What's new

India bans 43 more Chinese apps in latest salvo at Beijing

Patriot786b2

BANNED
Joined
Apr 14, 2019
Messages
615
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Canada
India bans 43 more Chinese apps in latest salvo at Beijing.
This action is super sign of weakness from India mercy of propaganda censorship merely.



India banned 43 more Chinese apps on Tuesday including some from e-commerce giant Alibaba, saying they threatened its "sovereignty and integrity" as tensions remain high between the nuclear-armed neighbours following a deadly border clash.

New Delhi previously pulled 59 Chinese apps — including the wildly popular video-sharing platform TikTok — from its huge domestic market, weeks after the high-altitude battle in the Ladakh region in June when 20 Indian soldiers were killed.

A further 118 Chinese mobile applications, including the hit shoot ’em up game PUBG, were banned in September.

The latest tranche of banned apps include Alibaba’s AliExpress, delivery service Lalamove as well as dating and live-streaming apps.

Alibaba’s investments in the booming online market in the nation of 1.3 billion people include digital payments platform Paytm and online grocer BigBasket.

Anti-China sentiment has soared in India since the clash and sparked calls for a boycott of goods from the neighbouring country.

India’s imports from China, which include toys, cosmetics, home appliances, auto components and steel, totalled US$74.9 billion last year, according to New Delhi.

Source
 
.
India bans 43 more Chinese apps in latest salvo at Beijing.
This action is super sign of weakness from India mercy of propaganda censorship merely.
Source
Mighty Modi ji ka Mashtar Shtroke.

Chinese killing Indians and taking indian land and Indians responding with app bans.

Wah Modi ji Wah
 
.
Mighty Modi ji ka Mashtar Shtroke.

Chinese killing Indians and taking indian land and Indians responding with app bans.

Wah Modi ji Wah
Better for us in the long term, plus China also faced heavy casualties which they never accepted nor their CCP ever will.

It is better for us that our indigenous platforms will rise and our data won’t be stolen.
 
.
A country heavily dependent on censorship to media propaganda will not survive in next 10 years of facts on the ground.
 
. .
Better for us in the long term, plus China also faced heavy casualties which they never accepted nor their CCP ever will.

It is better for us that our indigenous platforms will rise and our data won’t be stolen.

everyone is hiding stuff right??? only fake news factory is telling the truth.

agree with indigenous stuff comment, can not say india is not trying, but quality is another story, when Indian has to buy everything foreign for its defence.
 
.
everyone is hiding stuff right??? only fake news factory is telling the truth.

agree with indigenous stuff comment, can not say india is not trying, but quality is another story, when Indian has to buy everything foreign for its defence.
See Chinese Global Times editor accepted on Twitter openly that China faced casualties but he added that China won’t release the figures of the same so as to “prevent escalation of conflict if people on both sides start comparing casualties”. That tweet is still available.
 

Attachments

  • 1606334398386.jpeg
    1606334398386.jpeg
    56.7 KB · Views: 19
.
Better for us in the long term, plus China also faced heavy casualties which they never accepted nor their CCP ever will.

It is better for us that our indigenous platforms will rise and our data won’t be stolen.

See Chinese Global Times editor accepted on Twitter openly that China faced casualties but he added that China won’t release the figures of the same so as to “prevent escalation of conflict if people on both sides start comparing casualties”. That tweet is still available.

Which part of it implies that the casualties were "heavy"?
 
.
Which part of it implies that the casualties were "heavy"?
Our soldiers had visual confirmation as they fought there, it is stupid to say that Chinese killed Indian soldiers but returned unharmed. At the end they hid it, means something was too high to reveal.
 
.
it is stupid to say that Chinese killed Indian soldiers but returned

Never implied that

At the end they hid it, means something was too high to reveal.

Not necessarily, going with the flow of what the editor is saying then remember Pulwama and the reaction of the public and what followed onwards due to the pressure, assuming the casualties were low on Chinese side it would still be a better idea to hide them and let the Indians assume what they want so as to deescalate the situation
 
.
Never implied that



Not necessarily, going with the flow of what the editor is saying then remember Pulwama and the reaction of the public and what followed onwards due to the pressure, assuming the casualties were low on Chinese side it would still be a better idea to hide them and let the Indians assume what they want so as to deescalate the situation
De-escalation is in the hands of China, not us. During Pulwama we lost 44 Soldiers and we revealed all of our casualties but China didn’t reveal it. They neither gave them a public military honour or accepted them, India did both.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom