There were things that happened prior to Mukti Bahini.
That did not apply for the princely states. Mental gymnastics done.
retard gymnastics incoming.
If you read what i said after that, I said it didn't apply to princely states.
Thus Hyderabad and Junagar, but your very admittance should go to Pakistan.
India did not Invade. it was Pakistani forces that Invaded Kashmir.
We pitched in only at the end after the request was made from then Maharaja of Kashmir.
other points are more or less correct.
Also, Kashmir problem will never solve. but, there is a good possibility that Asia will become Nuclear field on this issue.
India invaded after Pakistani forces, no one denies this.
The problem is what business did India have in getting involved?
If your point is that "India did not invade, so it's the good guy"
Then by that very logic, India DID invade Hyderabad, Junagar , Goa and many many other places.
Thus making India the bad guy on a much larger scale.
This is what our forefathers warned us about when they said 'incomplete knowledge is dangerous'.
1. True, as it should have been, but there was no agreement.
2. Neither was it feasible for any princely state to stay independent.
3. If you wanna compare Kashmir to Junagarh, I suggest you look at timeline. It was in September that Pakistan actually accepted the accession of Junagarh. Kashmir war started in Oct end.
The main reason for this was to use it as a bargaining chip for J&K. Even after this, India didn't sent military to Junagarh, but to its vassal states and Nawab had threatened them against joining India, which they wanted to do. Nawab didn't meet VP Menon, who went there to discuss issue and when things deteriorated with the locals, he fled to Pakistan. Soon after a plebiscite was held and 91% locals chose India.
4. India did not invade Kashmir, infact, even before Sheikh came to power, India maintained diplomatic relations with the state and friendly relations with Sheikh. Even supported freedom. But it was Pak's acceptance of Junagarh and Travancore's request for accession that made Patel change his mind, as you yourself say that Patel at the start was against taking kashmir forcefully.
5. It was the tribals (whether with or without support of Pak state and military, although it does seem surprising that they would get modern weapons, have knowledge of military tactics without state support) who invaded kashmir and that's when Maharaja asked for India's assistance in protecting the land from the invasion for which India laid down the condition for accession.
Blaming the mess in Kashmir entirely on India saying 'its coz India INVADED' is incorrect. Im not saying India hasn't been at fault in kashmir, but India certainly didn't start the mess.
True, complete knowledge that India indoctrinates it's people with has brought us to the brink of Nuclear war.
I am sorry, I didn't really read what you wrote as it is the same nonsense I have already addressed.
Non of you Indians ever want to address the question of what the Kashmiri democratic aspirations are.
Kashmir is for Kashmiris and they have a democratic and human right to self determination.
You know for a fact that they will choose Pakistan or independence over you, so you people do mental gymnastic to justify your genocidal regime.
That is really it. End of story.
