What's new

ICBM with 5,500-km range can be developed in three years: DRDO

Contrarian

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
11,571
Reaction score
4
ICBM with 5,500-km range can be developed in three years: DRDO

NEW DELHI, APR 13 (PTI)

With the successful launch of the nuclear-capable Agni-III, India has achieved the capability to develop an inter-continental ballistic missile to strike at targets 5,500 km away within the next two to three years, top defence scientists said today.

"We have achieved the capability to make missiles with a range of 3,500 km to 5,500 km but the decision (to develop an ICBM) has to be taken by the political leadership," Defence Research and Development Organisation chief M Natarajan said here.

"DRDO scientists are working on miniaturising the systems of the Agni-III so that a third stage can be squeezed into the 16-metre-long missile to enable it to go up to 5,500 km with the same 1.5-tonne payload," Natarajan said a day after the first successful launch of the 3,000-km Agni-III.

Agni-III will also be converted into a submarine-launched ballistic missile to open more second-strike options for the country, DRDO scientists told reporters during a briefing.

Pointing out that Agni-III had been tested to almost its full range of 3,000 km, mission director Avinash Chander said the missile would become "fully operational" after two to three more launches to be carried out in the next three years.

DRDO has drawn up a busy schedule of tests for its diverse range of indigenous missiles, with the second test of its missile defence system set for August or October. The organisation is also planning user trials for its surface-to-air Akash missile and fourth generation anti-tank Nag missile.

Chander said Agni-I, with a range of 700 km, had already been inducted into the army while the country's first fully solid-state missile, the 2,000-km Agni-II, is currently being inducted.

Asked whether the proposed ICBM would be christened Surya, Natarajan said it be given a name derived from the Agni series.

For the first time, Chander said, DRDO had acted only as an integrating agency with the Agni-III, with most of the missile's components being made by private industry. A total of 258 private firms and 20 DRDO laboratories were involved in this venture.

"This is why there were no production delays and the next missile is being readied in parallel," he said.

"Agni-III is the first Indian missile to have crossed the equator," said Chander, adding that the detonation of the missile's warhead had been recorded and would be analysed.

Asked how much composite material had been used in the missile, he said: "Left to me, I would like to make it an all-composite missile as the use of more carbon-composites can make Agni-III lighter to increase its payload and range."

Sounding a word of caution, Natarajan said that there were "constraints" in manufacturing the Agni missiles in large numbers. The number to be made would be decided in consultation with the armed forces, he said.

The DRDO chief said his organisation had also faced a lot of constraints in rectifying faults that had led to the failure of the Agni-III's first test last year as the country lacked adequate ground test facilities for checking critical missile components.

Chander said some of the firsts established by yesrterday's launch included a "flex nozzle control" for the rocket motor, a specially developed composite propellant, a guidance and control system with "built-in fault tolerant avionics" and systems to withstand the "severe aero-thermal environment" experienced during re-entry.

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NEWS/newsrf.php?newsid=8532
 
.
I think Pakistan should PAY for this development. Another reason to achieve something to create a detterent threat against any nation in the world! :D
 
. . .
India, Pakistan should not destabilise the region: US
13 Apr, 2007

WASHINGTON: The Bush administration has cautioned Asian nations not to do anything that would "destabilise" the region after India successfully tested its nuclear-capable Agni III missile, while maintaining that New Delhi demonstrated "responsibility" with respect to prevention of weapons proliferation including nuclear technology.

US State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack, while admitting that he could not verify the characteristics of the latest Indian missile test, urged governments of the region to work within the parameters of agreements on prior notification regarding missile tests.

"The Indians do have an active missile programme. And typically what they do under their agreements with the Pakistani government is there's a prior notification.

"I can't verify for you at this point that that did take place in these circumstances. What we have - what we urge all the governments in the region to do, India, Pakistan included, is to work within the constraints of the agreements that they have regarding notification and also not take any actions that would be destabilising to the balance in the region," he said.

Asked if India'a latest missile test can be considered as an action that could destabilise the region, the spokesman replied: "I'd have to check to see if this is something that is technically different or goes beyond the previous technical, demonstrated capabilities of the Indian government, the Indian military, in launching the missile."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...abilise_the_region_US/articleshow/1904446.cms
 
.
What a full load of crap!

Arming India to counter China is already destabalising the region, what's a couple of ICBM's compared to all that's being offered to Delhi? :disagree:
 
.
What a full load of crap!

Arming India to counter China is already destabalising the region, what's a couple of ICBM's compared to all that's being offered to Delhi? :disagree:

Ofcourse that is not the actual reason ;)

Recent exercise of India with Russia-Us-Japan-China-Singapore shows we are still NAM onlee.

The actual reason is to pump more H1B's and put more CIA's inside! :P


Take my word for it, whats being offered has a difference with what we can afford and what we need for maintaining stability w.r.t "if", any invaders..

Meanshile Europe is leaving no stones unturned to arm China, though it is money onlee in that case (071 LPD etc).

Geopolitics is a critical game, its better Our establishment works solely for the developement of us and security of us. :)
 
.
European Amrs Embargo wont go that easily, French are still pissed of at that
 
.
Does it really matter that it wont go? , infact not going the embargo has a direct consequences with asking for more price.

Also NEO the article is taken from what a guy replied in a Radio in US.
 
. . .
Also NEO the article is taken from what a guy replied in a Radio in US.

Ah, thanks for clarifying I hadn't noticed. It was posted with a BR link, not a credible source anyway. :P :lol: ;)
 
.
Does it really matter that it wont go? , infact not going the embargo has a direct consequences with asking for more price.
Also NEO the article is taken from what a guy replied in a Radio in US.

Joey,

What do you mean by that , what are the consequences on price, and who will be asking for more price to whom
 
.
Ah, thanks for clarifying I hadn't noticed. It was posted with a BR link, not a credible source anyway. :P :lol: ;)

the IDR Premium article or Articles in the Hindu by Huma siddiqui or TS Subramanian are best!, TS subramanian has inside contacts, only he states the missile weight on accurate 43.7 tonnes and 2 m dia with 16.7m height as stated in BR.

US Department of State
Daily Press Briefing
Sean McCormack, Spokesman
Washington, DC
April 12, 2007

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2007/apr/82987.htm

QUESTION: Do you have anything -- any reaction to the missile that India test-fired this morning? Apparently, it could carry a nuclear warhead and is able to reach China.

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, the Indians do have an active missile program and typically what they do under their agreements with the Pakistani Government is there's a prior notification. I can't verify for you at this point that that did take place in these circumstances.

What we urge all the governments in the region to do -- India, Pakistan included -- is to work within the constraints of the agreements that they have regarding notification and also not take any actions that would be destabilizing to the balance in the region.

QUESTION: Do you consider this to be an action that's destabilizing to the region?

MR. MCCORMACK: Elise, I'd have to check to see if this is something that is technically different or goes beyond the previous technical demonstrated capabilities of the Indian Government, the Indian military, in launching the missile. I'm not aware that it does, but I'll be happy to check for you.

QUESTION: Just given everything you're trying to do kind of on the nuclear front with Iran and North Korea, getting them to kind of dismantle their nuclear programs, is this a time that India should be test-firing a missile that actually has a nuclear capability?

MR. MCCORMACK: Well, it's not the first time they've done this, to my knowledge -- test-fired missiles. As I said, I can't tell you what the technical capabilities of this missile are versus previous missile launches.

India is trying to enter into a different kind of relationship with the rest of the world vis-à-vis its nuclear program. We are in negotiations with the Indian Government about that, currently ongoing. They have in certain international fora demonstrated a certain level of responsibility with respect to preventing proliferation of weapons of mass destruction technology, including nuclear technology. So India certainly is trying to, I would say, enter into a different kind of relationship with the rest of the world than it has previously had on the nuclear issue.
..........
..........


Adux what i meant is the things that goes to China even after embargo look at Z9 helo, 071 LPD Radar on 051C, comes with a premium price for sure which if the embargo goes EU wont be able to charge the premium? I guess? My guess only :)
 
.
Neo,

BR has a bot that collects defence and strategic related news from all the newspapers. So if its a BR link, you open that, you will find that its a redirect from some newspaper. The link is on top of the page, click that. BR does not produce news.
So the question of credibility does not arise ;)
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom