India-China Border Face-Off Worsens As Delhi Welcomes Chinese President Xi

[Sardar Singh]

If that has to be the case hopefully India's neighbors and internal opposition will get stronger, as the gap between India and China continues to grow. China should arm NE freedom fighters.

If India leaves the land of Sino-Tibetans, Burmese and Mon then there will be no problems.

yada yada yada,talks are cheap you also knows it(i guess not).so save those empty threat for the future caus we surely don't give a damn,when the times come we will show the world what we are made of,till then keep amusing your cheerleaders.

 

[Tractor]

When China and India can find a fair solution for border disputes, everything will become good. That does need wisdom and both two party have to compromise to each other in some areas. I think the major obstacles comes from domestic nationlism. I believe eventually the problem can be solved. China has sucessfully solved land border disputes with many countries, such as Russia, Kyrgyzstan and even Vietnam. Whatever land border problems are much easier to solve comparing to sea/iland disputes.

And I wish Pakistan and India can close their conflicts and set up a completely new, healthy relationship. SOC may provide a platform for two countries to contact and cooperate. It'll be a good start if both of them join the SOC. If so Asia can become more powerful and stand in a equal position when facing western alliance, such as NATO, FVEY.

I can not understand why you say land border problems are much easier to solve comparing to sea/iland disputes while I think the contrary.What's your logic?

 

[TheTruth]

yada yada yada,talks are cheap you also knows it(i guess not).so save those empty threat for the future caus we surely don't give a damn,when the times come we will show the world what we are made of,till then keep amusing your cheerleaders.

A Singh also illegally annexed Ladakh, an independent kingdom. Isn't this a bit hypocritical?

 

[Sardar Singh]

A Singh also illegally annexed Ladakh, an independent kingdom. Isn't this a bit hypocritical?

whatever

 

[S. Martin]

I can not understand why you say land border problems are much easier to solve comparing to sea/iland disputes while I think the contrary.What's your logic?

Because land sovereignty is more easier to identify its sovereignty by tracing its inhabitancy history or maps or human activities proofs, as most lands are easy to reach by human comparing with sea or islands. Many sea area and small islands are far beyond human activities furthermore less evidences can be left, so it's more difficult to find evidences to prove its sovereignty. Just like south Chinese sea, although many countries claim he own some islands however he cann't provide convincing evidences from history perspective. It's just my personal opinion, maybe it's not correct. Why do you think the contrary?

 

[Tractor]

Because land sovereignty is more easier to identify its sovereignty by tracing its inhabitancy history or maps or human activities proofs, as most lands are easy to reach by human comparing with sea or islands. Many sea area and small islands are far beyond human activities furthermore less evidences can be left, so it's more difficult to find evidences to prove its sovereignty. Just like south Chinese sea, although many countries claim he own some islands however he cann't provide convincing evidences from history perspective. It's just my personal opinion, maybe it's not correct. Why do you think the contrary?

So I get it,it's about evidances.But issues easy or difficult to solve is another matter because sovereignty is core interest proved by nation's power.
As I know Chinese are used to deal with something easy to handle instead of the ones more difficult ,that in Chinese避重就轻.