What's new

Imran arrives in New York on ‘Mission Kashmir’

Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
1,767
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
WASHINGTON: Prime Minister Imran Khan reached New York on Saturday to highlight the Kashmir issue in the world’s parliament, the UN General Assembly.

“This is mission Kashmir for the prime minister and for Pakistan,” said Pakistan’s permanent representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi. “His message will be clear: the occupation must end, and a peaceful solution found for the Kashmir dispute.”

The prime minister joins a galaxy of world leaders on Tuesday when the 74th session of the UN General Assembly begins its annual debate on issues of peace and security.

Two meetings are scheduled between PM and Trump; MBS persuades premier to travel by former’s plane

“He will highlight the plight of the Kashmiri people who continue to suffer a suffocating lockdown and a brutal occupation,” said Ambassador Lodhi, adding the prime minister would meet world leaders and the UN secretary general.

She said the prime minister’s visit had attracted intense interest from the international community and the US media and his engagements in New York include a number of media appearances.

This is the prime minister’s first General Assembly visit and “he will be the voice of the Kashmiri people at the UN,” the ambassador said.

Mr Khan is staying at New York’s Roosevelt Hotel, which is partially owned by PIA. This’s where most Pakistani leaders stayed till September 2008, when former president Asif Ali Zardari and then prime minister Nawaz Sharif abandoned it for grander hotels like Waldorf Astoria, which cost at least 20 times more than Roosevelt.

The prime minister arrived in New York during the weekend, which gives him the time to consult with Pakistani diplomats and prominent members of the Pakistani American community before meeting world leaders.

Mr Khan’s first informal engagement on Monday is breakfast with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson. As always, the Pakistani prime minister’s first official engagement at the UN is with Chinese representative on Monday when the PM meets Vice President Wang Qishan.

Read: Trump, Imran to meet on 23rd, talks to focus on Kashmir

At around 1am on Monday, the prime minister meets US President Donald Trump, which could be the first of the two meetings Mr Khan is expected to have with the US leader during the UN session. This would also be President Trump’s second meeting with a South Asian leader in less than 24 hours.

President Trump is scheduled to address a joint rally with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at Houston, Texas, on Sept 22, hours before he meets the Pakistani leader. President Trump and Mr Modi are also expected to have a separate meeting before or after the rally, focusing on India-Pakistan relations.

Most world leaders will be in New York on Monday, to participate in the general debate, which begins on Tuesday.

Both Pakistani and Indian prime ministers are scheduled to address the UN General Assembly on Sept 27. Mr Modi will speak first, on Friday morning, while Prime Minister Khan will speak later in the afternoon.

Prime Minister Khan has already announced that he will highlight the Kashmir issue in his address, exposing the ethical and legal bankruptcy of India’s Aug 5 annexation of the occupied valley.

The Indian media reported earlier this week that Prime Minister Modi will not talk about the annexation or its consequences in his address. Instead, he would repeat New Delhi’s claim that Pakistan may send militants into the valley to take advantage of the volatile situation.

Mr Khan has made it clear that Pakistan not only opposes all such activities but has also increased its vigilance to prevent militants from taking advantage of the situation. Islamabad fears that India may carry out violent attacks inside Kashmir and blame Pakistan.

On Wednesday, Mr Khan warned citizens against joining the fight in held Kashmir, saying that Indian authorities were waiting for “any excuse” to crack down on the people of Kashmir.

President Trump’s recent comments on the Kashmir dispute have triggered speculations about an indirect dialogue between the two South Asian neighbours during the UNGA, with Washington playing the role of a facilitator.

Earlier this week, President Trump told reporters at a White House briefing that “a lot of progress” has been made in defusing India-Pakistan tensions and his statement strengthened these speculations.

Mr Trump’s expected meetings with both Indian and Pakistani prime ministers before and during the UNGA have enhanced the possibility that he may use this occasion to discuss the situation in held Kashmir.

After annexing the disputed territory, India has placed millions of Kashmiri people under military siege, and is keeping them incommunicado, with thousands thrown in jails.



UN secretary general

On Thursday, UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he would raise the Kashmir issue during his discussions with various leaders attending the 74th UNGA.

“I think he will also use the opportunity of discussions during the General Assembly to raise it,” the UN chief’s spokesman said, without naming the leaders the UN chief would talk to about the situation in India-held Kashmir.

The prime minister will also co-host a meeting at the UN with Turkey’s President Erdogan on Countering Hate Speech.

A trilateral summit is also planned with Malaysia and Turkey.

He will address the UNGA on three more occasions at the Climate Change Summit, Summit on Universal Health Care and Financing for Development.

Outside the UN, the prime minister will address the Asia Society and the Council on Foreign Relations, New York.

US and UN officials have made massive security arrangements around the United Nations complex on the banks of East River to protect the world leaders attending the session.

Barricades have been erected on the roads leading to the UN building while some streets have been closed to general traffic.

---------------------------------------------
Published in Dawn, September 22nd, 2019
 
Last edited:
. .
He won't be able to make much impact. I am being honest. The Western world in particular doesn't care about Kashmiris. They care about their business deals with India. More than a month has passed, but nothing has happened. The Kashmiris have been raped, beaten up and silenced. Zero condemnation from the world let alone action against India.

Pakistan is fulfilling its duty, but should look for other more meaningful solutions after this.

The prime minister should hand out a stark warning to everyone at UNGA. A storm is coming and when it comes everyone present at UNGA will be held responsible. That needs to be the crux of the message. Look them straight in the eye and tell it with full force.

Despite OIC and Umaah, Pakistan couldn't event got 16 votes in UNGA. On US front Trump just made fun of IK, i feel very bad about it. WH knows and planned the IOK annex with India.

Probably the White House did that. The White House is also going to find out what their actions will lead to.

As for Ummah chummah, we give them a middle finger. They don't mean much to us.
 
.
Its shocking to see no one from the white house was there to welcome the great IK.
 
.
Its shocking to see no one from the white house was there to welcome the great IK.

It is not shocking. This is expected. The US is not a friend of Pakistan. It is a "friend" of India until it serves its interests.

The bitter truth for Pakistan is that the US relies on it in Afghanistan. The US uses Pakistani supply routes and cannot totally abandon Pakistan. The US is also very allergic to Pakistan allying with China. Finally the US wants to denuclearize Pakistan.

That is reason enough to remain enganged with Pakistan.
 
.
Its shocking to see no one from the white house was there to welcome the great IK.
This was the same shit you Indians were spewing on IK first visit to the US without even knowing how official visits in the US are categorized and you are doing it again. PM is there to attend the UNG not on visit to US to meet Trump. Yet he has two appointments with US president. So your point is?

It is not shocking. This is expected. The US is not a friend of Pakistan. It is a "friend" of India until it serves its interests.

The bitter truth for Pakistan is that the US relies on it in Afghanistan. The US uses Pakistani supply routes and cannot totally abandon Pakistan. The US is also very allergic to Pakistan allying with China. Finally the US wants to denuclearize Pakistan.

That is reason enough to remain enganged with Pakistan.
It has nothing to do with the reasons you stated. Its just how US operates in terms of foreign dignitaries. Indians deliberately throw the same shit again and you took the bait. Yes US is no Friend of ours but than again there are no permanent friends just permanent interests. As for nuclear US accept Pakistan a nuclear weapons country long ago even if they dont acknowledge publicly. This is why their rhetoric has almost died from our weapons getting into the hands of terrorists to the most dangerous country.
 
.
This was the same shit you Indians were spewing on IK first visit to the US without even knowing how official visits in the US are categorized and you are doing it again. PM is there to attend the UNG not on visit to US to meet Trump. Yet he has two appointments with US president. So your point is?


It has nothing to do with the reasons you stated. Its just how US operates in terms of foreign dignitaries. Indians deliberately throw the same shit again and you took the bait. Yes US is no Friend of ours but than again there are no permanent friends just permanent interests. As for nuclear US accept Pakistan a nuclear weapons country long ago even if they dont acknowledge publicly. This is why their rhetoric has almost died from our weapons getting into the hands of terrorists to the most dangerous country.

Whilst I agree with the Indian BS part, I beg to differ with the rest.

The US is unreliable. They are not our friends nor allies. Never have been and never will be.

1. The Americans disapprove of a nuclear Pakistan for a multitude of reason. The Americans like to have a subservient Pakistan. Basically a vasal state. Not a nuclear Pakistan that can defend itself. The US will never accept a nuclear Pakistan. A Muslim nation with a big population and a strong arms capabilities. That is a big NO NO.

2. The reason why the US state doesn't parrot the nukes falling into terrorist hands is because it uses that as a carrot and stick. Through unofficial channels it loves to spread this propaganda, but on an official level it has somewhat refrained from sensationalizing it.

If the Americans start doing this on an official level they will lose Pakistan in an instant. They cannot yet afford all out enmity and hostility with Pakistan. They require Pakistan, but this propaganda is eventually going to become mainstream when the time is right.
 
.
Whilst I agree with the Indian BS part, I beg to differ with the rest.

The US is unreliable. They are not our friends nor allies. Never have been and never will be.

1. The Americans disapprove of a nuclear Pakistan for a multitude of reason. The Americans like to have a subservient Pakistan. Basically a vasal state. Not a nuclear Pakistan that can defend itself. The US will never accept a nuclear Pakistan. A Muslim nation with a big population and a strong arms capabilities. That is a big NO NO.

2. The reason why the US state doesn't parrot the nukes falling into terrorist hands is because it uses that as a carrot and stick. Through unofficial channels it loves to spread this propaganda, but on an official level it has somewhat refrained from sensationalizing it.

If the Americans start doing this on an official level they will lose Pakistan in an instant. They cannot yet afford all out enmity and hostility with Pakistan. They require Pakistan, but this propaganda is eventually going to become mainstream when the time is right.
Most people who were aware of the developments of our nuclear program have always maintained that on some level US always knew Pakistan is making the bomb and if they wanted too they would had squashed our program in its infancy. Maybe it was the timing of the Afghan Jihad which forced US to look the other way or maybe they were never fully able to comprehend to the extent Pakistan would go to acquire nuclear capability. So if US did not or could not do anything (You can chose between did not or could not), today we are a declared nuclear power. What can they do now and they know it as well. All those preparations of assault and taking away nuclear weapons were nothing more than hollywood inspired fantasy BS. Heck they even showed that on one of their movies JI joe. In reality this is not possible and they cannot sanction us anymore as they do to Iran or North Korea because we are already a declared nuclear power. After accepting India as a nuclear weapons country, they further legitimize Pakistan even if they dont say it out loud.
 
.
Most people who were aware of the developments of our nuclear program have always maintained that on some level US always knew Pakistan is making the bomb and if they wanted too they would had squashed our program in its infancy. Maybe it was the timing of the Afghan Jihad which forced US to look the other way or maybe they were never fully able to comprehend to the extent Pakistan would go to acquire nuclear capability. So if US did not or could not do anything (You can chose between did not or could not), today we are a declared nuclear power. What can they do now and they know it as well. All those preparations of assault and taking away nuclear weapons were nothing more than hollywood inspired fantasy BS. Heck they even showed that on one of their movies JI joe. In reality this is not possible and they cannot sanction us anymore as they do to Iran or North Korea because we are already a declared nuclear power. After accepting India as a nuclear weapons country, they further legitimize Pakistan even if they dont say it out loud.

The Americans had a firm suspicion that we were developing nuclear weapons, but they were under the impression the process would be slow, tedious and too complex. They were stunned by the final outcome. Pakistan managed the improbable and against American expectations. For us it was a matter of survival after India gained the nukes. The Americans had underestimated Pakistan and this hurts them till this day.

The Americans have very reluctantly remained silent, but they are far from accepting. The reasons are well-known and I have summed them earlier. The Americans are in a stranglehold as far as Pakistan is concerned. They rely on Pakistan due to war in Afghanistan and cannot afford to agitate. The Americans don't have any options in Afghanistan, even though they like to pretend they do. The truth is that the Americans have always been in an uncertain and difficult position vis a vis Pakistan. They just have never been able to find an opportunity to start a full scale conflict. Apart from behind the scene proxy wars there has not been a direct confrontation.

The Americans are itching for opportunities and according to their own hawkish think-tanks they have a dozen reasons to do so. We shouldn't underestimate American displeasure at our nuclear capability. It is a real threat that must not be overlooked.
 
Last edited:
.
Its shocking to see no one from the white house was there to welcome the great IK.
to the idiot ....

Its is the standard protocol for UN general assembly sessions .... no one from white house receive any other dignitary as they are not on OFFICIAL VISIT to US but on the visit to attend UN session ....
 
. .
For "Mission Kashmir" he should have been heading to Srinagar instead of New York.
 
.
For "Mission Kashmir" he should have been heading to Srinagar instead of New York.
Sir G , "That Day" is not that far ……….. It is coming ……. We like it or not we have to fight …….. War will be imposed on us …….
If we still don't chose to fight then we will going to be way worse then Syria , Bosnia ………..
 
.
EFEFtdhXUAAhmfm
 
.
For "Mission Kashmir" he should have been heading to Srinagar instead of New York.
And you should have been fighting in Kashmir instead of waging internet jihad against Pakistan because you show so much concern for Kashmir in your every second post
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom