Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keyboard warriors raised RS 500 Crore for the flood victims.
"Advocates Munir A. Malik and Makhdoom Ali Khan, who were appointed by the court for assistance in the decision, both advised the court against any further proceedings in the case and to accept Imran Khan’s response. However, the court decided against their opinion."Expand on this please.
This country is run by devil worshipers Dogs !!!!
"Advocates Munir A. Malik and Makhdoom Ali Khan, who were appointed by the court for assistance in the decision, both advised the court against any further proceedings in the case and to accept Imran Khan’s response. However, the court decided against their opinion."
IHC to indict Imran Khan in contempt case on September 22
“We are defenders of freedom of expression but incitement cannot be allowed,” Justice Minallah said.www.globalvillagespace.com
Expand on this please.
Meanwhile, Munir A. Malik, amicus curiae for the court, said the contempt law had been used to strengthen the judiciary. “It is true that there are judgments of the Supreme Court in contempt of court cases, but it is also true that this law is constantly evolving.”
He said that the words spoken outside the court could never impact the IHC.
“The words are disappointing, but not an obstacle to the dispensation of justice,” he added and opined that the contempt proceedings could either be quashed if an apology was tendered or better conduct was shown.
Malik, subsequently, requested the court to wrap the contempt case in light of the reply submitted by Imran.
In his arguments, Makhdoom Ali Khan, another lawyer assisting the IHC, said that public interest lied in both dispensing justice and the freedom of speech.
“In America, a president had called a court decision the worst,” he highlighted, going on that the judiciary there had shown restraint and taken out a second way out.
Here, Justice Minallah said that the same country had also suspended Donald Trump’s Twitter account for inciting followers. “This is the reason why we are saying the choice of words is very important for a political leader,” he said.
However, Makhdoom contended that the remarks of a leader, made at a rally, could not affect the court’s proceedings, saying that further time could be granted to the PTI leader.
“Imran should use the words of regret and apology in his detailed reply,” he said, urging the court to show “magnanimity and pardon Imran”.
To this, Justice Minallah asked if someone’s ego was more important than the prestige of the judiciary and pointed out that Imran did not even tender an unconditional apology in his response.
Subsequently, the judges took a five-minute break.
IHC to indict Imran Khan in contempt case after finding reply ‘unsatisfactory’
Court says former prime minister will be indicted on September 22; Justice Sattar observes words used by Imran were "threatening".www.dawn.com
The court appointed two amicus curiae to the case, to assist the court with the proceedings and in making a judgement. Here is what they had to say:
How brilliant that Minallah picks the Twitter ban. The idiot needs to know that Twitter is a private company that has a right to regulate usage of its platform. In no instance could the government come in and define what is correct and incorrect language or speech. That is the whole purpose of independence of governments/laws/judiciary from taking sides in political discourse or religious management. For Minallah to express that in court tells me nothing but a pre-defined agenda at play and two how ill-informed and ignorant the fellow is.The court appointed two amicus curiae to the case, to assist the court with the proceedings and in making a judgement. Here is what they had to say:
Is mulk main judges ko court proceedings, dispensation of justice, preventing abuse of law say zyada parwah contempt ki hai.
I know people who missed being with their loved ones in their last time because the judge went on a friggin holiday for two months! And that person's bail application didn't get processed in time.
I told you that I have a hunch it's not going to go away, seems like my hunch was right. They are hell bent on knocking out IK technically."Advocates Munir A. Malik and Makhdoom Ali Khan, who were appointed by the court for assistance in the decision, both advised the court against any further proceedings in the case and to accept Imran Khan’s response. However, the court decided against their opinion."
IHC to indict Imran Khan in contempt case on September 22
“We are defenders of freedom of expression but incitement cannot be allowed,” Justice Minallah said.www.globalvillagespace.com