Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apologies to my poor knowledge. I had a understanding that palestinians have a small land and its naval front also taken by isreals and isreal is big country.
Am I wrong? In my view palestinians should relocate to safer place.
I dont have any knowledge or know the sentiments of ppl....
I understand Israelis,I just want to solve problem softly.
OK,let's Try Another Perspective.
is it acceptable for Israel expand their territory by buying land from East Africa without lose Jerusalem?of course,with agreement of local government and people's consent.don't leave any issue unsolved.
When they get new land,are they going to build their new land?wouldn't more and more Israelis move to new land automatically?just like US people move to west hundred years ago.
and then,if there are war in Jerusalem again,Israelis people can move to their Enklave for safe,leaving army fight in Jerusalem.if they win the war,they can go back to Jerusalem,if they lose the war,they won't lose all their territory,neither way,they lose less blood.
I think as the only Muslim country with nuclear weapons, it is Pakistan's duty to free Palestine. And it will never be the right time. We have to act now, every pakistani will fight no matter how much the sacrifice
I think even palestinians all relocate to other place,the war will not be over.if only one or several Muslim nation become powerful.they will try another war to Isreal.maybe Iran,maybe Syria,maybe both and more muslim nations.
What you have written is about an Jewish expansion rather than "moving" the nation as the title of your thread suggests.
If we are talking about "moving" the whole nation from A to B then that is impossible as mentioned before that the Promised Land is their land and they will not move no matter what.
If we are talking expansion as in purchasing faraway lands then that is a different matter completely. If that happens then you are promoting a Jewish expansion.
it may be same result according to different way.you get A and B both,and then lose A,the result is you get B only.but much confortable than you lose A first and make a hard way to get B.
There are many scenarios and possibilities. Perhaps getting B in the first place would be very difficult as anti-Israeli nations would condemn such an idea or pressuring the target nation selling land to the Israelis.
The bottom line for the Israeli's is that they will not leave their promised land unless done by force or self willing. At this moment, I don't see any nation who has the capability to move them by force.
Also, as they are being looked after by the Great S@tan, the chances are even slimmer.
if US is to create peace, wishes peace in the region, just why don't they declare middle east region nuke free zone, and disarm israel, and let both nations live in peace!!, its a very silly excuse the "promised land", jews killed jesus, didn't they???
Do you think the US want peace in the ME?. There are many reasons that the US would not want peace in the region. There are many strategic reasons and it is not in the US interest for a peaceful ME.
About the nuclear free zone, that is not possible. First, you must understand the relationship between the US and Israel. They are like a mother/child relationship. Do you think the mother would take away the dominant toy off her child?...I don't think so.
To add to the confusion, the Israeli nuclear program is ambiguous. Although we know they have it, but their stance is vague.
its too late for isreal to move
the only thing that could be done now is to destroy it
but that wont happen anytime soon because of the arab nations disunity
so,the ture reason why ME has no peace is that US don't want peace in ME. I don't think relationship between the US and Israel is a mother/child relationship. the relationship is body bomb and his commander.