What's new

"I killed French soliders because of marines' urinating video" Afg soldier!

for starters... taliban do have a right to defend.. i agree.. i never said they didnt... secondly, if the usa didnt support the taliban, russia would control afghanistan still today... and yes a terrorist is someone who deliberately kills innocent people.. something the taliban do quite often.. even blow up their own people to fight america.. how is that not backwards?? lol

i think america been in too many wars, but that because no one else will stand up and do it otherwise.. if the usa didnt involve itself.. the world would be a much more dangerous place

and no one has taken over the whole world...

henry the 8th was a crazed madman, much like your leaders of today.. its not good i agree.. im glad u see sense

LMAO!!,
You are a crazy guy. You have no idea how dangerous it is inside the U.S. Almost every person owns a gun. Check figures and see who gets killed by guns the most each year. For your information, it is ranked as #1, the figure is somewhere around 10,000 + deaths each year.
While racism in the U.K ended in the 1880s, racism in America is still there. Watch documentaries by Micheal Moore. He is a white American and he will tell you how his country is like....
I see that you're an Aussie. Just go there and see how they treat you. Nobody there like anybody there, unless a person is facially white American.
Look at how much smuggling there is in the country... especially drugs....
While you look at big cities such as New York, Chicago, Los Angleles, etc, try going to 90% part of the country. You will be tortured like an a bird in a cage...

How in the world do you expect America to save the world, when its own people are messing around?

You are a funny guy. So Alexander the Great, the Roman Empire, the British empire, and American bases all over the world was not all about taking over the whole world?
 
.
These are the same sort of terrorist scum who butchered those captured Pakistani militia in cold blood. And people are concerned because they were urinated upon?

Let me get this straight... you can blow them up, stab them, shoot them, that's OK. But once they are dead, better be polite to them. Is that it?

I don't agree with the urination thing. I think it was juvenile. But is this an appropriate response?

Chogy - although i personally felt angered at the behavior of the American troops - i dont accept the actions of this soldier. Its wrong and we all know it. When stories of any deaths like this any sane person should put their rage to one side and think rationally. Its not easy when you read stories like the one below :

US marine in Haditha case 'should serve no time'

A US marine who admitted charges linked to the killing of 24 unarmed Iraqi civilians in 2005 should face no time in detention, a judge has recommended.
The decision by the judge at Camp Pendleton, California, must be approved by the commander of the Marine Corps Forces Central Command.
Sgt Frank Wuterich faced a maximum of three months after admitting dereliction of duty in a plea deal.

He was one of eight marines charged over the killings at Haditha.

The charges against six were dropped or dismissed, and one was acquitted.

Military judge Lt Col David Jones said his hands had been tied by the terms of the plea agreement. However, he said he would recommend that Wuterich's rank be reduced to private.

The judge said he had decided not to dock the marine's pay because Wuterich is divorced with sole custody of his three young children.
Prosecutors had asked that Wuterich receive the maximum sentence of three months confinement, reduction in rank and forfeiture of two-thirds of his pay.
Wuterich's guilty plea ended the trial at Camp Pendleton nearly seven years after the killings.

Prosecutors had argued that on the day of the killings Wuterich lost control after seeing a friend blown apart by a bomb, before leading the soldiers under his command on a rampage.

They said his decision to send his squad to attack nearby homes went against his training.

"That is a horrific result from that derelict order of shooting first, ask questions later," Lt Col Sean Sullivan told the court.

Among the dead were women, children and elderly people, including a man in a wheelchair.
His former squad members testified during the hearings that they were not fired upon nor did they find any weapons at the scene of the killings.


Wuterich told the court that he ordered his men to "shoot first, ask questions later" so they would not hesitate in attacking the enemy, but he never intended to harm any civilians.

In his statement he addressed relatives of the Iraqi victims, saying there were no words to ease their pain.

"I wish to assure you that on that day, it was never my intention to harm you or your families. I know that you are the real victims of November 19, 2005," he said.

In Iraq, the plea deal that stopped Wuterich's trial on several charges of manslaughter sparked outrage.

Survivor Awis Fahmi Hussein, who had been shot in the back, said: "I was expecting that the American judiciary would sentence this person to life in prison and that he would appear and confess in front of the whole world that he committed this crime, so that America could show itself as democratic and fair."


BBC News - US marine in Haditha case 'should serve no time'

Now Chogy i condemn this attack on the Nato soldiers - can i ask you can you please understand the animosity and anger that exists when you hear how America hands out punishment to people that murder people in wheelchairs?
 
.
These are the same sort of terrorist scum who butchered those captured Pakistani militia in cold blood. And people are concerned because they were urinated upon?

Let me get this straight... you can blow them up, stab them, shoot them, that's OK. But once they are dead, better be polite to them. Is that it?

I don't agree with the urination thing. I think it was juvenile. But is this an appropriate response?

You should understand the society you're operating in. Your soldiers accidentally performed the Pashtun custom of urinating on your slain enemy's corpse - a sign that you have completed your domination and his humiliation. It also means other things, such as now you're immune to being caught or killed by his tribesmen.

Think like a Pashtun and you'll have your answers. That Afghan soldier was his Afghan tribesman, and the war goes on.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom