Daniel808
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2013
- Messages
- 4,960
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Low population density doesn't mean you don't need to upgrade your Dying old Infrastructure, in this case High Speed Rail (HST).
China maybe have Total population almost 1.4 Billion Manpower, but you need to remember.
Western area of Heihe-Tengchong Line, only have 6% of population. That's mean only 85 million people.
But that doesn't mean China don't need to Upgrade their Infrastructure in Western Area, in this case High Speed Rail.
For example, Lanzhou - Urumqi High Speed Rail Network
Lanzhou - Urumqi High Speed Rail Network
Low population density is not a reason to keep your dying old infrastructure keep alive, and don't upgrade it
That's only a Ridiculous excuses for low IQ people.
But Chinese have higher IQ, so you cannot fool Chinese members
It's the same reason like Indian horde in here always say, It doesn't matter how poor their life, how dirty their living environment, how unhygienic their food as long as they have Supa powa Democrazy, India is much much better than other country
@TaiShang @GS Zhou @Cybernetics @LKJ86 and many others
85m people is still the size of Germany, and the lines are funded by the central government.
You talk population density before, then you need to bring 2 aspect there.
Population and size area.
85 million yes it's the same size of Germany population, but since when the Western Area of Heihe-Tengchong Line in China is the as large as Germany???
you mean, Nazi germany in their peak?
China's Western Area of Development is much much bigger than Germany, and for sure this area population density is much lower.
But Low population density doesn't prevent China to upgrade their infrastructure, in this case building a massive High Speed Railway Network int that area (Western China Area)
Again, I think you needed your eyes and head check.
WHERE EXACTLY DID I SAY UNITED STATES DID NOT MAINTAIN THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE DUE TO LOW POPULATION DENSITY?
I said low density is the reason American do not need High Speed Rail, High Speed Rail is not the same as old infrastructure, which include subway, highway, A-Road, B-Road, port and etc, which is a consensus here in this topic agreed by multiple member across different nations. I also said both Air and Ground infrastructure needed upgrade, and I also discuss why US did not upgrade their infrastructure except for a few with my exchange with @Oscar above.
Why you so emotional with that Big Red typing?
I don't bring Super South Vietnam here, so please calm down.
My friend have a research about Emotional instability with IQ level, but that's another disscussion for another time. Not relevan to bring it here.
Okay back to topic
In this case (this thread) what I mean about not upgrading your infrastructure is not building High Speed Railway Network (HST)
And since when, because you have low population density that's mean you don't need High Speed Railway Network?
Western China have Low population density, but that doesn't mean they don't upgrade their infrastructure there, in this case building a High Speed Rail Network.
For example, Lanzhou-Xinjiang High Speed Railway Network.
That's in the Western China, who have Low Population Density.
Like I said before,
Low population density is not a reason to not have High Speed Railway Network. That's only a ridiculous excuse.
It's like Indian members in here say, they don't need any good living condition, healthy and hygienic food, good Infrastructure, Clean government, as long as they have Democrazy everything is Fine and good.
a Ridiculous excuses for ridiculous people.
Look at this drama, again
@AndrewJin @GS Zhou @Cybernetics @Han Patriot