What's new

Imran Khan’s ‘New Pakistan’ Is as Good as the Old- NY Times

I didn't read after. Muhammad Hanif.

The article begins with the word Imran, shouldn't have bothered to read after that.......unless you live in fairyland and have no idea about facts on the ground.

Fake News

What was fake in the article?

Miracles don't happen over night nor does the economy changes in few months. Give time to the man like before we gave it to Zardri the looter and Nawaz the embezzler. Lets pass the judgement when his tenure is over. Obviously he is walking over on some people toes rightly or wrongly and they don't like it and kicking up the fuss. As saying goes no pain no gain and I very much hope the pain nation is getting due to inflation and price rises will be worth it at the end. As far press freedom goes if media can't behave responsibly and try to create problems due to their foreign funded masters desires, whose whole agenda is to create anarchy and instability in our country. Advise will be pack your bags and move to your freedom loving masters countries. We can't afford to have you here as you are too posh for us due to the dollar payments you guys have pocketed from your masters..

It is very easy to give time to someone to fix the economy when his attempts have no consequences on the one giving the time. It is like me giving time to T. May to fix the Brexit issue.
 
. .
the article is written

By Mohammed Hanif

Mr. Hanif is a Pakistani novelist.


  • July 17, 2019
so it is more like this is his personal opinion ... and every individual has a right to differ from other .. it not necessary that has something to do with reality

Try differing in India with RSS mob. You will end up getting lynched.

The "New York times" are the same organisation who claimed that Saddam Hussein had WMD that could destroy Europe in 30 mins. It's hard to believe anything that comes from that paper regardless of who the author is.

Don't worry. Trump is putting the deep state to rest. NYT, WP and many more are just a mouthpiece of the deep state. The Pentagon, CIA, Democrats and others use these vehicles to frustrate their anger and frustration. It is good to know how your enemy thinks and feels. If you want to know how the deep state thinks and feels read the NYT.

The deep state in the US is at war with half the planet. Their warmongering is coming to an end. Their profiteering from endless wars is at danger. LOL who could have guessed that no other than Trump would end their shameless profiteering.
 
Last edited:
.
Due to their own corruption.
Parliamentarians are arrested on terrorism or drug-trafficking charges and denied bail.
He was caught red handed along with every thing about his crime.

Every poster has bashed either NYT or writer none of them have tried refuting claims made by author.
Probably political supporters of ruling party should improve their argument rather than raising their voice.
 
.
Imran Khan’s ‘New Pakistan’ Is as Good as the Old
The country looks like a struggling dictatorship.


By Mohammed Hanif

Mr. Hanif is a Pakistani novelist.

  • July 17, 2019

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Pakistan National Day, in March.CreditFarooq Naeem/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
merlin_152500650_e22810fd-8377-4a8a-8944-5cbd142a338f-articleLarge.jpg

Image
merlin_152500650_e22810fd-8377-4a8a-8944-5cbd142a338f-articleLarge.jpg

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Pakistan National Day, in March.CreditCreditFarooq Naeem/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
KARACHI, Pakistan — Imran Khan campaigned to become prime minister on the promise that he would create a “new Pakistan.” The country was going to be like the state of Medina that the Prophet Muhammad founded — a welfare state — Khan promised. Less than a year after coming to power, he has delivered a new Pakistan, and it looks like a struggling dictatorship.

Major opposition leaders are in jail; others aren’t allowed in the media. Parliamentarians are arrested on terrorism or drug-trafficking charges and denied bail. In this new Pakistan, the economy has been practically handed over to appointees from the International Monetary Fund. The price of bread is soaring, and bazaars where the poor do business with the poor are being demolished while barons of the stock exchange get government handouts.

Khan once talked about “dignity” and how you lose it when you take money from foreign powers. But what was one of his first moves after taking office? Chauffeuring Arab princes in the hope of getting soft loans.

He has said that he would prefer death to going to the I.M.F., but soon after becoming prime minister he went into a huddle with the I.M.F. chief and after protracted negotiations secured a loan of $6 billion.

stashed in Swiss banks. By now, though, it’s quite obvious that even if there is looted money in foreign banks, there is no way of bringing it back. Former President Asif Ali Zardari, who is in jail on money-laundering charges, was asked if he was willing to strike a deal with the government. “I will not give them six dollars,” he smirked.

Since the corrupt aren’t going to cough up their loot, Khan has had to go back to the mundane business of borrowing money and collecting taxes. But his passionate appeals that more Pakistanis pay their taxes don’t seem to be working. The tax-to-gross domestic product ratio is the lowest in five years, the tax authorities said recently. Maybe that’s because the people have seen too many of their leaders not pay what they owe. Although Khan’s assets were estimated at 3.8 billion rupees (about $36 million) in 2017, he pays fewer taxes than many mid-ranking journalists.

Khan used to claim that he is the best team-builder around. He has surrounded himself with the same political carpetbaggers he once railed against. More than half of his cabinet served the last military dictator, Pervez Musharraf. Of the man who now runs the railways ministry, Khan once said that he wouldn’t hire him as a peon; another person he called a bandit has become a crucial ally, as the speaker of the assembly in Punjab Province.

When he lectures on economic matters, Khan can sound like the Queen of England — as though he has never had to carry cash or set a monthly budget like middle-class citizens do. Like many affluent people who spend their lives in a bubble of financial security, he has been propagating Ayn Rand-esque myths about how to fix the economy. He has been saying that the one percent of Pakistanis who do pay taxes can’t carry the burden of the other 99 percent. Yet the 99 percent who don’t fill out returns definitely are funding the lifestyles of rich Pakistanis through indirect taxes, like those on gasoline and electricity. And yet they hardly get to see the inside of a hospital or the schools built with those taxes.

As Khan’s opponents question some of his statements, and his credentials, he has become more and more prickly. After Khan was called a “selected,” rather than elected, prime minister in Parliament, the speaker banned the use of the word “selected” on the floor. Since then, it seems that our representatives have never said “selected” as much as they do now.

When you are clueless in Pakistan, you turn to the army. And so Khan has appointed the army chief, Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, to his newly formed economic council. (Many would say the army chief appointed himself). The military already controlled security and foreign policy, and now it is promising to take us to new heights in economic affairs.

For a hint of who is really in charge, consider the case of two Pashtun lawmakers who have been arrested on questionable terrorism charges. Ali Wazir and Mohsin Dawar are the leaders of the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement, or P.T.M. (the Movement to Protect Pashtuns), which has been trying to counter the state’s narrative about Pashtuns being natural born warriors. They have been campaigning against extrajudicial killings and missing persons and for the removal of land mines from Pakistan’s tribal areas — and they have occasionally said that the Pakistani Army might have something to do with turning their homeland into a permanent war zone. (Khan used to say similar things. He once slept on the roads of Karachi to block NATO supplies because he believed, rightly, that these supplies were being used to wage war against the Pashtuns.)

After Wazir and Dawar were elected to Parliament, they started to say on the floor what they had been saying at P.T.M. rallies. And then, at a news conference in Islamabad in late April, the army spokesman Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor said of them, “their time is up.” A few weeks later, Wazir and Dawar were accused of attacking the Khar Mar army check post in North Waziristan in which at least 13 civilians are thought to have been killed. Yet plenty of videos of the scene appear to show them arguing with soldiers, trying to cross a barrier and being fired upon.

There has been no inquiry. Both parliamentarians remain in custody. And unlike other jailed politicians who are allowed to attend legislative sessions, Wazir and Dawar haven’t been seen or heard from since their arrest. The message is clear: You can’t mess with the army even if the people elected you.

Pakistan’s new establishment isn’t inventing any new tricks; it’s just honing old ones. A member of Parliament critical of the Khan government and his sponsors was booked on drug-smuggling charges earlier this month. The anti-narcotics force, which is headed by a major general, claimed to have discovered 15 kilos of heroin in his car.

Observers said this was a throwback to outright military rule and times when opposition politicians were accused of stealing cattle or a bomb was discovered in the home of the dissident poet Ustad Daman. (Daman did get a poem out of that.)

Pakistan’s army probably rightly believes that it will never run out of political collaborators to help it rule the country. In Imran Khan, the generals have found a rare entity: a populist who is eager to collaborate because even he isn’t sure whether he was elected or selected.

Khan represents the oldest of old Pakistan but with a sportsman’s zeal to win at any cost. Yet I have never seen a more miserable and angrier winning captain. Maybe that’s because he has come to realize that his election victory wasn’t the end of the game. The real game was only just beginning.

Mohammed Hanif (@mohammedhanif) is the author of the novels “A Case of Exploding Mangoes,” “Our Lady of Alice Bhatti” and “Red Birds.” He is a contributing opinion writer.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/17/opinion/imran-khan-pakistan.html

Isn't this type of semi populist, B-grade, anti-military Machismo opion piece just drips of the obvious while pointing at effects of the causes that stand more applicable and true for the earlier governing - filthy rich corroupt political leaders who looted and plundered in cohots with their favourite Generals and have left Pakistan high and dry.

So General Bajwa and Imran Khan, the men trying to do good by history and Pakistan, in supporting and enabling the state in the demise of the powerful corrupt who all but destroyed Pakistan's economy, is in the eyes of the righteous Mr. Hanif - nothing but business as usual - and more of the same - while Pakistan has suffered more and more due to corruption exactly because people stood by and did nothing but make some empty noises - people not very different than Mr.Hanif, knowing or unknowingly, who always point the finger at effect but never at the filthy rich corrupt lot who are the root cause.

What a pathetic, eye wash of an opionion piece, written in hopes of attracting cheap accolades while actually being just another cheap and fashionable anti-state mouth piece.
 
Last edited:
.
Isn't this type of semi populist, B-grade, anti-military Machismo opion piece just drips of the obvious while pointing at effects of the causes that stand more applicable and true for the earlier governing - filthy rich corroupt political leaders who looted and plundered in cohots with their favourite Generals and have left Pakistan high and dry.

So General Bajwa and Imran Khan, the men trying to do good by history, in supporting and enabling the state in the demise of the powerful corrupt who all but destroyed Pakistan's economy, is in the eyes of the righteous Mr. Hanif - nothing but business as usual - and more of the same - while Pakistan has suffered more and more due to corruption exactly because people stood by and did nothing but make some empty noises - people not very different than Mr.Hanif, knowing or unknowingly, who always point the finger at effect but never at the filthy rich corrupt lot who are the root cause.

According to Nawazoo supporters no one can do any good except Nawazoo.

Mr. Hanif doesn't care about Pakistan. Neither does he care about corruption in Pakistan. All he cares about is Nawazoo money flowing in his own bank account.
 
Last edited:
.
According to Nawazoo supporters no one can do any good except Nawazoo.

Mr. Hanif doesn't care about Pakistan. Neither does he care about corruption in Pakistan. All he cares about is Nawazoo money flowing in.
Thats the eye opener, more for the journalist lot themselves than anybody else, due to the degradation in what has become acceptable, moral and ethical that used to be its opposite.

The modern day journalists are becoming more and more loathsome because they insist on selling whatever sells and insist on calling it making an honest living instead of the filth it actually is reduced to these days.

This writer Hanif would have been seen writing this same article against Pakistan no matter who was at the helms simply because its fashionable and it sells not because its ethical or in this case, deplorable and pathetic to write against people trying to avenge Pakistan from the corrupt who destroyed its economy, simply because the writer can play with words in the name of journalism or opinion making.

There is term becoming applicable for more and more journalists that they insist on proving true themselves, one which was coined for "the blood sucking lawyers" i.e. "the blood leaching journalists".
 
.
Imran Khan’s ‘New Pakistan’ Is as Good as the Old
The country looks like a struggling dictatorship.


By Mohammed Hanif

Mr. Hanif is a Pakistani novelist.

  • July 17, 2019

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Pakistan National Day, in March.CreditFarooq Naeem/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
merlin_152500650_e22810fd-8377-4a8a-8944-5cbd142a338f-articleLarge.jpg

Image
merlin_152500650_e22810fd-8377-4a8a-8944-5cbd142a338f-articleLarge.jpg

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Pakistan National Day, in March.CreditCreditFarooq Naeem/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
KARACHI, Pakistan — Imran Khan campaigned to become prime minister on the promise that he would create a “new Pakistan.” The country was going to be like the state of Medina that the Prophet Muhammad founded — a welfare state — Khan promised. Less than a year after coming to power, he has delivered a new Pakistan, and it looks like a struggling dictatorship.

Major opposition leaders are in jail; others aren’t allowed in the media. Parliamentarians are arrested on terrorism or drug-trafficking charges and denied bail. In this new Pakistan, the economy has been practically handed over to appointees from the International Monetary Fund. The price of bread is soaring, and bazaars where the poor do business with the poor are being demolished while barons of the stock exchange get government handouts.

Khan once talked about “dignity” and how you lose it when you take money from foreign powers. But what was one of his first moves after taking office? Chauffeuring Arab princes in the hope of getting soft loans.

He has said that he would prefer death to going to the I.M.F., but soon after becoming prime minister he went into a huddle with the I.M.F. chief and after protracted negotiations secured a loan of $6 billion.

stashed in Swiss banks. By now, though, it’s quite obvious that even if there is looted money in foreign banks, there is no way of bringing it back. Former President Asif Ali Zardari, who is in jail on money-laundering charges, was asked if he was willing to strike a deal with the government. “I will not give them six dollars,” he smirked.

Since the corrupt aren’t going to cough up their loot, Khan has had to go back to the mundane business of borrowing money and collecting taxes. But his passionate appeals that more Pakistanis pay their taxes don’t seem to be working. The tax-to-gross domestic product ratio is the lowest in five years, the tax authorities said recently. Maybe that’s because the people have seen too many of their leaders not pay what they owe. Although Khan’s assets were estimated at 3.8 billion rupees (about $36 million) in 2017, he pays fewer taxes than many mid-ranking journalists.

Khan used to claim that he is the best team-builder around. He has surrounded himself with the same political carpetbaggers he once railed against. More than half of his cabinet served the last military dictator, Pervez Musharraf. Of the man who now runs the railways ministry, Khan once said that he wouldn’t hire him as a peon; another person he called a bandit has become a crucial ally, as the speaker of the assembly in Punjab Province.

When he lectures on economic matters, Khan can sound like the Queen of England — as though he has never had to carry cash or set a monthly budget like middle-class citizens do. Like many affluent people who spend their lives in a bubble of financial security, he has been propagating Ayn Rand-esque myths about how to fix the economy. He has been saying that the one percent of Pakistanis who do pay taxes can’t carry the burden of the other 99 percent. Yet the 99 percent who don’t fill out returns definitely are funding the lifestyles of rich Pakistanis through indirect taxes, like those on gasoline and electricity. And yet they hardly get to see the inside of a hospital or the schools built with those taxes.

As Khan’s opponents question some of his statements, and his credentials, he has become more and more prickly. After Khan was called a “selected,” rather than elected, prime minister in Parliament, the speaker banned the use of the word “selected” on the floor. Since then, it seems that our representatives have never said “selected” as much as they do now.

When you are clueless in Pakistan, you turn to the army. And so Khan has appointed the army chief, Gen. Qamar Javed Bajwa, to his newly formed economic council. (Many would say the army chief appointed himself). The military already controlled security and foreign policy, and now it is promising to take us to new heights in economic affairs.

For a hint of who is really in charge, consider the case of two Pashtun lawmakers who have been arrested on questionable terrorism charges. Ali Wazir and Mohsin Dawar are the leaders of the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement, or P.T.M. (the Movement to Protect Pashtuns), which has been trying to counter the state’s narrative about Pashtuns being natural born warriors. They have been campaigning against extrajudicial killings and missing persons and for the removal of land mines from Pakistan’s tribal areas — and they have occasionally said that the Pakistani Army might have something to do with turning their homeland into a permanent war zone. (Khan used to say similar things. He once slept on the roads of Karachi to block NATO supplies because he believed, rightly, that these supplies were being used to wage war against the Pashtuns.)

After Wazir and Dawar were elected to Parliament, they started to say on the floor what they had been saying at P.T.M. rallies. And then, at a news conference in Islamabad in late April, the army spokesman Maj. Gen. Asif Ghafoor said of them, “their time is up.” A few weeks later, Wazir and Dawar were accused of attacking the Khar Mar army check post in North Waziristan in which at least 13 civilians are thought to have been killed. Yet plenty of videos of the scene appear to show them arguing with soldiers, trying to cross a barrier and being fired upon.

There has been no inquiry. Both parliamentarians remain in custody. And unlike other jailed politicians who are allowed to attend legislative sessions, Wazir and Dawar haven’t been seen or heard from since their arrest. The message is clear: You can’t mess with the army even if the people elected you.

Pakistan’s new establishment isn’t inventing any new tricks; it’s just honing old ones. A member of Parliament critical of the Khan government and his sponsors was booked on drug-smuggling charges earlier this month. The anti-narcotics force, which is headed by a major general, claimed to have discovered 15 kilos of heroin in his car.

Observers said this was a throwback to outright military rule and times when opposition politicians were accused of stealing cattle or a bomb was discovered in the home of the dissident poet Ustad Daman. (Daman did get a poem out of that.)

Pakistan’s army probably rightly believes that it will never run out of political collaborators to help it rule the country. In Imran Khan, the generals have found a rare entity: a populist who is eager to collaborate because even he isn’t sure whether he was elected or selected.

Khan represents the oldest of old Pakistan but with a sportsman’s zeal to win at any cost. Yet I have never seen a more miserable and angrier winning captain. Maybe that’s because he has come to realize that his election victory wasn’t the end of the game. The real game was only just beginning.

Mohammed Hanif (@mohammedhanif) is the author of the novels “A Case of Exploding Mangoes,” “Our Lady of Alice Bhatti” and “Red Birds.” He is a contributing opinion writer.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/17/opinion/imran-khan-pakistan.html

Ya... what ever....
 
.
What was fake in the article?

1) The implied political victimization of opposition parties.
2) The illusion that economy can be shifted in just mere 11 months.

The rest can one discuss.

Let me tell you what is real. Nawaz Sharif and Zardari behind bars. It is as real as it gets.

This is enough satisfaction for the time being. I am sure the rest will follow in the months ahead.

Nothing to do with Khan that NAB and Supreme Court have jailed them.
 
.
lol, it's funny how the comments here start from ad hominem attacks and fake news and mocking the author instead of evaluating the article. I kinda see a trend here.
 
.
4 pages of glorification of hate against your Prime Minister. Great going Pakistanis.
 
.
1) The implied political victimization of opposition parties.
2) The illusion that economy can be shifted in just mere 11 months.

The rest can one discuss.

I don't think the victimization is implied, the author is open about it and the fact that cases against both NS and AZ are weak.

And should we care about sentences to NS & AZ? I want to see the recovered billions of dollars that IK promised atop containers.

As for the economy, it cannot be fixed in 11 years let alone 11 months; however, as is evident, it can be severely damaged in 11 months.

4 pages of glorification of hate against your Prime Minister. Great going Pakistanis.

You should have seen us when BB/NS served as PM's and when AZ served as President.
 
.
You should have seen us when BB/NS served as PM's and when AZ served as President.

They (Sharifs and Zardaris) were corrupt traitors and served no one but their corrupt dynasties. May they get what they deserve..

if New York times wrote something against them in the past, They deserve praise for it. but whats the point of whining against their arrest now except Hatred.
 
.
don't think the victimization is implied, the author is open about it and the fact that cases against both NS and AZ are weak.

And should we care about sentences to NS & AZ? I want to see the recovered billions of dollars that IK promised atop containers.

As for the economy, it cannot be fixed in 11 years let alone 11 months; however, as is evident, it can be severely damaged in 11 months.

GoP has nothing to do with NAB or SC actions. NAB/SC sentenced Mr. Sharif and Mr. Zardari not PM Kahn.

Billions of dollars(political rhetoric) can only be achieved through legislation which you have the right to protest for is taking time and complicating the process.

We can only hold him for his words on the floor of the parliament and not atop containers or atop Weed mountain.
 
.
lol, it's funny how the comments here start from ad hominem attacks and fake news and mocking the author instead of evaluating the article. I kinda see a trend here.






And those that belong to the race and nation that call for the death and destruction of the Pakistani race and nation wouldn't say anything else...........:lol:

So lies that the NYT spewed which resulted in the death of over 2 million Iraqis/af-ghands is a trivial matter and should not be mentioned..........:azn:
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom