I don't see how it is different from what you are doing? I am betting on the future whereas you against it.
Well don't underestimate the future, to you the military hospital transfer doesn't look like much now but as I said these things take time and have a habit of creeping up on you. A presence is a presence albeit a controlled one.
It is possible that it is so being proclaimed in the media so as to avoid offending China and Pakistan.
For all we know it bringing fighters in the guise of anti-terrorist activities is doing a dual purpose of using the base as a strategic outpost.
However if we talk short term it is there to acquire strategic significance post 2014.
And you are wrong, have you heard of the Manas air base leased from Kyrgyzstan by USA?
I know it'll be worse, but unlike you I am not denying it however worse it may seem to me.
As for
There's much more than that in those articles, albeit some of it is sensationalist journalism.
Those posts were originally my response to you saying that encircling is not possible.
True if you just look at Tajikistan or Afghanistan there's not much point to it, however if you put it all together like in those articles and I being honest here, it does seem like India is more or less trying to encircle Pak and there is practically no scope of denying it.
IMHO dude, I've been showing you articles as much as I can be it Indian, Pakistani or even French and you have been denying each and everyone of them and it is simply not fair when you say that "you are posting just because they suit you" when in fact you are denying them coz they don't suit you.
A source can be credible up to a certain limit it is only up to you believe it.
True, which is why I admitted it you on the other hand have to degrade its existence to prove your point, that does not seem to me like "share my views".
Oh you are right Countries should not become hypocrites and say that Pakistan is destabilizing Central Asia, but if they do become hypocrites(which they are), they'll probably say, regardless of the interests of different nations none of the interests has hurt the region as much as Pakistan's.
As for incursions.
We all know how its going to end, diplomatic rattling, ranting in the media, visiting each others' countries, doing the fake Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai and wella things are back to normal.
As for "trade changes nothing between two hostiles",
not unless the hostiles are China and India we all know China won't do anything stupid at the advent of whatever is going on, it has too much on steak with USA breathing down its neck and the ongoing border wars it is having with everyone else, just like India.
China says it
Salman Khurshid to visit China on May 9 despite standoff - The Times of India
AS I SAID........
Ask yourself why Russia is warming up to Pakistan? You'll then get the answer why Russia is warming up with the CIS too, and that btw has been happening before Russia came to Pak.
Unlike the Americans they don't need to put out units(if they ever have to) from Pakistan and as for negotiations with Taliban how many times has it ever succeeded with or without Pakistani assistance, Russia needs only a part of Pakistani cooperations they are not dependent on you?
As you said geopolitics of that region is messy, Russia only seeks control of the region it is not directly threatened by it. So if they ever prioritize what they want; a dysfunctional region or a BRIC nation by their side the answer won't seem difficult. Which is why I rule out future Russian weapons sale to Islamabad.
Correction: India remains number 1 if it means buying military stuff from Russia.
Yes you are right we do need Russia, however Russia still needs India more than it needs Pakistan, so yes we can dictate terms.
Yes it does matter, it matters coz we know Russia won't sell you arms anytime soon, it matters coz Russia won't sell Pak weapons coz itself doesn't trust such a fluctuating state, it matters coz we know we hold some diplomatic power.
As I said there is something known as market power, so we are not that influential.
If you don't get sarcasm its not my problem either, or maybe you thought it was irony which indirectly proves me right.
BTW analogy doesn't mean similarity.
Well I am just hopeful, that it will change a rapidly declining Afghanistan as it profits no one.
As I will repeat myself "its a new set of plans, new infrastructure, new everything"
200 years????Dear don't underestimate the future, it remains to be seen how the so called "ground realities" hurt Indian interests as for now the tag of a soft power sticks to India and what we are set to gain from Afghanistan
IS happening, that's ground reality for us.
Yes if you are looking at it directly it did fail, but as I was implying it didn't do much to India, and our influence is still on the rise.
And Hamid Karzai be it a puppet or no he is still pro-Indian, and as for the negotiation with taliban we all know nothing is going to come out of it and we have much to offer Afghanistan
for them too reject us.
Correction $3 trillion mining contract I think is not nothing.
Personnel training if it is nothing then why recently did Pakistan want Afghanistan do send them in pakistan?
Yeah..........you might wanna check your facts, coz there's more in the "progress card" than you might think.
Apart from the billion dollar aid program, India has its hands dipped in literally all types of infrastructure from roads to the bronze-domed Afghan parliament building, from agriculture to schools and hospitals, field clinics, children's hospitals and midday-meals to about 2 million Afghan schoolchildren, scholarships, more opportunities for Afghans in India and so much more.
We are not just building their economy we are building their society.
And possible sale of military equipment to Afghanistan.
As for what the Afghans think of India.
Yup it seems Iran won't be hostile to Pak but as I said our possible western front will be Afghanistan not Iran.
flame baits??????????
Dude is it not obvious that we have been flaming each other for a few days now?
I just nutted up and said it directly.
A destabilized Afghanistan is directly harmful to Pakistan maybe not that instant but still harmful, if you are denying that then God help you.
Who am I to say?
I am the patient onlooker that sees the hypocrisy of it all, as I know there won't be any progress to the cancer known as Taliban until Pakistan itself is dealt with, and as such I can say whatever I want even though no one will heed me.
Yes my friend you are betting on the future or as you call it counting your chickens. However be it Pakistan or Afghanistan or America, it seems all that backlash is yet catch upto India and it is yet to be seen how the failure of Afghanistan if ever will affect India coz till now I don't see none.
"do not have a habit of understanding statements in the right context"...............?????
In which age are you living buddy?
You can't expect a country to attack with everything they have got like in the dark ages.
Its the 21st century where asymmetric warfare and economic warfare are the norm.
I understand your compulsion of stating that no one will attack you coz you have nukes which is again stated by so many a fanboys.
India too is a nuclear state or America too is a nuclear state but they won't attack you coz even after how bad Pakistan is dealt the damage the repercussions are just too high
Nukes in this day and age remains only as a buffer and you know that too.
So as I said if anyone has to attack Pakistan the only way is to use stealth.
And when (if), an Indo-Pak war comes about Pakistan will be concentrated too much on its eastern front rather than think about how to punish Afghanistan as we all know Pak is not plentiful with resources.
As for what use the Afghanistan front has?
Maybe special forces will use that front in certain scenarios for sabotage, direct action, unconventional warfare, counter proliferation et cetra, maybe RAW will use it to slowly destabilize Pak, maybe counter intel, maybe for SIGINT/ELINT/COMINT/RUMINT/CONJAM purposes I don't know there are so many possibilities. And if New Delhi is stretching its influence in Afghanistan then they must know more than you or me, unless of course you can entertain us with your theories.
So you are saying that every pro Indian news is exaggeration?
Your picture itself is wrong thus your point will remain moot,
as for,
that too is wrong as I again proved that the station is 2km not 200m from the shore so it is
NOT the same area.
And as I said the picture is not updated which is why we can't see the station, and since your a bit too much in this argument then if your "common sense" would please provide proof like I have continuously have provided proof, that indeed the picture is updated.
Buddy you are the one denying the whole existence of the station, not every secret location is available in google, their are more American listening station than Indian in Oman, lets see if you can find those.
And as for,
You are being such a hypocrite man, you chose to believe an Indian article that bashes India and when a pro Indian article is posted you are all over it and you accuse me of believing what suits me? Weren't you the one who said that Indian media sensationalizes everything so why believe the article that depicts Indian failure so wholeheartedly? Isn't that an exaggeration too?
Buddy you shouldn't be even using the word " FACT " as your reason to deny the article are just assumptions.
So again.
The
FACT is that there
IS a listening station and all your reasons of denying are either hypothetical or your own personal assumptions.
But in the end you don't have a point as I said the station is 2km from the sea having police checkpoints, and since there is no reason for you to believe that the report is an exaggeration after all it is said so by a French based media not an Indian media which you believe are the most unreliable in the world, I'll assume you understood mt point.
You are completely missing the point here mate.
And as I said AES cannot be used in every radio module its functions is limited to large scale military communication, what about phones, what about ELINT which can be used to intercepting radar signals and learning their locations and operating procedures et cetra.
As I said SIGINT is not just limited to cryptography, AES is only a 1 part of the puzzle.
AES is a just a resistance method and all it uses is a very complicated sets of cipher systems.
A substitution permutation field where it repeats the cycles for every specific bit.
Their are some ways in cryptography which are beyond the control of the AES and might have broken it.
A Power analysis attack is when the hardware itself is monitored for surge or decline in power consumption to chart a graph so as to know by the means of oscilloscopes what type of side-channel to use.
Timing attack uses the behavioral characteristics whose data is dependent for the implementation of the said algorithm rather than the mathematical properties of the algorithm itself, and so on there are so many types of attacks which cannot be comprehended by the code itself.
As for "Any exploits are quickly taken care of by the experts",
what about techniques like the biclique technique?
It doesn't use the specific coding of the AES. As AES subkeys only have small differences between cycles your experts can't change that it is a characteristic function of every AES.
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/cryptanalysis/aesbc.pdf
There are hundreds of ways to attack and as proven by the cryptographer's adage,
"Attacks always get better, they never get worse."
As I proved, your picture itself is wrong so the point remains moot.
And the source seems credible enough to believe that the listening station
IS present.
And again I had proved that SIGINT equipment can be miniaturized which should solve all your problems.
Clear with me, my assumption your assumptions, issue dropped.
