What's new

Illegal Migration to India - Loops And Holes In The Narrative

BanglaBhoot

RETIRED TTA
Joined
Apr 8, 2007
Messages
8,839
Reaction score
5
Country
France
Location
France
Bilal Mondal is an inmate in barrack number 6 in Mumbai’s Arthur Road jail. Arrested for being an illegal Bangladeshi immigrant, Mondal does not deny he is from the country. What he claims is that he came on a valid visa but overstayed, drawn by the lucrative wages offered by builders in the city.

Mondal is not the only ‘Bangladeshi’ languishing in Indian prisons. A diplomat at the Bangladesh High Commission in New Delhi, Enamul Hoque Chowdhury, confirms there are around 600 Bangladeshis in different Indian jails. But the extent of illegal immigration from Bangladesh, he insists, had gone down dramatically in the last two decades. Had it been a serious concern, he says, it would have been raised at ministerial-level meetings between the two countries.

The leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha, Arun Jaitley, however, holds that ‘foreigners’ constitute 60 to 80 per cent of the population in districts like Dhubri and Goalpara in Assam. Bijoya Chakrabarty, BJP member of the Lok Sabha from Guwahati, succeeded in stunning the House with her claim that Bangladeshis were already in a majority in 13 out of the 27 districts in the state.

While the issue of “illegal immigrants” has been raised routinely during elections in eastern states since the ’80s, there is little evidence to corroborate claims of large-scale migration. Whatever migration there was, it was neither in millions nor permanent in nature, as was discovered by the London-based editor (international operations) of BBC World Service, Nazes Afroz, who travelled extensively in Bangladesh and India to produce a series of programmes on the subject during 1999-2000.

page_23_20120903.jpg


The theory, he told Outlook this week, of large-scale migration then was supported neither by data nor evidence on the ground. Seasonal migration, he found, was common, triggered by demands from Indian land-owners for cheap labour; so was smuggling of cattle from India to Bangladesh. There were human trafficking rings, which also lured some people from border districts for “highly paid jobs” and took them to work in brick kilns as far as Haryana.

Agrees A.J. Philip, former director of the Pratichi Trust set up by Nobel laureate Amartya Sen. “Bangladesh has done much better than India on most social indices; it is far-fetched to believe that every poor Bangladeshi is longing to migrate to India,” he says.

Besides, 80 per cent of the over 4,000 km-long border is now double-fenced with barbed wire and flood-lit. Hundreds of border posts manned by armed Border Security Force personnel *** the landscape, with the Indian government resolving to reduce the gap between these posts from the current 3.5 km to 2.5 km. Riverine policing with speed boats and flood lights has also been introduced.

The problem, says human rights activist Harsh Dobhal after a visit to western Assam, is one of assimilation. Bengali Muslims, who may have settled half a century ago, “still do not speak Assamese, and that could well create doubts and distrust,” he says.

In any case, the current phase of xenophobia has succeeded in putting the Bengali-speaking Muslim in the dock. The vegetable vendor in Guwahati, the construction worker in Mumbai or the maid in Ghaziabad are again on notice to prove their nationality. But neither a ration card nor the voters’ identity card is proof enough in the prevailing mood, engineered by politicians and political parties.

Loops And Holes In The Narrative | Uttam Sengupta
 
You cannot stop determined people from coming to India. They will always find ways and means. Instead of worrying about fences we should help Bangladesh increase their national pie so everyone benefits from it. They already have higher HDI values and are only lagging behind in Per capita Income.

Few million Bangladeshis who are already here, should be given temporary asylum or green card. I think it is better to bring them
into open- that way we can determine how many are there in our country. They should be given a chance to become law abiding members of our society and contribute by paying taxes. We should set up immigration and naturalization service just like in US. We should charge fees for legal counseling and use this money for running this department.
 
You cannot stop determined people from coming to India. They will always find ways and means. Instead of worrying about fences we should help Bangladesh increase their national pie so everyone benefits from it. They already have higher HDI values and are only lagging behind in Per capita Income.

Few million Bangladeshis who are already here, should be given temporary asylum or green card. I think it is better to bring them
into open- that way we can determine how many are there in our country. They should be given a chance to become law abiding members of our society and contribute by paying taxes. We should set up immigration and naturalization service just like in US. We should charge fees for legal counseling and use this money for running this department.

Such a distorted self-perception. 99% of these "determined people" (aka dirt poor crowd) never even heard of Mumbai or Delhi. They want to go to Dubai man. Only smugglers go to India. :P
 
‘Prove we’re not Indians, we'll return to Bangladesh’


http://www.hindustantimes.com/India...-ll-return-to-Bangladesh/Article1-919432.aspx

Zia Haq, Hindustan Times
Chatrasal (Indo-Bangladesh border), August 25, 2012

Author’s Blog
First Published: 23:57 IST(25/8/2012)
Last Updated: 23:59 IST(25/8/2012)

Along this fenced international border, Bangladesh is both a myth and reality. It does exist on the other side, but nobody wants to acknowledge its existence due to the fear of being dubbed an illegal migrant. Twenty-three-year-old Nekib Husain has spiked hair, Bollywood-inspired looks


and a chunky wristwatch. His phone alternates between Aircel, an Indian telecom firm, and that of a Banglalink Telecom radio signal provider.

Arsan Ahmed, in sharp contrast, is scrawny and sports a jaded lungi. Despite staying metres away from Bangladesh, both insist that they have no idea about a country their forefathers came from.

“How do I know what Bangladesh is like? I don’t even know where it is,” Ahmed says. He is lying, of course.

People from his village, as well as others in the vicinity, queue up at the border gate at 7 am every day, waiting it to be flung open.

The international border runs through people’s homes and farmlands. So, many farmers like Ahmed cross over to work in their lands after showing official residence certificates and signing registers kept with Border Security Force (BSF) personnel.

“We have registered land ownership papers, but people still allege that we are Bangladeshis,” Ahmed's brother, Faizul, says. “So, we prefer not to talk. If you prove we are Bangladeshis, we will go back. But prove it first.”

BSF company commandant Ras Narayan Rai says that claims of illegal migration are exaggerated. “What are we here for?” he asks. But, despite these assertions, anti-migrant activists in Assam say a faulty law scrapped by the SC has helped thousands of migrants become “naturalised”.
 
Migrants issue skirted in Bangladesh talks


Migrants issue skirted in Bangladesh talks - The Times of India

Rakhi Chakrabarty, TNN | Aug 26, 2012, 04.08AM IST

NEW DELHI: The ethnic conflagration in lower Assam has put the spotlight yet again on illegal migration, with Bodo outfits and other political parties calling it the root cause for unrest in the state that threatens to spill over. Yet, illegal migration from Bangladesh ceased to figure as a problem in talks between India and its eastern neighbour since 1992.

Neither the Congress-led UPA nor the BJP-led NDA government at the Centre raised the "problem" with Bangladesh, said sources in the MEA and the Bangladesh government.

Veena Sikri, ex-Indian high commissioner to Dhaka, said, "When former Bangladeshi PM Khaleda Zia came to India in 1992, illegal migration was discussed formally. It was recognized as a problem and both countries agreed to work towards a solution." In bilateral documents since then, illegal migration was replaced with "cross-border illegal movement", a formulation which would suggest downplaying of an issue that roiled Assam in the 1980s. Bangladeshi foreign minister Dipu Moni recently told an Indian TV channel that illegal migration is not a point of bilateral conflict as it "hasn't been raised with us, at least not in the recent past".

"On the sidelines of talks with Bangladesh, India has mentioned illegal migration but has not produced clinching evidence," said former Intelligence Bureau special director R N Ravi, who handled north-east.

What exactly is the magnitude of the illegal migration of Bangladesh? Nobody knows. "I don't know the exact number of Bangladeshi nationals in Bodoland, but neither does the state government," said Urkhao Gwra Brahma, a senior Bodo leader and former RS MP.

Home ministry figures offer no help. According to them, 591 infiltrators were arrested between January and July 31, 2012. Of them, 22 were caught in Assam, a far cry from the hordes which BJP, AGP and Bodos allege enter Assam each month. On the contrary, 936 were arrested while trying to sneak into Bangladesh from India.

"Nobody has done a dispassionate study to find out the scale of migration. It's a highly emotive issue that recurs in political rhetoric," said Ravi.

Other experts agree illegal migration has been politicized, but not addressed. Sikri said, "Bangladesh is in denial and there are no clear positions within India on the issue. India needs to quantify the problem in the interest of good bilateral relation".


The diminished salience of the problem in bilateral dialogue contrasts with the importance political parties like BJP and AGP attach to it. BJP president on Thursday repeated Assam riots marked a "clash between Indians and foreigners".

Brahma said, "There was no sudden en masse migration from Bangladesh before the riots. Root cause of the recent clashes is not just Bangladeshi migrants but also non-tribals moving to Bodoland from the rest of India. Tribals have become a minority in their own land."

However, Bodoland Territorial Council chief Hagrama Mohilary blamed Bangladesh migrants for the conflict.

Ravi said migration from Bangladesh is a continuing phenomenon. "While the issue of Bangladeshi migration remains unaddressed, the Assam government has been practicing the politics of ethno-exclusivism. This has stoked the latent fear of the "other" among subaltern communities," said Ravi.

Till the Centre and the state practice inclusive politics, the recent ethnic cleansing in Assam won't be the last, he warned.
 
A Foreign Hand From The East

Communally-inclined parties find Bangladeshis a rallying factor

Saba Naqvi, Debarshi Dasgupta, Toral Varia Deshpande



Who is an illegal immigrant?

According to the Assam Accord of 1985, people from Bangladesh who had come over before January 1966 were to be regularised as Indian nationals. Those who came over between 1966 and March 24, 1971, were to become eligible for citizenship after 10 years of detection. Those who arrived after March 24, 1971, were to be detected and deported.

Are all Bengali-speaking Muslims Bangladeshis?

No. West Bengal (25%), Assam (30%), Tripura have large populations of Bengali-speaking Muslims. Inter-state migration takes place all the time.

***

From the eastern border to the western coast, the enemy has apparently been found: the Bangladeshi Muslim. As the domino effect from Assam is felt across India, the demonology only needs to be updated and tweaked to the most recent explosion on the Muslim faultline. This time, the Muslim bogeyman returns in the shape of the “Bangladeshi”. The immigrant, illegal migrant, settler, foreigner—there are several terms for him in a debate that has already communalised the national discourse and suggests a return to identity politics. It’s the small players like Raj Thackeray in Mumbai and Badruddin Ajmal in Assam who are key actors in the process; both nurturing votebanks based on differing identities. But the national parties are also picking up the cues.

Bangladeshi migrants have always been an issue for the BJP which it keeps raising periodically at a national level and with greater intensity in sensitive localities where polarisation is perceived to have a favourable impact on electoral outcomes. So as Assam descended into chaos, the BJP’s national leaders came up with the expected analysis. L.K. Advani said the illegal migrants were at the heart of the problem. Narendra Modi said they present a security threat to India; his words, in fact, are worth deconstructing: “The infiltration of Bangladeshis is becoming an issue of concern. The Assam violence is just a small example of it but the issue is becoming a major problem for the nation. The people in the country are keen to find a solution to the problem and it is for the PM to spell out a policy. The country wants to know what you think about it. Will the Bangladeshi infiltrators be allowed a sway over the country?” The man expected to have a major role in the national campaign of the BJP in the 2014 general elections has nuanced his position carefully. Bangladeshis were not to be seen as people searching for jobs, land and livelihood in Assam; they were “infiltrators” threatening all of India.

In Mumbai last week, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chief Raj Thackeray addressed a huge rally and in the course of a long speech held up a Bangladeshi passport with great flourish. “They all came from outside Maharashtra,” he said, referring to a controversial protest on August 11 by some Muslim groups about the community’s plight in Assam and Burma, which turned violent. “Whoever came here had no connection with Maharashtra. After everything that went down here that day, this passport was found, a Bangladeshi passport. This was found right here. A single-entry passport (visa) which is needed only to come into India. Clearly, the passport holder had no intentions of going back, so it was thrown away here.”

The BJP-MNS rhetoric assumes significance because it comes at a time when these forces are in the ascendant, and Congress fortunes are in decline. Forty-eight hours after Raj’s show of strength, the Congress-NCP regime in Maharashtra succumbed to the demand for the transfer of Mumbai police commissioner Arup Patnaik for failing to act strongly against those who went on a rampage in Azad Maidan. “Raj has an impeccable sense of timing,” says senior political analyst and Loksatta executive editor Girish Kuber. “He is spreading his influence to the whole of Maharashtra to dominate the slot of a strong opposition party in the state. In that context, the rally was a perfectly timed move.” The BJP and Shiv Sena too had tried to organise protests against the Aug 11 incidents, but could attract only a few thousand each as opposed to the 45,000 who turned up for Raj.

Ever since its birth on March 9, 2006, Raj Thackeray’s MNS has been propagating the “sons of the soil” agenda, much like the Shiv Sena, his learning ground. The parent party has at various points found different targets—south Indians, north Indians, Indian Muslims, the Pakistani cricket team. The MNS had in 2008 run a violent campaign against migrants from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. Now, all the ire has turned against the Bangladeshi. After all, he does make the perfect enemy—Muslim and foreign—for parties in search of a polarising agenda.

Such politics may appear unattractive to some, but it has an appeal that needs to be understood. “Raj could get a response on this issue where other parties failed,” says Sakal Group political editor Prakash Akolkar, “because he took up the issues of police morale, migrants and security of the citizens in a way that people could relate to. For many citizens, Hindu or Muslim, these are issues which affect them directly.” Even before Raj broke away from the Sena, it is said that he had made a short film on migrants and showed it to uncle Bal Thackeray. “Long before this issue resurfaced, we had issued instructions to all our corporators and councillors to keep a watch on Bangladeshi immigrants,” says MNS general secretary Nitin Sardesai. Not to be outdone, Samajwadi Party leader Abu Azmi has offered Raj Rs 2 crore if he proves his voters in his Govandi-Shivaji Nagar constituency include Bangladeshis. Azmi had also given Rs 1.5 lakh to the family of one of the two Muslim youths who were killed in the police firing at Azad Maidan.

In Assam, Muslims of Bengali origin have become the votebank of a party that caters exclusively to the minority community. Back in 2006, Tarun Gogoi had reportedly asked, “Who is Badruddin Ajmal?”, when asked about a possible alliance with his party, the All-India United Democratic Front (AIUDF). Today, the Assam chief minister knows of Ajmal all too well. The recent violence in Bodoland has helped reinforce Ajmal’s credentials with his voters. With 18 MLAs, AIUDF is already Assam’s leading opposition party. The ‘All-India’ is a recent addition, a reflection of its growing national ambitions. As Ajmal asked for Gogoi’s dismissal, the CM—who some believe has played a more sophisticated version of the BJP card—retorted: “I wish Ajmal good luck. He has been seeking Allah’s blessings to remove me from the CM’s post.”

A graduate in Islamic theology from Deoband, Ajmal’s official profile lists “religious discourse and Islamic theological exchanges” among his favourite pastimes. A perfume moghul with expansive business and charitable interests, Ajmal is believed to be perfectly capable of raising a stink when it suits his political interests. For someone whose political fortunes have been built exploiting Muslim victimhood, the conflict in Assam allows him a chance to spread his net wider. He and his party have sharpened their rhetoric by insisting on a summary dissolution of the Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC) and claiming that “90 per cent of the victims (of this round of violence) are Muslims”. “For someone who came up on nothing but the minority plank, he had to seize the opportunity to become their sole spokesperson and woo the Muslims away from the Congress in Assam,” says Nilim Dutta, the operational head of Strategic Research and Analysis Organisation in Guwahati. “Defending the minorities is one thing, but making needlessly provocative comments which could exacerbate an already volatile situation is quite another. His comments are now going to be used by the Hindu right against Muslims.” Already, many, including the BJP and groupings of Assamese-speaking Muslims, have called for Ajmal’s arrest.

While arguing that Ajmal’s political strategy is a response to the unfolding crisis, former head of the political science department at Gauhati University Monirul Hussain says that he may have overstepped the line by repeatedly calling for a dissolution of the BTC. “By doing this, he has added fuel to the fire,” says Hussain. “He could have talked about reforming the BTC, making it more inclusive instead of its dissolution.” Meanwhile, Bodoland People’s Front MLA Pradeep Brahma was arrested on August 23 for his role in the violence. He has been accused of shooting at Muslims from a Bolero vehicle.

Walter Fernandes, a senior fellow at the Guwahati-based North Eastern Social Research Centre, says the AIUDF owes its existence to the propaganda of an invasion by migrants from Bangladesh. “This makes the Muslims live in fear, because of which they’ll go to anybody who offers them protection under a Muslim fundamentalist flag,” he says. “What we need to do is counter this phenomenon and create a secular space.”

That, political compulsion and experience suggest, may be a real challenge. Significant elections loom in communally sensitive states like Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Karnataka (all with a direct BJP-Congress contest) leading up to the 2014 general elections. It’s not as though the national parties are hell-bent on having a bloodbath, since both are currently confronted with big problems. The BJP can never forget that Atal Behari Vajpayee believed the polarisation triggered by the 2002 Gujarat riots was a major reason for their electoral defeat in 2004. But it certainly suits the party to nuance the anti-Muslim card carefully to galvanise cadres, cut across caste differences or revive waning popular support in particular regions. Modi, for instance, wants to live down the Gujarat carnage and be known more as the economic growth/development man. Yet, he must always keep the faith and turn the pitch of the identity issue up or down depending on the audience and the requirement. That’s politics. For the Congress, its regime being quite discredited already, a charged situation could perhaps help it keep the splintering Muslim vote behind it in pockets; it would also divert attention from other failures. To add to the declining public morality of national players, there is the emergence of fundamentalist Muslim groups both in the political arena and in cyberspace, who also thrive on spreading fear and perpetuating victimhood.

The subcontinent’s political map, after all, was forged in the bloodbath of identity politics that led to the creation of Pakistan and ultimately Bangladesh. There was a great eye-for-an-eye blindness to the entire exercise whose price we continue to pay. Consider the subcontinental theatre at the time when Assam has become the cradle of India’s gravest humanitarian crisis. Hindus are trying to flee Pakistan to come to India (they are supposedly welcome because they are not Muslims), and there has always been an influx of economic refugees from Bangladesh that has fuelled politics and mayhem in Assam. In the midst of all this was the strange exodus of terrified people from the Northeast who left relatively safe Indian cities to return to a homeland in chaos. Their flight, more than anything else, revealed their fragility and lack of integration with mainstream India. It’s a sad twist of fate that those determined to stay are afraid, and those who flee are also so afraid.

Secular India must confront the fact that a nation built so proudly on the principle of rejecting the two-nation theory is still engaged with fiercely debating the issue of insider/outsider. The rhetoric again stokes the subliminal fear of the invader, the immigrant, the fifth columnist, the traitor among us. These are often the poorest of the poor, engaged in the menial tasks locals are unwilling to do. But the Bangladeshis (often a euphemism for Muslim) have long been depicted as a people who threaten to swamp us, who keep coming in wave upon wave.

A Foreign Hand From The East | Saba Naqvi
 
I think the thread article should finally settle the question about alleged illegal immigration from Bangladesh.
 
I thought petrol is cheaper in Bangladesh! Why would anyone go to india to buy ?
 
^^^Sometimes they come to graze cattle and then tend to graze themselves for years!!:laugh:The fence along the Indo-Bangla border should be as well guarded as the LoC and even one single Bangladeshi should not be allowed in!!
 
I am glad that Indian Muslims are multiplying very fast and hope that they become a great force in near future.

Hail Indian Muslims.
 
You can watch here, not from Indian media.


It has been told and proved several time that was a propaganda video and the people were likely Indian themselves.... n assam- bangladesh border is one of the most guarded one that no one can just walk in as depicted in the picture and smiling when caught.

The biggest blunder was the petrol part... Petrol is hugely cheaper in Bangladeh then India and a big part is smuggled to India itself... have you forgot the protest in India few months back for the rise of petrol price ???

Petrol costlier in India than in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, US - Money - DNA

According to the reply by Minister of State for Petroleum RPN Singh, one litre of petrol costs Rs48.64 in Pakistan, Rs52.42 in Bangladesh and Rs61.38 in Sri Lanka. In India, the fuel costs Rs66.42, despite oil marketing companies reducing prices Nov 16.

Why should some one spend 22 taka more to buy petrol going into India???

Another propaganda busted...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom