What's new

If a Muslim can head RAW , can a Hindu ever be DG ISI?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well not at the moment. But many non muslims have served in higher posts in the past and there was not much hue and cry. Even today some non muslims are serving in the armed forces, but this hushed up.

Like????? President? Prime Minister? Vice-president? Chief Of Army staff? DG-ISI? Four Star General? Finance Minister? Leader Of Opposition? Speaker of Parliament?
 
That proves Indian Nationalist Muslim are spiritually weak Muslims who are more like agnostic.

so a good muslim should not be a nationalistic? Are you nationalistic Pakistani? You are not a good muslim either.
 
Looks like bhartis need a distraction from the situation in their country. If you guys spend even 10% of the energy that you spend bashing Pakistan, you could bring down the number of rapes in India from one every 20 min to one every 2 hours.
 
When he was a judge, at that time the population of hindus was 12%, there was no other such high post job available to any hindu. Whereas proportionately, muslims have higher category jobs back in India.

You idiot during that time Hindu population was the same

It was during Musharrfa era he was made SC judge
 
It did not take long for Indians to derail the thread. :rolleyes:
 
Looks like bhartis need a distraction from the situation in their country. If you guys spend even 10% of the energy that you spend bashing Pakistan, you could bring down the number of rapes in India from one every 20 min to one every 2 hours.

off topic...

any NON-MUSLIM President? Prime Minister? Vice-president? Chief Of Army staff? DG-ISI? Four Star General? Finance Minister? Leader Of Opposition? Speaker of Parliament?
..... ANY?
 
off topic...

any NON-MUSLIM President? Prime Minister? Vice-president? Chief Of Army staff? DG-ISI? Four Star General? Finance Minister? Leader Of Opposition? Speaker of Parliament?
..... ANY?

This thread went off topic when bhartis started Pakistan bashing.

And again, we don't need to prove anything to you. If you do t like it then you can sit in the corner and cry if you want
 
What a dumb comparison. Pakistan has about a 3% minority population so why would you expect all these top slots to go to them? India on the other hand has what? 20, 25% minorities. And like ice wolf said, Muslim are woefully underrepresented.
Nice try at trolling tho, maybe next time you will succeed

What's the logic here. If minorities are 3/5%, then they should still be represented in that proportion, if we were to go by your logic. What difference does 15% (in India) make? They would still be a minority & like in most democracies can always be outvoted by the majority. The story here is in the acceptance of minorities in high offices. It is even more note worthy when you put it in context of the partition & 2NT or even a bloody insurgency just a little over 2 decades ago when the example of the PM or the CoAS comes up. Such acceptance rarely happens, even in what are considered the more developed democracies of the west. Otherwise the U.S. would not have gone ga-ga over the election of Obama who is as equal a white as he is a black & who had to frequently & continuously fight allegations that he was a Muslim.

A little bit of appreciating that couldn't hurt, could it?
 
You idiot during that time Hindu population was the same

It was during Musharrfa era he was made SC judge

He was a sesssion judge in 69, he joined supreme court in 2000.
 
Imagine a Hindu DG ISI.

Imagine an Ahmadi prime minister.

Imagine a Sikh foreign minister.

Imagine.
I think our imaginations are running wild! Where Muslims are concerned, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews and Christians are non believers and infidels who need to be put to the sword! So how can they ever dream of placing them in the highest and most sensitive offices of governance in Pakistan? That's impossible!

Imagine a Hindu as Pakistan's PM!!! :woot: It's downright silly to even suggest it! :P
 
I think people are confusing between RAW and IB.
 
What's the logic here. If minorities are 3/5%, then they should still be represented in that proportion, if we were to go by your logic. What difference does 15% (in India) make? They would still be a minority & like in most democracies can always be outvoted by the majority. The story here is in the acceptance of minorities in high offices. It is even more note worthy when you put it in context of the partition & 2NT or even a bloody insurgency just a little over 2 decades ago when the example of the PM or the CoAS comes up. Such acceptance rarely happens, even in what are considered the more developed democracies of the west. Otherwise the U.S. would not have gone ga-ga over the election of Obama who is as equal a white as he is a black & who had to frequently & continuously fight allegations that he was a Muslim.

A little bit of appreciating the fact couldn't hurt, could it?

So basically you people are butt hurt because 3% of the population is not running the country. So let me ask you this, why not the same outrage at the lack of Indian PMs in UK? Or how about Muslim Presidents in France?
Those two countries have over 10% minorities. And of course there is India itself.
You guys don't actually care about the ground realities. You just want to have a mental masturbation session by comparing what you think India is better at vs Pakistan.

So spare the crocodile tears for the women of india, they need it more
 
When will India get a Muslim Prime Minister who is the real string puller.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom