What's new

India border security forces killed another bangladeshi

.
I guess you are correct there.
Shooting should be a last resort, though.
If they are unarmed, they can't be hostile.
They're on foot, so it will be easier to catch them.

No country will kill ppl for crossing the border inadvertently. As, that would result in a similar response from the other side.
 
.
Exactly Nihonji, Sometimes i really ask myself which type of democracy India is. sometimes it seems to give a bad name to democracy.
I cant imagine the uproar there will have been if that had happened in my country, U.S or any other developed country. The government would have resigned due to the public backlash/uproar im sure about this. Human beings life are valuable and are to be cherished, they are not animals for GODS sake. Afterall, this was just an illegal immigrant seeking for a little better life(not like India is an eldorado per say with all due respect). So should this means you have to kill him and justify it? What type of democracy do you live in? Seems even their northern communist authoritarian neighbour is better than India.:disagree: I expected better from India to be honest. If thats the way people think in India like he does, then i can understand why all their little neighbours in south Asia despise them.:disagree::angry:

It is deplorable, definitely. These are for goodness sakes, human lives, not something that is replaceable like cattle, chickens or what not. I had never really read into Indian-Border policies before, in fact this is the first time for me reading any such thing in this forum. And I find it disgusting that some posters can just laugh about this as if its some sick disgusting joke.

I mean, can you imagine if something like this happened in Europe or in US/Canada ? The ACLU and NAACP and other civil rights groups would be out there to the site on a moment's notice.

I can only imagine if the Japanese border security were to do something like this to our neighbors. I mean, come on, we're still even getting criticized for the atrocities committed some 70 years ago. We'd never hear the end of it from the Chinese, or Koreans. :disagree:
 
Last edited:
. . .
The source itself is BSF officials, how credible is that?
Which other source you expect to be more credible? The Indian and Bangladeshi cattle trader's account who are nothing but grade one criminals? Or do you suggest that we should record video footage before BSF shoots those smugglers? :lol:
 
. . . .
What makes you believe that BSF has to shoot smugglers in front of locales to prove themselves correct?

@scorpionx , may I ask why cattle trading looked so unfavorably in the region? Thanks.
India has approximately 280 Million cows but being a Hindu majority nation, eating beef is allowed in some handful of states. On the contrary, Bangladesh being a Muslim majority agricultural country suffers from intense shortage of cattle. According to a report, half of its beef consumed comes from India. It's a very profitable business for both the Indian suppliers and the Bangladeshi middle agents who makes a hell good money from these deals. .
 
Last edited:
.
that's a difference between India solider and Pakistan solider ...

Indian solider shoot down human life ...
but when Indian solider by mistake came to Pakistan area few weeks before... we had taken him out from water and gave him a proper respect , time and as much we were can,,, we sent him back to india respectfully ....

Pakistan army ... m proud of You ...
 
.
What makes you believe that BSF has to shoot smugglers in front of locales to prove themselves correct?

I said the source could be a locale for the statement on the murder of the officer. BSF is already under stiff criticism on the border killing issue, there is no reason to believe they wouldn't lie to hide out their misdoings.
 
.
What makes you believe that BSF has to shoot smugglers in front of locales to prove themselves correct?


India has approximately 280 Million cows but being a Hindu majority nation, eating beef is allowed in some handful of states. On the contrary, Bangladesh being a Muslim majority agricultural country suffers from the shortage of cattle. According to a report, half of its beef consumed comes from India. It's a very profitable business for both the Indian suppliers and the Bangladeshi middle agents who makes a hell good money from these deals. .

Thanks for the answer, @scorpionx . Well, that, indeed, makes sense. Perhaps there should be development of a formal cattle trading by Indian enterprises. This may prove opportune because : 1) it ensures that sales of cattle don't change quantitatively and 2) it reduces instances of illegal border activities. This, overall, will benefit India because it will reduce unnecessary friction between India and Bangladesh. India, as the pre-eminent power in South Asia, may do well to build and forge friendlier ties with her neighbors. I believe there are win-win scenarios for both India and Bangladesh.

I do wish the best and continued prosperity for Bangladesh and India in this regard. Both your peoples and civilizations are brothers, there are cultural , ethnic and racial affinities here.

Its like a family dynamic, man. A younger brother will look up to an older , bigger brother if that bigger brother is kind, understanding of the views of the little brother. But if the older brother is mentally and physically abusive, it will destroy the family dynamic and the younger brother will view the older brother as --- an existential threat. There is no need for this.

Let India be the kind, strong , benevolent bigger brother.
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom