then Aksai chin in terms of size.
 
.
Good point!

And even on land mass AP is much more bigger then Aksai chin in terms of size.

Correction.. China does not lay claim to entire Arunachal.. Just Tawang district & few adjoining areas.. That's the area with majority (almost 99%) Monpa people (follower of Buddhism) live along with some Tibetan refusees..
 
.
Correction.. China does not lay claim to entire Arunachal.. Just Tawang district & few adjoining areas.. That's the area with majority (almost 99%) Monpa people (follower of Buddhism) live along with some Tibetan refusees..

Then why whole AP is shown as disputed on google earth if what you say is true?

Arunachal Pradesh (Hindi: अरुणाचल प्रदेश, pronounced [ərʊˈɳaːtɕəl prəˈd̪eːɕ] ( listen)) is a state of India, located in the far northeast. It borders the states of Assam and Nagaland to the south, and shares international borders with Burma in the east, Bhutan in the west, and the People's Republic of China in the north. The majority of the territory is claimed by the People's Republic of China as part of South Tibet.

Arunachal Pradesh - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Then why whole AP is shown as disputed on google earth if what you say is true?

You're right. Almost all of Arunachal is being included in China's claim..

busindiachinafactormap_750.ashx
 
. . .
I don't think the boundary issue is such a big deal if both want to sought it out, but I do see a big problem with the Tibetan govt in exile,India is in a place neither can we swallow them nor can you spit them. ( no offence to any of the Tibetan people in India)
 
. .
Actual conflicts in China and India is not very sharp, with China's economic development and industrial upgrading, economic relations will be more as complementary rather than competing. It was good, the Indians concerned about China, when we were poor, we even concerned about Thailand, but do not be fooled by your paranoid, we can have more than some paranoid thoughts coming and I said, what the West to India will be less and less, while China and other emerging countries will have more more help in the present and future.

This seems a little something new for both sides, can only look forward to it.
 
.
I don't think the boundary issue is such a big deal if both want to sought it out, but I do see a big problem with the Tibetan govt in exile,India is in a place neither can we swallow them nor can you spit them. ( no offence to any of the Tibetan people in India)

You may underestimate the significance of the Tibetan exiles, as long as we do not solve this problem, China has reason to doubt that India is still in the spy Tibet, then, any solution will have no meaning, all our relations will be stagnant, if the two sides continued to increase distrust and even the outbreak of a mine in the future.
 
.
You may underestimate the significance of the Tibetan exiles, as long as we do not solve this problem, China has reason to doubt that India is still in the spy Tibet, then, any solution will have no meaning, all our relations will be stagnant, if the two sides continued to increase distrust and even the outbreak of a mine in the future.

We understand that the Tibetan govt is something that will have to be taken care about but what about the issues that concern us that you are involved neck deep?
 
.
We understand that the Tibetan govt is something that will have to be taken care about but what about the issues that concern us that you are involved neck deep?

Tibet, it is always a core interests, if a big neighbor always maintained ambitions for it, this is a deep, this is a mine of our major core interests, we always have to solve it, no matter what the method.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom