What's new

India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert

kali

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert

A US arms control expert has made the astonishing claim that India may have been the mysterious fourth customer of Pakistan’s notorious nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, dubbed father of Islamabad’s nuclear bomb.Journalist Joshua Pollack, a US policy wonk who has done work on nuclear proliferation, makes the assertion of all places in Playboy that Khan “provided the shortcut to a nuclear weapon” to India besides Iran, Libya and North Korea.
The evidence he provides is pretty thin: “Only three countries are known to operate centrifuge technology similar to Pakistan’s. Two of them, Iran and North Korea, are already accounted for among Khan’s customers”.

“The third and last country on the list: India, Pakistan’s foe,” concludes Pollack, suggesting that it was “an overlooked possibility, previously ignored because it seemed too absurd to consider, but it might be the most compelling answer to the fourth-customer mystery”.

Although India, which conducted its first nuclear test May 18, 1974, “had beaten Pakistan to the bomb, they had done so through mastery of plutonium production – a different route to creating a nuclear weapon,” he said.

“India’s ability to enrich uranium remained limited. New Delhi started a centrifuge programme in the 1970s, but the Indians weren’t ready to break ground on their main enrichment facility until 1986.”

“By that point, Pakistan had been churning out weapons-grade uranium for at least three years,” Pollack claimed.

India’s enrichment programme progressed slowly, but at some point before 1992 the Indians began experimenting with supercritical centrifuges, devices that can withstand very high rotational speeds, he said.

Documents the Indians gave potential suppliers for centrifuge parts “provide strong clues about where New Delhi’s supercritical centrifuge technology came from,” Pollack said.

“Despite some changes, the design is recognisable to the trained eye: It almost mirrors the G-2 centrifuge, a design that Khan stole from URENCO in the 1970s and later reproduced as Pakistan’s P-2 centrifuge,” he said.

Centrifuge specs are not the only apparent link between India’s enrichment programme and Khan’s operation, Pollack claimed.

The cast of characters also overlaps, starting with Gerhard Wisser, a German living in South Africa, who also supplied India’s centrifuge programme with specialised equipment, starting in the late 1980s, he said.


India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert | idrw.org
 
But this is all lie huh?

But in the case of NK and other countries, whatever some hobojoe says, it is true!!!

---------- Post added at 12:47 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 AM ----------

Although I do think this is BS.
 
There is no end to conspiracy theory... Starting Lincoln's death to 9/11...everything is a conspiracy for Americans. And they are always true... Not to forget WMD in Iraq :hitwall:

Not necessary the technology bought directly from AQ Khan, maybe its sourced from another buyer. Its possible Iran might have passed or Russians could have given us or Urenco could have sold us under the table or Indians might have developed on their own.
 
amreeka mai chutiay bananay nahi partay bany banay mil jatay hain

---------- Post added at 01:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:57 AM ----------

BTW - Thread already posted
 
haha ------------ No comment .

Amerika , Amerika .................... Full of Chay's ...................hahaha
 
India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert

A US arms control expert has made the astonishing claim that India may have been the mysterious fourth customer of Pakistan’s notorious nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, dubbed father of Islamabad’s nuclear bomb.Journalist Joshua Pollack, a US policy wonk who has done work on nuclear proliferation, makes the assertion of all places in Playboy that Khan “provided the shortcut to a nuclear weapon” to India besides Iran, Libya and North Korea.
The evidence he provides is pretty thin: “Only three countries are known to operate centrifuge technology similar to Pakistan’s. Two of them, Iran and North Korea, are already accounted for among Khan’s customers”.

“The third and last country on the list: India, Pakistan’s foe,” concludes Pollack, suggesting that it was “an overlooked possibility, previously ignored because it seemed too absurd to consider, but it might be the most compelling answer to the fourth-customer mystery”.

Although India, which conducted its first nuclear test May 18, 1974, “had beaten Pakistan to the bomb, they had done so through mastery of plutonium production – a different route to creating a nuclear weapon,” he said.

“India’s ability to enrich uranium remained limited. New Delhi started a centrifuge programme in the 1970s, but the Indians weren’t ready to break ground on their main enrichment facility until 1986.”

“By that point, Pakistan had been churning out weapons-grade uranium for at least three years,” Pollack claimed.

India’s enrichment programme progressed slowly, but at some point before 1992 the Indians began experimenting with supercritical centrifuges, devices that can withstand very high rotational speeds, he said.

Documents the Indians gave potential suppliers for centrifuge parts “provide strong clues about where New Delhi’s supercritical centrifuge technology came from,” Pollack said.

“Despite some changes, the design is recognisable to the trained eye: It almost mirrors the G-2 centrifuge, a design that Khan stole from URENCO in the 1970s and later reproduced as Pakistan’s P-2 centrifuge,” he said.

Centrifuge specs are not the only apparent link between India’s enrichment programme and Khan’s operation, Pollack claimed.

The cast of characters also overlaps, starting with Gerhard Wisser, a German living in South Africa, who also supplied India’s centrifuge programme with specialised equipment, starting in the late 1980s, he said.


India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert | idrw.org



Notorious might be for u Non Pakistanis. For us he is a legend , Father of Nuclear Program and atomic bomb and thnx to Allah for blessing us with A Q khan . V r proud of him being Pakistani and v salute him.

And Nuclear sword and Pak Army are the only two who are keeping enemies of Pakistan at bay.

Long Live A Q Khan and Pakistan Army. :pakistan:
 
India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert

A US arms control expert has made the astonishing claim that India may have been the mysterious fourth customer of Pakistan’s notorious nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, dubbed father of Islamabad’s nuclear bomb.Journalist Joshua Pollack, a US policy wonk who has done work on nuclear proliferation, makes the assertion of all places in Playboy that Khan “provided the shortcut to a nuclear weapon” to India besides Iran, Libya and North Korea.
The evidence he provides is pretty thin: “Only three countries are known to operate centrifuge technology similar to Pakistan’s. Two of them, Iran and North Korea, are already accounted for among Khan’s customers”.

“The third and last country on the list: India, Pakistan’s foe,” concludes Pollack, suggesting that it was “an overlooked possibility, previously ignored because it seemed too absurd to consider, but it might be the most compelling answer to the fourth-customer mystery”.

Although India, which conducted its first nuclear test May 18, 1974, [“had beaten Pakistan to the bomb, they had done so through mastery of plutonium production – a different route to creating a nuclear weapon,” he said.

“India’s ability to enrich uranium remained limited. New Delhi started a centrifuge programme in the 1970s, but the Indians weren’t ready to break ground on their main enrichment facility until 1986.”

“By that point, Pakistan had been churning out weapons-grade uranium for at least three years,” Pollack claimed.

India’s enrichment programme progressed slowly, but at some point before 1992 the Indians began experimenting with supercritical centrifuges, devices that can withstand very high rotational speeds, he said.

Documents the Indians gave potential suppliers for centrifuge parts “provide strong clues about where New Delhi’s supercritical centrifuge technology came from,” Pollack said.

“Despite some changes, the design is recognisable to the trained eye: It almost mirrors the G-2 centrifuge, a design that Khan stole from URENCO in the 1970s and later reproduced as Pakistan’s P-2 centrifuge,” he said.


Centrifuge specs are not the only apparent link between India’s enrichment programme and Khan’s operation, Pollack claimed.

The cast of characters also overlaps, starting with Gerhard Wisser, a German living in South Africa, who also supplied India’s centrifuge programme with specialised equipment, starting in the late 1980s, he said.


India A.Q. Khan’s mysterious fourth customer : US arms control expert | idrw.org

this guy is confused
 
Nonsense, utter nonsense.

AQ Khan was by no way a stellar nuclear scientist only a disgruntled employee who took trade secrets and contacts with him after parting on bad terms with his employers.
 
If there's a AQ Khan and India tie then shouldn't it be the reverse role considering India had the tech before Khan. Also why would India go to Khan when Khan's Dadaji (USSR) was with India. I am saying this because during that time India-USSR were way too close than what India-Russia are today but slowly and slowly this is again changing considering the big ticket projects like Brahmos, FGFA, MRTA and Russian access to Glossnass and offer to produce five civilian aircraft in India are very big deals and offers.
 
abe saale india ke khilaf he to banaya atom bum???
Magar saala mohajir A.Q khan dogala nikla.Pakistan se pahale apni mother India bhopal ko atim bumb diya(As usa expert report clears out).I tell you na these mohajirs are real bastards still help india against pakistan.:azn:
 
Thank u aqkhan. U shud have taken boat ride to india instead of humiliated in pak!
 
Thank u aqkhan. U shud have taken boat ride to india instead of humiliated in pak!
yeah. And by this time you would have been president or prime minister of india instead of being humiliated into the house arrest.
 
yeah. And by this time you would have been president or prime minister of india instead of being humiliated into the house arrest.

The difference is that the guy who became president of india through extraordinary contributions to the country's domestic missile program did not go about selling nuclear secrets to rogue nations for personal enrichment. Thats why APJ Abdul Kalam became president, and AQ Khan got arrested. He is lucky to have gotten only house arrest. In most countries, he would have been executed for high treason.
 
Back
Top Bottom