What's new

If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why

Who.Cares

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
224
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
If no-one helps you after a car crash in India, this is why
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36446652

By Preeti JhaDelhi

_89897725_cdcfcc3d-fac8-4c3b-9de7-9ed5bf4a0ace.jpg


When a road accident occurs, bystanders will usually try to help the injured, or at least call for help. In India it's different. In a country with some of the world's most dangerous roads, victims are all too often left to fend for themselves.

Kanhaiya Lal desperately cries for help but motorists swerve straight past him. His young son and the splayed bodies of his wife and infant daughter lie next to the mangled motorbike on which they had all been travelling seconds earlier.

The widely broadcast CCTV footage of this scene - showing the suffering of a family of hit-and-run victims in northern India in 2013 and the apparent indifference of passers-by - troubled many Indians.

Some motorcyclists and police eventually came to the family's aid but it was too late for Lal's wife and daughter. Their deaths sparked a nationwide debate over the role of bystanders - the media hailed it as a "new low in public apathy" and worse, "the day humanity died".

But what safety campaigner Piyush Tewari saw wasn't a lack of compassion but an entire system stacked against helping road victims.

_89897719_tewari_rolex976.jpg
Image copyrightROLEX AWARDS/JESS HOFFMAN
Image captionPiyush Tewari's own loss spurred him into action
His work to change this began nearly 10 years ago, when his 17-year-old cousin was knocked down on the way home from school.

"A lot of people stopped but nobody came forward to help," Tewari says. "He bled to death on the side of the road."

Tewari set out to understand this behaviour, and found the same pattern repeated time and again across the country. Passers-by who could have helped were holding back and doing nothing.

"The foremost reason was intimidation by police," he says.

"Oftentimes if you assist someone the police will assume you're helping that person out of guilt."

The discovery spurred Tewari to set up SaveLIFE. In a 2013 survey, the foundation found that 74% of Indians were unlikely to help an accident victim, whether alone or with other bystanders.

Apart from the fear of being falsely implicated, people also worried about becoming trapped as a witness a court case - legal proceedings can be notoriously protracted in India. And if they helped the victim get to hospital, they thought they would come under pressure to stump up fees for medical treatment.

_89897726_6a72f8d2-eefd-4207-9cd9-76e3063d3ea7.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
In a country with smoothly functioning emergency services, bystanders often need to do little more than call an ambulance, do their best to provide first aid and reassure victims that help is on the way.

But in India ambulances are in short supply, sometimes very slow to arrive and often poorly equipped. This makes it a country in need of Good Samaritans - and according to Tewari there are many Good Samaritans out there. They just choose carefully when to leap into action.

He contrasts the reluctance of passers-by to help victims of road accidents with their response to train crashes or bombs blasts.

In these cases, he says, "before the police or media arrives everybody's been moved to hospital".

The big difference with road accidents is that there are usually just one or two victims. "The chances of getting blamed are much higher," he says.

SaveLIFE filed a case with India's top court to introduce legal protection for Indian bystanders and a year ago there was a breakthrough when the Supreme Court issued a number of guidelines, including:

  • allowing people who call to alert emergency services about a crash to remain anonymous
  • providing them with immunity from criminal liability
  • forbidding hospitals from demanding payment from a bystander who takes an injured person to hospital
Just two months later, though, another hit-and-run incident caught on camera shocked the nation.

_89876942_4l4a3336.jpg

Image captionFootage of the crash that killed Vinay Jindal went viral
"See how they're just watching?" murmurs Anita Jindal as she scans the CCTV footage, once again, on her mobile phone in the cramped room-cum-corner shop she once shared with her son, Vinay.

A speeding car had hurled 20-year-old Vinay off his scooter in east Delhi, and the footage shows a crowd of onlookers surrounding him, and doing nothing.

It went viral on social media last July, triggering a new bout of soul-searching, and was even mentioned by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his monthly radio broadcast to the nation.

_89877555_d93020f3-84f7-4c14-bddc-248d8abba9a8.jpg
Image copyrightAP
Image captionAnita Jindal is angry that no one helped her son Vinay
"If someone had helped he may have been here today," says Anita Jindal. "Everyone told me they were scared of the police."

For Piyush Tewari and SaveLIFE the struggle goes on.

In March the Supreme Court guidelines were declared compulsory. To ensure that they will be enforced, the foundation is now campaigning to get each of India's 29 federal states and seven union territories to enshrine them in a Good Samaritan law.

The scale of the problem
_89877552_gettyimages-527562422.jpg
Image copyrightGETTY IMAGES
  • Fifteen people are killed every hour in road accidents in India
  • Twenty children are killed every day in road accidents in India
  • One million people have died in road accidents in India in the past decade
  • Five million people were seriously injured or disabled in road accidents in the India in the past decade
  • The equivalent of three per cent of GDP is lost annually due to road accidents
Source: SaveLIFE Foundation, 2014

Shrijith Ravindran, the chief executive of a restaurant chain, is one person for whom this legislation cannot be introduced soon enough.

In January he came across an elderly man bleeding by the roadside in the western Indian city of Pune. A gathering crowd of people was still deliberating what to do when Ravindran put the man in his car and drove him to hospital.

The closest hospital gave him a bunch of papers to fill in before turning him away.

The next one swamped him with more paperwork before tending to the patient.

In total, he says, he spent three hours filling in these forms.

"They ask, 'Are you a relative?' The moment you say 'No', they don't do anything," says Ravindran.

"They wait for somebody to give them assurance that they will pay the bill. Valuable time is lost."

The elderly man finally received treatment once the paperwork was completed, but it was too late. He died of his injuries.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topic title from BBC main page
d854073d628f438594613edad324816f.png
 
.
India is not in the title .. :)
anyway good that they are finally bringing good samaritan law.. even with law, in situation when you are in public and need help, just dont assume one would. The bystander effect is universal. Point at one person who can see you and loudly ask specific person to help.
 
.
Shocking really

India is not in the title .. :)
anyway good that they are finally bringing good samaritan law.. even with law, in situation when you are in public and need help, just dont assume one would. The bystander effect is universal. Point at one person who can see you and loudly ask specific person to help.

Not in traffic accidents, It's not universal, No.. I have never ever seen anybody standing by without helping in a devastating traffic accident
 
.
Shocking really



Not in traffic accidents, It's not universal, No.. I have never ever seen anybody by standing in an devastating traffic accident
I have never seen a devastating traffic accidents .. ever in my life.. apparently they do occur.
 
.
I have never seen a devastating traffic accidents .. ever in my life.. apparently they do occur.

They do and people dont stand by watching like how you attempted portray here, So it's not a universal effect, People rush to help others in desperate need in most other countries

It's not fair to generalize social ills in one particular country on others just because it may seem offensive to you
 
Last edited:
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect


The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases in which individuals do not offer any means of help to a victim when other people are present. The probability of help is inversely related to the number of bystanders. In other words, the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help. Several variables help to explain why the bystander effect occurs. These variables include: ambiguity, cohesiveness and diffusion of responsibility.
 
.
This may be true.

After a bomb blast, I saw all people help each other spontaneously and local clubs and taxi drivers volunteered to transport injured to hospitals. Happened 150 m from me. In half an hour, all the injured were removed - without police support.

On the other hand, I saw a motorbike hit by a truck - with the skull of the driver broken into two and the one who sat behind had his right leg crushed but alive. The locals made a circle and watched them die, keeping a 'respectable' distance. Of course, a couple of local guys got time to commandeer a bike to (successfully) chase down the offending truck driver!

This is not lack of sympathy. This is due to something else.

This is applicable only in case of serious and fatal injuries. If the victims are lightly injured, they readily get help!
 
. .
NO people in here mostly dont help because of the Laws that gets attached with it. People fear if they help, then police will come and ask questions, followed by court dates one after another. What India needs is good law for traffic accident
 
.
Well may well be the case in India because of it's population, It's a massively over crowded country any way, But the by stander effect by no way can be construed as a universal phenomenon
 
.
@WAJsal Please restore the thread's title to its original form. Thanks.

Yes it is pretty common knowledge that helping out a victim in road accident can spell a lot of trouble for you, especially if its a hit & run case. But nowadays it is less and less common in the cities, rural areas not so much.

Even in cities it is not exactly peachy as you will have to testify on at least one or two occasions, which means day/s lost over nothing.
 
.

My point stands.. It's not universal, It's a more common occurrence in highly populated countries, Bystander effect that is.. China also being one

And posting random video's of such may well be rare instances also does not make it a common phenomena either

@WAJsal Please restore the thread's title to its original form. Thanks.

Yes it is pretty common knowledge that helping out a victim in road accident can spell a lot of trouble for you, especially if its a hit & run case. But nowadays it is less and less common in the cities, rural areas not so much.

Even in cities it is not exactly peachy as you will have to testify on at least one or two occasions, which means day/s lost over nothing.

Well i guess thats one reason for such apathy, Maybe another reason is how common accidents are, Indian roads are notorious for bad road discipline, I have had first hand experience And having driven in places like Sri Lanka where road rules are seldom respected, thats says a lot.. Indian drivers make Sri Lankan bus and three wheeler drivers look like Germans
 
. .
Not in traffic accidents, It's not universal, No.. I have never ever seen anybody standing by without helping in a devastating traffic accident

It happens, there are 2 reasons

1) In fatal accidents most of the motorist doesnt know what to do , or looking at the scene most of them (including me) get into a shock and will not be in a position to respond
2) The Indian police, Normally if you take them to hospital, there are likely chances that you will be harassed and even you will be charged for creating the accident.....

I have had enough experience on the road, as my job involves lot of travel.
1)Have helped 2 couples, who met with accident (colliding each other) and the inuries where not fatal (few fractures), took 4 of them to hospital in my car, and put them in to causality ward
2) Have seen a highway accident, Volvo bus banging behind a parked truck (3 to 4 rows were totally damaged) and i was in spot with few minutes, The emergency services guys were asking for help, and they literally pulled me, but i couldnt do anything as i was shell shocked......It took me few days to come out of that shock
3) While travelling in night around 1 am i had noticed a car parked in the centre of a highway with movement inside it, (was travelling in a bus sitting next to the driver seat) Have asked the driver to park the bus and see, We both went and saw that a car met with an accident with a truck (not seen anywhere) and the driver and passenger had injuries and were unconscious, the bus was parked in such a way that the entire highway was blocked so that more guys come for help..... by that time local people came and police and ambulance were alerted...... We left the scene without waiting for them as we created enough crowd including locals for taking care of it....

But one thing i hate people do is, taking pictures......... I have seen people taking pictures of such shocking accident and share it.... Do not know what they get from that and i some how could not understand their mind
 
.
I have never seen a devastating traffic accidents .. ever in my life.. apparently they do occur.
you must consider you self lucky. However i wonder how you came to conclusion that the thing you called "bystander effect" is a universal thing?
that was quite lame!
Specially the way you tried to portray the picture here and the "i don't believe so" attitude here. Surprising to see this from a senior member.
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom