If India & China go on war who will win?

[waz]

You have your opinions ; I have mine

But facts speak for themselves

I really want to know ; WHAT PREVENTS China and Pakistan to attack India

What is it that your Government and Army Knows but you do not know
about India's capabilities

Fair enough, but I'm giving you base realities, as opposed to your optimistic predictions.
My government? The UK's friendly with both China and India. If you mean Pakistan, I don't know.

If you think carefully and Deeply
1962 LED to Pakistan's overconfidence and defeat in 1965

For India ; just a huge turn around in just Three years was Awesome

It did lead to overconfidence, but the war was a stalemate as per the vast majority of sources written on the war.

 

[aswin]

wake me up.. wen we have a war

 

[Ocean]

Super power Bangladesh will win.

 

[manlion]

a 2 front war will spell India's ultimate demise and disintegration.

Pakistan engage with India to take over S Kashmir while China can retake S Tibet.

Divided into several countries, India will not be in a position to confront China and peace will prevail in S Asia

 

[jetray]

China has an overwhelming superiority on all fronts, and has a defence industry that produces everything they need. There is no contest.

Just check the map of china and see how far lhasa is from beijing. Maintaining a supply line for continuous war will become very hard for them. Thats the reason they backed off in 1962. They can use ballistic missiles but that will all out war and will cause a lot of damage to both sides.

 

[waz]

Just check the map of china and see how far lhasa is from beijing. Maintaining a supply line for continuous war will become very hard for them. Thats the reason they backed off in 1962. They can use ballistic missiles but that will all out war and will cause a lot of damage to both sides.

That's why they are churning out transport craft and building infrastructure to bride that gap.

https://jamestown.org/program/china-and-indias-border-infrastructure-race/

Read under China.

Yes there will be damage to both sides, but India will face utter defeat.

 

[武成王]

I hope things escalate, though i do not foresee the PLA penetrating into India beyond 100km of the LAC.
Afterall, the main objective is to liberate South Tibet.
Time to settle the boundary question once n 4 all.

South Tibet is not the final goal, the dispute itself is a long term strategy to gather partners together. BD has too many population compared with their land, but BD itself has no the capability to get what it want, same logic can more or less apply to Pakistan and Myanmar. China don't need more land, only need a disintegrated India and stronger partners around India. This is a long term plan, and depend on global environment, patience is required.

 

[Hamza913]

China.

Hindustan has always been more concerned with countering Pakistan than China. As a result, Hindustan's ability to counter China is severely lacking.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

Just check the map of china and see how far lhasa is from beijing. Maintaining a supply line for continuous war will become very hard for them. Thats the reason they backed off in 1962. They can use ballistic missiles but that will all out war and will cause a lot of damage to both sides.

We have Y-20 strategic transport from now on, since it's made in China we can build this by hundred, and you can be sure that our supply line will have FedEx overnight service.

 

[ito]

The Himalayan mountain range between India and China will make tanks and fighter jets redundant...even navies are redundant given the strengths of each navy in its neighborhood and the sea distance between the countries...that leave soldiers fighting with guns with each other...and in extreme case ballistic missiles.

 

[jetray]

That's why they are churning out transport craft and building infrastructure to bride that gap. Yes there will be damage to both sides, but India will face utter defeat.

Yes thats right but infra can be easily destroyed and once winter sets in the passes will be blocked. Once infra is neutralized odds will even out as it. India will not face utter defeat as its economic hinterland is far away from the battlefield and the economic activity will still continue. It will be the same case for china as well.

Its only the all out war using missiles that will lead will lead to disaster for both sides as any attack on populated cities will lead to heavy causalities. Again here it will be who will cause the max damage, china wont fight a war for the same reason India doesnt fight a war with pakistan.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

We are not greedy for your land...Why would we be in your land ? What we stand on is not chinese land.

Oh Really, what happen If we did the same as India did with Bhutan by signing a security guarantor treaty with Pakistan, and enter J&K claiming that's not India's Land...LMAO, sometime people will have to learn to taste it own medicine to wake up.

 

[Ajaxpaul]

Oh Really, what happen If we did the same as India did with Bhutan by signing a security guarantor treaty with Pakistan, and enter J&K claiming that's not India's Land...LMAO, sometime people will have to learn to taste it own medicine to wake up.

What was stopping you ? You can sign with pakistan and NK. They are your best friends.

India had a treaty with ussr.

 

[jetray]

The Himalayan mountain range between India and China will make tanks and fighter jets redundant...even navies are redundant given the strengths of each navy in its neighborhood and the sea distance between the countries...that leave soldiers fighting with guns with each other...and in extreme case ballistic missiles.

exactly, odds get evened out and holding the ground will be very hard. Instead of fighting a conventional war if we use to guerrila warfare then impact on our economy will less. We can do the same thing wat pakistan is doing and that shouldnt be hard.

 

[Kiss_of_the_Dragon]

What was stopping you ? You can sign with pakistan and NK. They are your best friends.

India had a treaty with ussr.

And that's the very reason that you can stop us over CPEC even without the treaty.