F-22Raptor
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2014
- Messages
- 16,980
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
nominal or PPP ??
Thats PPP which anyone on this forum since the 2010s knows no Chinese gave a s**t about….until now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nominal or PPP ??
To me though I prefer to use HDI over GDP/PPP. China maybe the second largest economy but most of their citizens still lives in Slums & poverty.Thats PPP which anyone on this forum since the 2010s knows no Chinese gave a s**t about….until now.
In reality it is exatly oppositePPP, which absolutely no one uses to measure relative national power. PPP is only useful when measuring individual standard of living. Real money is real power, not how much you pay for a loaf of bread at the grocery store.
can you meticulously explain where you heard that crap, China's whole population is only 1.4 billion, do you have a brain?can you meticulously explain how building 2 billion houses for a declining population isnt financial sepculation
Good oneA Chinese steel mill producing $100 worth of steel and Americunt OnlyFans hoe exposes her tits for $100 bucks are both generating the same amount of economic activity on paper.
One is more useful than the other.
lol, like this? how about your country, where are you from?To me though I prefer to use HDI over GDP/PPP. China maybe the second largest economy but most of their citizens still lives in Slums & poverty.
India will reduce the gap from around 6 times in 2020 to 3.5 times in 2030.
what the.. well guess I learn something new on pdf everydayhoeflation
That will mean China has barely twice India's GDP so China wouldbt have achieved that much compared to India then.purchasing power is what we use here
I would if the number suggest so. what's the point of choosing a measurement when it suits your narrative or dropping it when it contradict common sense? Every measure has its flaws, we choose purchasing power only because it's less flawed compare to nominal.That will mean China has barely twice India's GDP so China wouldbt have achieved that much compared to India then.
AND India will also have a far bigger GDP(about twice) than Japan. So you agree with that yeah?
Well, yeah as i said you havent achieved much compared to India despite your claims. barely twice India's GDP PPP wise. Guess China is almost Indias equal then..I would if the number suggest so. what's the point of choosing a measurement when it suits your narrative or dropping it when it contradict common sense? Every measure has its flaws, we choose purchasing power only because it's less flawed compare to nominal.
we don't care that much about India but it does looks like that you do. Just give it up.. India surpasses UK by all measurementWell, yeah as i said you havent achieved much compared to India despite your claims. barely twice India's GDP PPP wise. Guess China is almost Indias equal then..