What's new

Hyderabad Deccan's Nizam's contribution to Pakistan

53fd

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The Nizam of Hyderabad remained a staunch supporter of Pakistan. Upon the creation of Pakistan on August 14, 1947, the Nizam was isolated since the State of Hyderabad was surrounded by the newly independent Republic of India. Under these conditions, the Nizam could not declare accession to Pakistan out of fear that India would invade the State of Hyderabad which it did a year later.

During this period, the new state of Pakistan had tremendous financial problems as India had not released Pakistan's share to it in hopes that Pakistan would collapse economically.

Recalling the incidents of that period, Mr. Farooq Ahmed Khan, Retired Deputy Inspector General of Police recalls some of the most important incidents of this episode stating:

"Not many people know that at the time when Pakistan came into existence in 1947; and before the fall of Hyderabad, due to unprovoked Indian military aggression in 1948. The Government of Pakistan had to start a new country from scratch. And India had purposely not given the share, which Pakistan was supposed to get under the “Partition Agreement”; because in the beginning Pakistan did not even have the money to pay the salaries of the Government officers and employees. Although the morale of the people was high, and the people were ready to make sacrifices for the new country, which they had aspired for, and had now finally become a reality. At that critical period, it was Hyderabad State, which came forward to help Pakistan, and rescue the country from bankruptcy or collapse.

"For this purpose, a novel scheme was implemented. An adventurous British commercial pilot was contacted and engaged in his private capacity to secretly fly loads of gold from Hyderabad to Pakistan, eluding the Indian planes, which could have stopped the flight or shut down the plane.

"This rescue project for Pakistan was the idea of Qasim Rizvi, the leader, who was then in power in Hyderabad. Nizam had also given his consent for this noble action, undertaken at great risk.

"Fortunately this scheme worked, which helped to keep going the newly formed Pakistan. Needless to say, that this invaluable and timely help from Hyderabad to Pakistan, at such a critical juncture, cannot be forgotten."[1]

The most famous case still pending in the UK in this regard relates to the 1,007,940 pounds sterling that the Nizam had transferred through the National Westminster Bank in 1948 favouring the Pakistan High Commissioner in London Mr. H.I. Rahimtoola. This money is now worth over 30 million pounds sterlin. The Govt of India laid claim to the money against the claim of the Govt of Pakistan. The case is still sub judice.
 
.
The Gold and wealth that the Nizam sent to Pakistan was not his in the first place.

It belonged to the people whom the rulers of such princely states as then Nizam of Hyderabad had looted for centuries.

It is equivalent to a thief gifting his booty to others as part of his will.
 
. . . .
What the article essentially states is that the state of Pakistan has its foundations into wealth looted by a thief.

When the water itself is poisoned, you can very well imagine how the fruits of the tree are going to be.
 
.
What the article essentially states is that the state of Pakistan has its foundations into wealth looted by a thief.

When the water itself is poisoned, you can very well imagine how the fruits of the tree are going to be.

It's funny considering calling someone a thief when what India did to Kashmir, Hyderabad, Sikkim, Junagarh constitutes it as one.
 
.
It's funny considering calling someone a thief when what India did to Kashmir, Hyderabad, Sikkim, Junagarh constitutes it as one.

Sikkim itself voluntarily succeeded to india. as far as other three are concerned then the truth is at that time it was all abt power game. pakistan tried to take kashmir & india tried for hydrabad & junagarh. india was successive while pakistan failed. this is the story
 
.
Sikkim itself voluntarily succeeded to india. as far as other three are concerned then the truth is at that time it was all abt power game. pakistan tried to take kashmir & india tried for hydrabad & junagarh. india was successive while pakistan failed. this is the story

Pakistan even tried to claim ownership over Lakshadweep Islands :lol:

Sardar Patel is the man behind the integration of Lakshadweep Islands with the Republic of India. The inhabitants of these islands were cut off from the mainstream of the country and learnt about Indian Independence days after 15 August 1947. It was Patel who realised that Pakistan could lay claim to these islands on the grounds of Muslim majority, though the islands were nowhere near the new state of Pakistan. An Indian Navy ship was sent to Lakshadweep to hoist the national flag by Patel to thwart any attempt by Pakistan to grab the islands. Just a couple of hours thereafter, vessels belonging to the Pakistan Navy were spotted near the islands.These vessels however retreated to Karachi after seeing the Indian flag flying over the Lakshadweep.[87]
Political integration of India - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

:lol:
 
.
Dont forget this though:

August 18, The Nawab of Mohammad Mahabat Khanji III, ruler of the Princely state of Junagadh, a former British Protectorate since 1807 and the other small states of Bantva, Manavadar and Sardargadh, were also former British Protectorates since 1818 of the Kathiawar Peninsula despite an overall Hindu majority of the population all acceded to the Dominion of Pakistan, this was influenced by Shah Nawaz Bhutto the Dewan of the state. In response the Dominion of India claimed that the accession was invalid, since the states were surrounded by India and demanded a Plebiscite on the future of Junagadh and Manavadar (princely state). Pakistan agreed, on condition that votes also be held in Hyderabad State and Kashmir and Jammu; India rejected this proposal and also refused to allow the Government of Pakistan any role in administering a plebiscite. The dispute was the first serious crisis in Indo-Pakistani relations.
 
. . . . . .
Back
Top Bottom