What's new

Human Right abuses continue in Tibet

if all religious zealots would set themself on fire, the world would be a much better place.
 
The right to set oneself on fire, the right to cause disturbance in the community, the right to disregard laws, and the right to attract attention with dangerous acts are not the so-called basic human rights.

Here's the fishy thing:

Every single time law is excessively used in China, it hits the front pages. However, when other countries do the same (trust me, they do it as frequently as China does), it does not get reported. You can get a sense of this by typing "cop beats up..." on YouTube and clicking search or by simply talking to their prisoners. Every time human rights improve in China, it's barely mentioned, but every time there's a short fallback, everybody is screaming how China's human rights record is getting worse.

Did the world condemn the US when they imprisoned Cuban civilians who were helping the FBI catch fugitives? Did the world condemn the CIA when plans of their false-flag attack on US airlines were released? How about the fact that the US imprisons more people than any other country in the world?

How many people in the world know that China, at its current stage, is the most democratic and free period in its 5000 year history? How many people still call China a dictatorship even when China changes its leaders every 9 years?

A biased press is not a free press, so it's funny how people are still complaining about China's lack of so-called freedom of speech.
 
Back
Top Bottom