What's new

IAI en route to extended range Barak-8ER

HariPrasad

BANNED
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
14,055
Reaction score
-22
Country
India
Location
India
IAI en route to extended range Barak-8ER
Published August 17, 2015 | By admin
SOURCE: Robin Hughes – IHS Jane’s Missiles & Rockets

1630913_-_main.jpg


Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) is expected to unveil the extended-range variant of its Barak-8 point and area defence system within the next 18 months.

Boaz Levy, Executive Vice President and General Manager, Systems Missiles and Space at IAI, told IHS Jane’s that the Barak-8ER (extended range variant) is currently under “internal development as a growth path of the Barak-8″. The Barak-8ER – which, Levy noted, “leverages the current Barak-8 building blocks” – will be offered for both naval and land-based applications.

The Barak-8ER interceptor configuration was first unveiled as a concept at the 2009 Paris Air Show and is effectively a base model of the highly agile Barak-8 missile, with the addition of a large diameter solid-propellant jettisonable booster to the existing dual-pulse rocket motor. The latter is understood to be equipped with a thrust vector control (TVC) system. The booster’s addition to the ER variant effectively doubles the down-range capability of the Barak-8 interceptor to 150km, said Levy.

IAI is flagging Barak-8ER as a completely IAI-developed system, including the interceptor. The current Barak-8 interceptor is supplied by Rafael Advanced Defence Systems, although IAI says that the Barak-8ER interceptor “might include some Rafael components, but essentially it is a completely new interceptor”.

Levy said that for both naval and land applications the Barak-8ER system will be supplied with a modified six-cell variant of the eight-cell Barak-8 launcher, and that the Barak-8ER interceptor can also be adapted to other launcher configurations, including the US Navy’s eight-cell MK 41 vertical launch system (VLS).

However, he noted that the system engineering solution for the Barak-8ER allows it to leverage the existing Barak-8 architecture: the same IAI Elta ELM-2248 S-band digital active phased array Multi-Function Surveillance, Track, & Guidance Radar (MF-STAR) 360º radar (the Barak-8ER land variant uses the rotating Land-Based MF-STAR system), the same BMC4I system, (produced by IAI’s Defense Systems Division), and the same naval or land-based launcher – with some minor modification – used with the Barak-8. “This allows us to offer an expanded engagement envelope to the current system, with minimal hardware changes,” Levy said.

Designed to engage multiple beyond visual range threats, the low launch signature Barak-8ER is understood to retain the same autopilot/inertial navigation system and active radar seeker guidance as the Barak-8, although some modifications to the software and to the missile control surfaces are likely. The booster increases the length of the missile at launch from its current 4.5 m to nearly 6 m, although the length in flight after the booster has been jettisoned may be slightly less than the base Barak-8 missile, if a TVC is not present. The missile diameter and fin spans are thought to be the same as the base Barak-8. The booster weight is currently unknown, although the missile’s weight after the booster has been jettisoned is the same as that for the current Barak-8 configuration.

Levy said that initial operational capability (IOC) for Barak-8ER will first be declared for the naval variant, followed by IOC for the land variant. He declined to comment on a launch customer for Barak-8ER, but noted “existing Barak-8 customers will be interested in this configuration because it offers additional capability to their current system”. Levy would not speculate on Barak-8ER as a future option for the Israel Navy’s Sa’ar class corvettes, or the Indian Navy’s Project 15E Kolkata-class destroyers, which are set to be equipped with the Barak-8 system.
 
.
Does it has any advantage over S 300 except for range,I know it's light and more maneuverable.
 
.
Does it has any advantage over S 300 except for range,I know it's light and more maneuverable.

S 300 is mainly targatted at planes while this one is an omnipotent missile very good against lanes and cruise missiles as well. It is said to have intercepted even brahmos which no other missile can do.
 
. . .
Nice addition to IAI arsenal of weapons, was removed from Janes for some reason, maybe some things best kept classified
 
. . . .
Will the ABISR weight less and need less powerful radar than likes of MF STAR ?
Sure u dont need very powerful radar for 35 km range missile. It can be used as prime weapon of some missile boat and as secondary weapon of large ship.

A question- what's the operational range of current iron dome , arrow 2 and arrow 3?
Iron Dome was developed from Derby missile, so its range should be 16-20 km.

Arrow 2/3 - two batteries are enough to cover entire Israel (probably except Eilat). So its range over 100 km. For anti ballistic missiles altitude is more important. Arrow 2 altitude is up to 50 km and Arrow 3 - over 100 km
 
.
Sure u dont need very powerful radar for 35 km range missile. It can be used as prime weapon of some missile boat and as secondary weapon of large ship.


Iron Dome was developed from Derby missile, so its range should be 16-20 km.

Arrow 2/3 - two batteries are enough to cover entire Israel (probably except Eilat). So its range over 100 km. For anti ballistic missiles altitude is more important. Arrow 2 altitude is up to 50 km and Arrow 3 - over 100 km
http://www.rafael.co.il/Marketing/186-1530-en/Marketing.aspx
According to this it has a range of 70 km and beyond , and I remember reading from IAF Web that they doubled the range
 
.
Arrow 2/3 - two batteries are enough to cover entire Israel (probably except Eilat). So its range over 100 km. For anti ballistic missiles altitude is more important. Arrow 2 altitude is up to 50 km and Arrow 3 - over 100 km

Wanted to ask this.

What's the difference between the roles and capability of David's Sling and Arrow 3?
 
. .
So David's Sling is more like S400+better capability against cruise missiles in its role , and Arrow 3 a dedicated ABM system ?

Has Arrow 3 capability upto against IRBM/MRBMs with >90% kill capability when facing multiple salvos of such ballistic missiles ?


Also , against Tactical Ballistic Missile like Nasr of Pakistan , or say Guided Smerch rocket , which would be better , David's Sling or Iron Dome?
 
.
So David's Sling is more like S400+better capability against cruise missiles in its role , and Arrow 3 a dedicated ABM system ?

Has Arrow 3 capability upto against IRBM/MRBMs with >90% kill capability when facing multiple salvos of such ballistic missiles ?



Also , against Tactical Ballistic Missile like Nasr of Pakistan , or say Guided Smerch rocket , which would be better , David's Sling or Iron Dome?
S400 is a multilayer system which can be compared to a combination of david sling of iron dome.
David sling is better against tactical ballistic missiles and cruise missiles.
Arrow and thaad are driven from similar concept but also differs in some aspects . Basically arrow 3 is ATBM
 
.
Back
Top Bottom