What's new

Imran Khan: Why The West Craves Materialism & Why The East Sticks To Religion

FireFighter

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
961
Reaction score
0

Why The West Craves Materialism & Why The East Sticks To Religion

November 6, 2008 by TMO

Listen to this article. Powered by Odiogo.com

By Imran Khan

imran_khan

My generation grew up at a time when colonial hang-up was at its peak. Our older generation had been slaves and had a huge inferiority complex of the British. The school I went to was similar to all elite schools in Pakistan . Despite gaining independent, they were, and still are, producing replicas of public schoolboys rather than Pakistanis.

I read Shakespeare, which was fine, but no Allama Iqbal – the national poet of Pakistan . The class on Islamic studies was not taken seriously, and when I left school I was considered among the elite of the country because I could speak English and wore Western clothes.

Despite periodically shouting ‘Pakistan Zindabad’ in school functions, I considered my own culture backward and religion outdated. Among our group if any one talked about religion, prayed or kept a beard he was immediately branded a Mullah.

Because of the power of the Western media, our heroes were Western movie stars or pop stars. When I went to Oxford already burdened with this hang up, things didn’t get any easier. At Oxford , not just Islam, but all religions were considered anachronism. Science had replaced religion and if something couldn’t be logically proved it did not exist. All supernatural stuff was confined to the movies.

Philosophers like Darwin , who with his half-baked theory of evolution had supposedly disproved the creation of men and hence religion, were read and revered. Moreover, European history reflected its awful experience with religion. The horrors committed by the Christian clergy during the Inquisition era had left a powerful impact on the Western mind.

To understand why the West is so keen on secularism, one should go to places like Cordoba in Spain and see the torture apparatus used during the Spanish Inquisition. Also the persecution of scientists as heretics by the clergy had convinced the Europeans that all religions are regressive.

However, the biggest factor that drove people like me away from religion was the selective Islam practiced by most of its preachers. In short, there was a huge difference between what they practiced and what they preached. Also, rather than explaining the philosophy behind the religion, there was an overemphasis on rituals.

I feel that humans are different to animals. While, the latter can be drilled, humans need to be intellectually convinced. That is why the Qur’an constantly appeals to reason. The worst, of course, was the exploitation of Islam for political gains by various individuals or groups.

Hence, it was a miracle I did not become an atheist. The only reason why I did not was the powerful religious influence my mother wielded on me since my childhood. It was not so much out of conviction but love for her that I stayed a Muslim.

However, my Islam was selective. I accepted only parts of the religion that suited me. Prayers were restricted to Eid days and occasionally on Fridays, when my father insisted on taking me to the mosque with him.

All in all I was smoothly moving to becoming a Pukka Brown Sahib. After all I had the right credentials in terms of school, university and, above all, acceptability in the English aristocracy, something that our brown sahibs would give their lives for. So what led me to do a ‘lota’ on the Brown Sahib culture and instead become a ‘desi’? Well it did not just happen overnight.

Firstly, the inferiority complex that my generation had inherited gradually went as I developed into a world-class athlete. Secondly, I was in the unique position of living between two cultures. I began to see the advantages and the disadvantages of both societies.

In Western societies, institutions were strong while they were collapsing in our country. However, there was an area where we were and still are superior, and that is our family life. I began to realize that this was the Western society’s biggest loss. In trying to free itself from the oppression of the clergy, they had removed both God and religion from their lives. While science, no matter how much it progresses, can answer a lot of questions – two questions it will never be able to answer: One, what is the purpose of our existence and two, what happens to us when we die?

It is this vacuum that I felt created the materialistic and the hedonistic culture. If this is the only life then one must make hay while the sun shines – and in order to do so one needs money. Such a culture is bound to cause psychological problems in a human being, as there was going to be an imbalance between the body and the soul.
Consequently, in the US , which has shown the greatest materialistic progress while giving its citizens numerous rights, almost 60 percent of the population consult psychiatrists. Yet, amazingly in modern psychology, there is no study of the human soul. Sweden and Switzerland , who provide the most welfare to their citizens, also have the highest suicide rates. Hence, man is not necessarily content with material well-being and needs something more.

Since all morality has it roots in religion, once religion was removed, immorality has progressively grown since the 70s. Its direct impact has been on family life. In the UK , the divorce rate is 60 percent, while it is estimated that there are over 35 percent single mothers. The crime rate is rising in almost all Western societies, but the most disturbing fact is the alarming increase in racism. While science always tries to prove the inequality of man it is only religion that preaches the equality of man.

Between 1991 and 1997, it was estimated that total immigration into Europe was around 520,000, and there were racially motivated attacks all over, especially in Britain , France and Germany . In Pakistan during the Afghan war, we had over four million refugees, and despite the people being so much poorer, there was no racial tension.

There was a sequence of events in the 80s that moved me toward God as the Qur’an says: ‘There are signs for people of understanding. ‘ One of them was cricket. As I was a student of the game, the more I understood the game, the more I began to realize that what I considered to be chance was, in fact, the will of Allah. A pattern, which became clearer with time.

But it was not until Salman Rushdie’s ‘Satanic Verses’ that my understanding of Islam began to develop. People like me who were living in the Western world bore the brunt of anti-Islam prejudice that followed the Muslim reaction to the book. We were left with two choices: fight or flight. Since I felt strongly that the attacks on Islam were unfair, I decided to fight. It was then I realized that I was not equipped to do so as my knowledge of Islam was inadequate.

Hence I started my research and for me a period of my greatest enlightenment. I read scholars like Ali Shariati, Muhammad Asad, Iqbal, Gai Eaton, plus of course, a study of Qur’an. I will try to explain as concisely as is possible, what ‘discovering the truth’ meant for me. When the believers are addressed in the Qur’an, it always says, ‘Those who believe and do good deeds.’ In other words, a Muslim has dual function, one toward God and the other toward fellow human beings.

The greatest impact of believing in God for me meant that I lost all fear of human beings. The Qur’an liberates man from man when it says that life and death and respect and humiliation are God’s jurisdiction, so we do not have to bow before other human beings.

Moreover, since this is a transitory world where we prepare for the eternal one, I broke out of the self-imposed prisons, such as growing old (such a curse in the Western world, as a result of which, plastic surgeons are having a field day), materialism, ego, what people say and so on. It is important to note that one does not eliminate earthly desires. But instead of being controlled by them, one controls them.

By following the second part of believing in Islam, I have become a better human being. Rather than being self-centered and living for the self, I feel that because the Almighty gave so much to me, in turn I must use that blessing to help the less privileged. This I did by following the fundamentals of Islam rather than becoming a Kalashnikov- wielding fanatic.

I have become a tolerant and a giving human being who feels compassion for the underprivileged. Instead of attributing success to myself, I know it is because of God’s will, hence I learned humility instead of arrogance.

Also, instead of the snobbish Brown Sahib attitude toward our masses, I believe in egalitarianism and strongly feel against the injustice done to the weak in our society. According to the Qur’an, ‘Oppression is worse than killing.’ In fact only now do I understand the true meaning of Islam, if you submit to the will of Allah, you have inner peace.

Through my faith, I have discovered strength within me that I never knew existed and that has released my potential in life. I feel that in Pakistan we have selective Islam. Just believing in God and going through the rituals is not enough. One also has to be a good human being. I feel there are certain Western countries with far more Islamic traits than us in Pakistan , especially in the way they protect the rights of their citizens, or for that matter their justice system. In fact some of the finest individuals I know live there.

What I dislike about them is their double standards in the way they protect the rights of their citizens but consider citizens of other countries as being somehow inferior to them as human being, e.g. dumping toxic waste in the Third World , advertising cigarettes that are not allowed in the West and selling drugs that are banned in the West.

One of the problems facing Pakistan is the polarization of two reactionary groups. On the one side is the Westernized group that looks upon Islam through Western eyes and has inadequate knowledge about the subject. It reacts strongly to anyone trying to impose Islam in society and wants only a selective part of the religion. On the other extreme is the group that reacts to this Westernized elite and in trying to become a defender of the faith, takes up such intolerant and self-righteous attitudes that are repugnant to the spirit of Islam.

What needs to be done is to somehow start a dialogue between the two extremes. In order for this to happen, the group on whom the greatest proportion of our educational resources is spent in this country must study Islam properly.

Whether they become practicing Muslims or believe in God is entirely a personal choice. As the Qur’an tells us there is ‘no compulsion in religion.’ However, they must arm themselves with knowledge as a weapon to fight extremism. Just by turning up their noses at extremism the problem is not going to be solved.

The Qur’an calls Muslims ‘the middle nation’, not of extremes. The Holy Prophet (s) was told to simply give the message and not worry whether people converted or not, therefore, there is no question in Islam of forcing your opinions on anyone else.

Moreover, we are told to respect other religions, their places of worship and their prophets. It should be noted that no Muslim missionaries or armies ever went to Malaysia or Indonesia . The people converted to Islam due to the high principles and impeccable character of the Muslim traders.

At the moment, the worst advertisements for Islam are the countries with their selective Islam, especially where religion is used to deprive people of their rights. In fact, a society that obeys fundamentals of Islam has to be a liberal one.

If Pakistan’s Westernized class starts to study Islam, not only will it be able to help society fight sectarianism and extremism, but it will also make them realize what a progressive religion Islam is. They will also be able to help the Western world by articulating Islamic concepts. Recently, Prince Charles accepted that the Western world can learn from Islam. But how can this happen if the group that is in the best position to project Islam gets its attitudes from the West and considers Islam backward? Islam is a universal religion and that is why? our Prophet (peace be upon him) was called a Mercy for all mankind.
 
Love of money kills spirituality, many saints had no big houses or bank balance but they loved beauty and nature.

yup and the reason is some where in this para


One of the problems facing Pakistan is the polarization of two reactionary groups. On the one side is the Westernized group that looks upon Islam through Western eyes and has inadequate knowledge about the subject. It reacts strongly to anyone trying to impose Islam in society and wants only a selective part of the religion. On the other extreme is the group that reacts to this Westernized elite and in trying to become a defender of the faith, takes up such intolerant and self-righteous attitudes that are repugnant to the spirit of Islam.
 
The East?

Don't China, Japan and Korea constitute a major part of the "East"? These countries have one of the largest populations of atheists.
 
yup and the reason is some where in this para


On the other extreme is the group that reacts to this Westernized elite and in trying to become a defender of the faith, takes up such intolerant and self-righteous attitudes that are repugnant to the spirit of Islam.
Extremist have harm Islam more then any one else.
 

Why The West Craves Materialism & Why The East Sticks To Religion

The west has "Material" and the East largely sticks to religion because they don't have it. As our societies change, so do we. The west stuck to religion for a very long time. As societies become more liberal people no longer accept everything that was stuffed down their throats. The same change is slowly seen in the "East.


Philosophers like Darwin , who with his half-baked theory of evolution had supposedly disproved the creation of men and hence religion, were read and revered.

Half baked as opposed to what? Mr. Imran Khan's fully baked personal opinion?
To understand why the West is so keen on secularism,

Not just the west, lots of us are keen about secularism too..

The poorest and the least uneducated are the most devout. Should tell us something, shouldn't it? Educate and improve the lot of the population of the "East" and then see if the claim about "East" & "West" can still be made.

BTW Buddhism is an atheistic religion and makes no claim for God.
 
Yup... but look at the percentage of Chinese, Korean and Japanese population that actually practices Buddhism.

There's a huge misconception in Pakistan that Chinese or Koreans practice Buddhism. Religion in these countries is a far different concept and its practice is also different from the religions that are spread across South and Southwest Asia.

A large percentage of Chinese whose views are influenced by Confucianism, define religion as a set of customs and ethics rather than belief and worship of a deity by using a mixture of Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism. Even with this confused definition of religion, 8-14% of Chinese define themselves as atheists.

Japanese are sticking in large numbers to what they call "New Religions" which are variations of Shintoism and Buddhism.

South Koreans are mostly atheists, with the percentage ranging between 46 and 54 percent.

North Korea's state religion is worship of Kim II-Sun and Kim Jong-il :cheesy:
15% people define themselves as atheists though.

PS: As this article has been penned down by a semi-politician (yes he's not a full time politician), I won't comment on posting this and flaming a debate of state religion vs secularism, conservatism vs liberalism, and "moral corruption". There's been too much of this already, especially this week.
 
who the hell is Imran khan?!
"his half-baked theory of evolution "

lmao what a crack head
 
if someone think west is not religious then they are wrong..they are as religious as we are..there are so many communal clashes in west but they never come to media...
 
Since all morality has it roots in religion, once religion was removed, immorality has progressively grown

This is the biggest claim that Imran Khan has made. Philosophers have debated this for long and even academic journals cannot do justice to such a big topic which he has aptly summarized in one sentence. Morality and Ethics are quite mixed concepts in the mind of many. The debate of religion as the sole source of morality is highly charged and never constructive. Morality as a social construct leads to similarly polarized opinions. I always find it necessary not to indulge in such wastage of time and argue over ideas which will have no positive conclusion. This is not science that is marked by clear cut lines but rather religion and morality where there are grey areas and conclusions are based on deep rooted personal and social opinions which cannot be won over in debates.

"his half-baked theory of evolution"

Discussing evolution vs creation in a piece of social and political commentary is highly illogical. These are matters left best for people to reach a conclusion for themselves rather than jamming down their throat.

It should be noted that no Muslim missionaries or armies ever went to Malaysia or Indonesia

Another half baked claim. I won't go deep into the debate whether Islam was spread by the power of sword but expansion across Africa, South Asia and Europe are known to all of us. Whether you consider it your religious duty to "liberate" others, the fact of the matter is armies of Muslim invaders came and ruled over locals for long periods of time.

Sweden and Switzerland , who provide the most welfare to their citizens, also have the highest suicide rates

Top of the list is Belarus with an average of 35.1 suicides per 100,000 people
Switzerland : 17.5
Sweden : 13.3

This was an unnecessary jibe taken at welfare states which have succeed in providing an extremely high standard of living to their citizens. Factually wrong to top it off.

There is no big clash of cultures going on in Pakistan. The people living in the region of what is Pakistan today were largely peaceful and secular in public life for much of history. Adherence to sufis and mystics is a clear symbol of that. Islam, as it is practiced today in Pakistan, is a traditional and orthodox form of Islam which was quite a bit different than what the Sufis preached. I don't want to go into a debate about what interpretation of religion is right, all I'm saying is that mainstream practice of Islam has evolved in South Asia. Today's interpretations are highly influenced by late nineteenth and early twentieth century works by South Asian Islamic scholars and was popularized by evangelists at the dawn of the last century. Adherence to sufism has largely vanished among urban classes but rural people are largely adhering to that culture (there should be no calls as to whether their version is right or wrong, debate over such matters is pointless).

Pakistan's "westernized" elite was far more prominent throughout our early years. Before Zia's "Islamization" and Bhutto's efforts at pleasing his opposition through Islamic reforms, the elite was quite visible practicing their "western" beliefs. Both the military and civil bureaucracy adhered to the customs of their colonial lords (and colonial hangups are visible in the military even today). Yet there were no large and vocal calls for an end to horse racing, gambling or drinking in the '60s. There was never a clash of cultures in this society and there never will be.

Emulating the west might be unnecessary and we should develop our own economic models, but this should not involve unnecessary attacks and jibes at other cultures and societies. This topic should be left to discussion in academic journals where reason and logic are supreme rather than eloquence and pure rhetoric.

PS :- I have worked as a political worker for PTI for over 3 years, so don't come with "you hate Imran" replies. Also, this thread should be in Current Events & Social Issues .
 
Last edited:
I think when he talks about "the east", he means the Muslim world.


A lot of indians are becoming athiests these days, especially the younger generations of indians.


We call india, a west wannabe.
 
This is the biggest claim that Imran Khan has made. Philosophers have debated this for long and even academic journals cannot do justice to such a big topic which he has aptly summarized in one sentence. Morality and Ethics are quite mixed concepts in the mind of many. The debate of religion as the sole source of morality is highly charged and never constructive. Morality as a social construct leads to similarly polarized opinions. I always find it necessary not to indulge in such wastage of time and argue over ideas which will have no positive conclusion. This is not science that is marked by clear cut lines but rather religion and morality where there are grey areas and conclusions are based on deep rooted personal and social opinions which cannot be won over in debates.

That claim is actually nonsense. Mr.Imran Khan is confusing personal morality in respect to sexual attitudes with a larger public morality. It could be argued that as Europeans have become less religious, the society has redefined morality to exclude religious bias and is actually more fair.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom